WHAT we do: plug straight into the definition — no nozzle geometry needed, just three measured numbers.
WHY:CF is defined as thrust divided by the "reference force" PcA∗. This is the fastest way to grade a real test firing.
PcA∗=5×106×0.008=4.0×104N=40000NCF=4000090000=2.25
A high value — this nozzle is doing a lot of amplifying.
Recall Solution 1.2
False.CF=PcA∗F=(Pa)(m2)N=(N/m2)(m2)N=NN — force over force, so it is dimensionless. It is a pure amplification factor.
WHAT we do: break the square root into a constant K times a bracket, then multiply.
WHY split it: the constant K depends only on γ and is reused across many problems; the bracket carries the expansion.
Constant:
γ−12γ2=0.22(1.44)=14.4,(2.22)0.22.2=(0.9091)11=0.3505K=14.4×0.3505=5.048
Bracket (exponent γγ−1=1.20.2=0.1667):
1−(0.02)0.1667=1−0.5214=0.4786CF,mom=5.048×0.4786=2.416=1.554
Recall Solution 2.2
WHAT we do: add the pressure term to the momentum term.
WHY: exit pressure Pe differs from ambient Pa, so the unbalanced pressure over the exit area contributes.
PcPe−PaA∗Ae=70.14−0.10×25=70.04×25=+0.1429
The term is positive here because Pe>Pa (slightly under-expanded — see Over- and Under-Expanded Nozzles).
CF=1.554+0.143=1.697
WHAT we do: only the pressure term changes with altitude; CF,mom is fixed by geometry.
(a) Sea level:
60.05−0.10×30=6−0.05×30=−0.25⇒CF=1.60−0.25=1.35
(b) Vacuum:
60.05−0×30=60.05×30=+0.25⇒CF=1.60+0.25=1.85WHY the flip: at sea level the outside air (0.1 MPa) is stronger than the exhaust exit (0.05 MPa), so ambient pressure pushes back on the exit — a penalty. In vacuum there is nothing pushing back, so the same exit pressure becomes a bonus. Same nozzle gains ΔCF=0.50 just by climbing to space.
What the figure shows: the curve below plots CF against ambient pressure Pa for this fixed nozzle. The cyan line slopes downward as Pa rises (more outside push-back). The dashed white line marks the constant momentum coefficient 1.60; where the cyan line crosses it (dotted vertical, at Pa=Pe=0.05 MPa) the pressure term is exactly zero. The two amber dots mark our answers: the vacuum bonus (upper-left, CF=1.85) and the sea-level penalty (lower-right, CF=1.35).
Recall Solution 3.2
WHAT we do: divide the pressure term by the total CF.
WHY: this ratio tells us how much of the nozzle's grade is bought by the pressure bonus versus raw momentum — it justifies (or not) the extra weight of a big bell.
CFpressure term=1.850.25=0.135=13.5%
Momentum thrust dominates (86.5%), but the pressure bonus is why space engines carry giant bells: adding area Ae/A∗ in vacuum only ever helps.
(a) Momentum term.K=5.048 (from 2.1, same γ). Exponent 0.1667; Pe/Pc=0.1/7=0.01429.
WHY the bracket: it measures how much of the gas's energy the expansion has converted to speed — a smaller Pe/Pc means a fuller expansion and a bracket closer to 1.
1−(0.01429)0.1667=1−0.4926=0.5074,CF,mom=5.048×0.5074=2.561=1.600(b) Pressure term (vacuum, Pa=0).WHY Pa=0: in vacuum nothing pushes back on the exit, so the entire exit pressure Pe becomes a thrust bonus.
PcPe−0A∗Ae=70.1×25=0.3571(c) Add the two contributions — the definition of the full coefficient is momentum term plus pressure term:
CF=1.600+0.357=1.957(d)F=CFPcA∗=1.957×(7×106)×0.01=1.370×105N≈137kN.
WHY (d) works:CF is by construction the multiplier on the reference force PcA∗. Multiply and you recover thrust — no need to know Tc, R, or m˙. That independence from Tc is the whole reason CF exists (see Characteristic Velocity c-star for the part that does carry Tc).
Recall Solution 4.2
WHAT we do: eliminate m˙ between the two relations.
Isp=m˙g0F=m˙g0CFc∗m˙=g0CFc∗Isp=9.811.85×1700=9.813145=320.6sWHY it factors so cleanly: exhaust speed =CFc∗; dividing by g0 converts it to seconds. This shows the clean split — nozzle score CF times combustion score c∗ gives performance Isp. See Specific Impulse Isp.
WHAT we do: set the bracket [1−(Pe/Pc)(γ−1)/γ]→1 (since Pe→0), leaving only K.
CF,max=K=5.048=2.247WHY this is a ceiling: even an infinitely long nozzle can only extract the gas's full available energy once. What remains is set purely by γ — the gas's own thermodynamic springiness. No geometry beats K; a softer gas (lower γ) has a higher ceiling because more of its energy is convertible to directed motion.
Recall Solution 5.2
The argument. Making the nozzle longer (bigger Ae/A∗) lowers Pe. This raises the momentum term (bigger bracket) but the pressure term PcPe−PaA∗Ae turns negative once Pe<Pa. The two effects trade off, and calculus shows the total CF peaks exactly when Pe=Pa — the pressure term crosses zero there. Physically: any exit pressure mismatch wastes energy (either un-expanded pressure left over, or over-expansion pushing sideways).
Numeric confirmation for 3.1's engine at sea level (Pa=0.1 MPa). If we could re-tune the nozzle so Pe=Pa=0.1 MPa, the pressure term vanishes and CF=CF,mom at that new (larger) matched expansion. With the given fixed geometry Pe=0.05<Pa, the engine is over-expanded and loses 0.25 (from 3.1a), confirming the un-matched case sits below the matched optimum:
CF,sea, actual=1.35<CF,mom, matched=1.60.
Recall Solution 5.3
Bracket at Pe/Pc=0.10: 1−(0.10)0.1667=1−0.6813=0.3187, so CF,mom=5.048×0.3187=1.609=1.269.
Bracket at Pe/Pc=0.01: 1−(0.01)0.1667=1−0.4642=0.5358, so CF,mom=5.048×0.5358=2.705=1.645.
Factor: 1.645/1.269=1.296 — about a 30% gain in momentum coefficient for a tenfold drop in exit pressure. Diminishing but real; this is why vacuum bells grow so large.
Recall One-line self-test
Why is CF independent of chamber temperature Tc? ::: Because the RTc from mass flow cancels the RTc from exit velocity when you divide by PcA∗ — CF sees only ratios (Pe/Pc, Pa/Pc) and geometry (Ae/A∗), never absolute temperature.