Exercises — Pauli exclusion principle
Level 1 — Recognition
(You should be able to state the rule and read off quantum numbers.)
L1.1
State the Pauli exclusion principle in one sentence, then say which of these particles obey it: electron, photon, proton, neutron, -particle.
Recall Solution
Statement: No two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state — i.e. they cannot have all four quantum numbers identical. Obey it (fermions, half-integer spin): electron, proton, neutron. Do NOT obey it (bosons, integer spin): photon (spin 1), -particle (spin 0). Why: the principle is a fermion-only consequence of an antisymmetric wavefunction (). Bosons have symmetric wavefunctions and can pile up.
L1.2
For the quantum number , list all allowed values of , and state how many electrons this subshell can hold.
Recall Solution
runs from to in integer steps: Each orbital holds 2 electrons (spin up + spin down): (This is the -subshell.)
Level 2 — Application
(Plug the rule into counting problems.)
L2.1
How many electrons can shell hold? Derive it by enumerating subshells — do not just quote .
Recall Solution
For , .
- : orbital e⁻ ().
- : orbitals e⁻ ().
- : orbitals e⁻ ().
Total . Check against formula: . ✓
L2.2
Write the ground-state electron configuration of Fluorine () and identify which subshell is not yet full.
Recall Solution
Fill lowest energy first (Aufbau order ): Count: . ✓ The subshell holds up to 6 but has only 5 — it is one electron short of full. That single vacancy is why fluorine is so reactive.
L2.3
A hypothetical universe gives electrons three spin states () instead of two. How many electrons would shell hold?
Recall Solution
Number of orbitals for is unchanged: gives 1, gives 3, total orbitals. Now each orbital holds 3 electrons (three spins): (Normally it would be .)
Level 3 — Analysis
(Explain why, using antisymmetry and enumeration.)
L3.1
Starting from the antisymmetric two-fermion state show explicitly that putting both fermions in the same state () gives , and explain in words what "" physically means.
Recall Solution
Set everywhere: Physical meaning: the probability of finding the system in any configuration is . A state with zero probability everywhere does not exist. So two fermions simply cannot both sit in state — that is the Pauli exclusion principle, dropping out of the minus sign, not added by hand. See the picture below.
L3.2
Prove that the number of electrons in shell is , using the identity that the sum of the first odd numbers is .
Recall Solution
Total capacity: The factor 2 out front is the spin doubling Pauli allows. The terms for are exactly — the first odd numbers. Their sum is . Hence The staircase picture below shows why consecutive odd numbers build a perfect square.
L3.3
Helium's two electrons both live in the orbital (). Show this does not violate Pauli, then explain why Lithium's third electron cannot join them.
Recall Solution
Helium: the two electrons have quantum sets They agree on but differ in — so the full four-number sets are not identical. Pauli is satisfied. Lithium (): a third electron in would need with — but both of those addresses are already taken. Any choice repeats an existing full set → forbidden. So the third electron must start the next shell, (the ). This is exactly how shell structure — and the whole periodic table — is born.
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Combine Pauli with Hund's rule, spin-statistics, and other topics.)
L4.1
Carbon is . The two electrons could in principle (a) share one orbital with opposite spins, or (b) occupy two different orbitals with parallel spins. Which does nature choose, and what two rules decide it?
Recall Solution
Nature chooses (b): two different orbitals, parallel spins.
- Pauli permits both (a) and (b) — neither repeats a full quantum-number set.
- Hund's rule breaks the tie: electrons maximize total spin by singly occupying separate orbitals with parallel spins before pairing up, because parallel spins keep electrons spatially apart and lower the repulsion energy.
So the actual configuration is with both spins up, e.g. quantum sets and — different , same . Legal by Pauli, favoured by Hund.
L4.2
A white dwarf is held up not by heat but by electron degeneracy pressure. Explain, using Pauli, why compressing the star costs energy even at (nearly) zero temperature.
Recall Solution
Squeeze the star smaller each electron is confined to a smaller region. By quantum confinement, a smaller box has higher allowed momentum/energy levels. Pauli forbids electrons from all sitting in the lowest level — every added electron must occupy the next-higher unoccupied state. So there is a huge "stack" of filled high-momentum states even at . Compressing further raises every occupied level, which costs energy. Resisting that compression is felt as an outward degeneracy pressure. Key nuance: this is not an electromagnetic repulsion; it is the energy price of Pauli forcing fermions up the energy ladder. (For a BEC, bosons all crash into the lowest level — no such pressure exists.)
L4.3
Why is it precisely half-integer spin that produces the antisymmetric () wavefunction, and what theorem guarantees this link?
Recall Solution
The connection is the content of the Spin-statistics theorem: in relativistic quantum field theory, particles with half-integer spin () must have antisymmetric multiparticle wavefunctions (fermions), while integer spin () must be symmetric (bosons). The minus sign is not a choice — it is forced by requiring a consistent, causal relativistic theory. Antisymmetry Pauli, so half-integer spin Pauli.
Level 5 — Mastery
(Multi-step problems mixing counting, antisymmetry, and edge cases.)
L5.1
Element with (iron). Write its ground-state configuration and count how many unpaired electrons it has. (Recall fills before .)
Recall Solution
Aufbau order: Count: . ✓ Unpaired electrons — the subshell. The has 5 orbitals. By Hund's rule, fill each singly first (5 electrons, all parallel), then the 6th must pair up in one orbital: That leaves orbitals still holding a single (unpaired) electron. Unpaired electrons . (This is why iron is strongly magnetic.)
L5.2
Neon is — a closed shell ( and both full). Compute the total spin summed over all 10 electrons, and use Pauli to explain why the answer must come out this way.
Recall Solution
Every orbital of a filled subshell contains exactly one and one electron (Pauli forces the two occupants of each orbital to have opposite spin). So they cancel in pairs: With 5 orbitals () all doubly filled, . Why forced: a full subshell has no room for an unpaired spin — every slot uses both spins. Hence closed-shell atoms (noble gases) have zero net spin, are non-magnetic, and are chemically inert.
L5.3 (degenerate / edge case)
What is the maximum number of electrons with the specific quantum numbers ? Then: how many electrons in all of have (any )?
Recall Solution
Part 1 — one fully specified orbital. Fixing leaves only free. Pauli allows exactly 2 electrons here. Part 2 — all within . For to be allowed we need . In , can be . Of these, all include ( does not, since can only be ). That's 3 qualifying orbitals, each holding 2 electrons: Edge-case lesson: is impossible for — always check that before counting.
Connections
- Quantum numbers — the four-number address every problem here manipulates.
- Spin and intrinsic angular momentum — the doubling behind .
- Aufbau principle and electron configuration — filling order used in L2.2, L5.1.
- Hund's rule — decides the parallel-spin arrangements in L4.1 and L5.1.
- Spin-statistics theorem — the why behind antisymmetry (L4.3).
- White dwarf and neutron star — degeneracy pressure (L4.2).
- Bose-Einstein condensate — the boson mirror-world contrast.
- Periodic table structure — the grand pattern all this counting produces.