This page is the drill ground for the parent topic . The parent gave us one master formula. Here we throw every kind of input at it — steep angles, flat angles, weird shapes, sliding blocks, energy, time, friction — and solve each one from the ground up.
Before any symbol appears, here is the one tool we reuse everywhere. It was earned in the parent note; we restate it in full plain words so nothing is assumed.
Keep the shape table pinned in your mind:
Object
β
one-word memory
Solid sphere
2/5 = 0.40
marble
Solid cylinder / disc
1/2 = 0.50
coin
Hollow sphere (shell)
2/3 ≈ 0.67
tennis ball
Ring / hoop / pipe
1
bangle
Sliding block (no rolling)
0
ice cube
Every question this topic can ask lives in one of these cells. The worked examples below each carry a tag like (Cell A2) so you can see the coverage is complete.
#
Cell class
What makes it special
Covered by
A1
Standard angle (0 < θ < 90° )
plain plug-in
Ex 1
A2
Compare two shapes
ranking / who wins
Ex 2
B1
θ → 0 (flat) degenerate
sin θ → 0 , a → 0
Ex 3
B2
θ → 90° (vertical) limit
sin θ → 1 , max a
Ex 3
C1
β = 0 (sliding block) degenerate
rolling term vanishes
Ex 4
C2
β → ∞ (mass far out) limit
a → 0
Ex 4
D1
Energy / final speed
uses v = 2 g h / ( 1 + β )
Ex 5
D2
Time to descend
uses t = 2 L / a
Ex 6
E1
Friction required (find f )
is the slope rough enough?
Ex 7
E2
Slip threshold (exam twist)
when rolling breaks
Ex 8
F1
Real-world word problem
translate words → symbols
Ex 9
F2
Unknown shape (back-solve β )
measure a , find shape
Ex 10
Worked example Solid cylinder on a 20° slope
A solid cylinder is released from rest on a θ = 20° incline. Find its acceleration. Use g = 9.8 .
Forecast: guess — will a be more or less than g sin 20° ≈ 3.35 ? (A rolling body is always slower than a sliding one, so expect less .)
Identify β . Solid cylinder ⇒ β = 2 1 .
Why this step? β is the only shape-dependent input; get it first.
Write the formula. a = 1 + β g sin θ = 1 + 2 1 g sin 20° = 1.5 g sin 20° .
Why this step? Direct substitution — nothing else varies.
Compute sin 20° = 0.342 . So g sin 20° = 9.8 × 0.342 = 3.352 .
Why this step? sin θ is the fraction of gravity along the slope; we need its number before dividing.
Divide. a = 3.352/1.5 = 2.23 m/s 2 .
Why this step? Dividing by 1 + β applies the "spin tax" that slows the body.
Verify: 2.23 < 3.35 ✔ (rolling is slower than pure sliding, as forecast). Units: pure number m/s 2 = m/s 2 ✔.
Worked example Marble vs bangle on the same 30° slope
A solid sphere and a ring start together from the top of a 30° incline. By what factor is the sphere's acceleration larger?
Forecast: the ring hides its mass at radius R , so it should be markedly slower — guess a ratio around 1.3 –1.5 .
Sphere: β = 5 2 , so a sph = 1 + 2/5 g sin 30° = 7/5 g sin 30° = 7 5 g sin 30° .
Why this step? Plug the sphere's shape factor.
Ring: β = 1 , so a ring = 2 g sin 30° = 2 1 g sin 30° .
Why this step? Same slope, different β — the only change.
Ratio. a ring a sph = 1/2 5/7 = 7 10 = 1.4286 .
Why this step? g sin 30° cancels — the race depends only on β , so the answer is slope-independent.
Verify: 10/7 ≈ 1.43 , inside the forecast window ✔. The sphere accelerates 43% faster ⇒ wins the race, matching the parent's ranking.
Here we stress-test θ itself. The figure below is the geometric heart of this example: it draws four slopes of increasing tilt and shows, at each, the full weight (plum, always straight down) and its along-slope component g sin θ (orange). Watch the orange arrow grow from a stub at 10° to nearly the full weight at 85° — that growing arrow is the driving push in our formula. Steps 1 and 2 below simply read off the two endpoints of that growth.
Figure: the along-slope drive g sin θ (orange) grows from 0 at flat ground to the full weight at vertical, while the total weight (plum) never changes.
Worked example Flat slope and near-vertical slope (solid sphere)
For a solid sphere (β = 2/5 ), what is a when (a) θ = 0° and (b) θ = 90° ? Use g = 9.8 .
Forecast: flat ground = nothing rolls, so a = 0 . Straight down = the sphere is basically in free-fall but slowed by spin — expect a = 7 5 g ≈ 7 .
Case θ = 0° (Cell B1). sin 0° = 0 , so a = 7/5 g ⋅ 0 = 0 m/s 2 .
Why this step? On flat ground the orange arrow in the figure shrinks to zero length — gravity has no component along the surface, so nothing pushes it forward.
Case θ = 90° (Cell B2). sin 90° = 1 , so a = 7/5 g = 7 5 g = 7 5 ( 9.8 ) = 7.0 m/s 2 .
Why this step? At vertical the orange arrow reaches the full weight (its longest in the figure); sin θ maxes out at 1. This is idealised — a truly vertical surface can't press back to give friction, so rolling would actually break here (that's Cell E2's job). We take it as the mathematical limit .
Verify: a ( 0° ) = 0 ✔ (sensible — flat ground). a ( 90° ) = 7.0 < 9.8 = g ✔ (still slower than pure free-fall because energy goes into spin). Both extremes bracket every real answer 0 ≤ a ≤ 7.0 for a solid sphere.
Worked example The frictionless block and the mass-flung-out wheel
On a 45° slope: (a) a frictionless sliding block (β = 0 ); (b) a hypothetical wheel whose entire mass sits on the rim at ever-larger radius, driving β → ∞ . Compare accelerations. Use g = 9.8 , sin 45° = 0.707 .
Forecast: the block has no spinning to feed, so it should hit the theoretical maximum g sin θ . The β → ∞ wheel wastes everything on spin — guess a → 0 .
Block, β = 0 (Cell C1). a = 1 + 0 g sin 45° = g sin 45° = 9.8 × 0.707 = 6.93 m/s 2 .
Why this step? With no rotational inertia the master formula collapses to plain Newton on an incline — this is the sliding-block limit. It is the fastest anything can go on this slope.
β → ∞ (Cell C2). a = 1 + β g sin 45° → ∞ 6.93 = 0 .
Why this step? As mass moves infinitely far from the axis, it becomes infinitely hard to spin; gravity spends all its budget on rotation, leaving nothing for forward motion.
Verify: Every real rolling object (0 < β ≤ 1 ) must satisfy 0 < a < 6.93 on this slope. Check ring: a = 6.93/2 = 3.46 ✔ — comfortably between the two extremes. The whole ranking is boxed in by these two cells.
Worked example Hollow sphere down a 1.2 m drop
A hollow sphere (β = 2/3 ) rolls from rest down an incline, dropping a vertical height h = 1.2 m . Find its speed at the bottom. Use g = 9.8 .
Forecast: a sliding block would reach 2 g h = 2 ( 9.8 ) ( 1.2 ) ≈ 4.85 . Rolling steals some for spin, so expect less — guess ~3.8 .
Energy balance. All the lost height-energy becomes motion: m g h = 2 1 m v 2 + 2 1 I ω 2 .
Why this step? Static friction does no work in rolling (Friction in Rolling ), so energy is conserved — see Energy Conservation in Rolling .
Fold spin into the shape factor. Using I = β m R 2 and ω = v / R , the whole right side becomes 2 1 m v 2 ( 1 + β ) . Cancel m : g h = 2 1 v 2 ( 1 + β ) .
Why this step? Same ( 1 + β ) "spin tax" that appears in the acceleration formula; folding it in leaves a single unknown v .
Solve for v . Multiply both sides by 2/ ( 1 + β ) then take the square root: v = 1 + β 2 g h = 1 + 2/3 2 ( 9.8 ) ( 1.2 ) = 1.667 23.52 = 14.11 = 3.76 m/s .
Why this step? We want v alone, so we undo the 2 1 ( 1 + β ) multiplying v 2 , then undo the square by rooting.
Verify: 3.76 < 4.85 ✔ (slower than a sliding block, as forecast). Units: m/s 2 ⋅ m = m 2 / s 2 = m/s ✔.
Worked example How long to roll 3 m?
A solid sphere (β = 2/5 ) rolls from rest down L = 3 m of slope at θ = 25° . How many seconds to reach the bottom? Use g = 9.8 , sin 25° = 0.4226 .
Forecast: it accelerates a few m/s², over 3 m — guess about 1–1.5 seconds.
Acceleration first. a = 1 + 2/5 g sin 25° = 7/5 9.8 ( 0.4226 ) = 1.4 4.141 = 2.958 m/s 2 .
Why this step? Time depends on how fast it speeds up, so we need a from the master formula before anything else.
Kinematics from rest. L = 2 1 a t 2 ⇒ t = a 2 L .
Why this step? Constant acceleration with zero start speed gives the standard "distance = ½at²"; we invert it to get t .
Plug in. t = 2.958 2 ( 3 ) = 2.029 = 1.424 s .
Why this step? Substitute the known L and computed a to get the number.
Verify: inside the forecast ✔. Sanity: final speed v = a t = 2.958 × 1.424 = 4.21 m/s ; also v = 2 a L = 2 ( 2.958 ) ( 3 ) = 17.75 = 4.21 ✔ — the two routes agree. Units: m / ( m/s 2 ) = s 2 = s ✔.
Worked example Friction force on a rolling disc
A solid cylinder of mass m = 2 kg rolls without slipping down a 30° slope. Find the friction force f that makes this happen. Use g = 9.8 .
Forecast: friction here isn't wasting energy — it's the torque supplier . It should be a modest fraction of the weight component.
Acceleration. β = 2 1 , so a = 1.5 g sin 30° = 1.5 9.8 ( 0.5 ) = 3.267 m/s 2 .
Why this step? We need a to find how much force was "used up" by rotation.
Friction from the rotation equation. In the parent derivation f = β ma .
Why this step? Rearranging torque f R = I α with α = a / R gives exactly the force that spins the body (Torque and Angular Acceleration ).
Plug in. f = 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 3.267 ) = 3.267 N .
Why this step? Substitute β , m , and the computed a into f = β ma to get the number.
Verify: cross-check with translation law m g sin θ − f = ma : 2 ( 9.8 ) ( 0.5 ) − 3.267 = 9.8 − 3.267 = 6.533 , and ma = 2 ( 3.267 ) = 6.533 ✔. Units: kg ⋅ m/s 2 = N ✔.
Worked example Minimum coefficient of friction to keep a hoop rolling
A ring/hoop (β = 1 ) rolls without slipping down a slope of angle θ . The available static friction is f m a x = μ m g cos θ . Find the smallest μ that prevents slipping, for θ = 40° .
Forecast: steeper slopes demand more friction; a hoop needs a lot of torque, so expect μ of a few tenths.
Required friction. f req = β ma with a = 1 + β g sin θ , so f req = 1 + β β m g sin θ .
Why this step? This is the friction the rolling motion demands (from Ex 7's logic).
Set demand ≤ supply. Rolling holds when f req ≤ μ m g cos θ . The threshold is equality:
μ m i n = 1 + β β t a n θ .
Why this step? Divide both sides by m g cos θ ; the m g cancels and sin / cos = tan . We use tan because it is exactly the ratio "pull-along ÷ press-into-slope", i.e. how hard gravity tries to make it skid versus how hard it's pinned down.
Plug in β = 1 , θ = 40° , tan 40° = 0.8391 : μ m i n = 2 1 ⋅ 0.8391 = 0.4196 .
Why this step? Substitute the hoop's β and the angle to get the numeric threshold.
Verify: dimensionless (a coefficient) ✔. Sanity on shape: a solid sphere (β = 2/5 ) needs only μ m i n = 7/5 ( 2/5 ) ( 0.8391 ) = 0.2397 — less than the hoop ✔, because it needs less spin-torque. Below these μ values the object would slip , and the whole a = g sin θ / ( 1 + β ) analysis stops being valid.
Worked example A can of soup on a ramp
"A sealed can of soup (treat as a solid cylinder, β = 1/2 ) is rolled from rest down a 15° loading ramp that is 2.5 m long. How fast is it going when it reaches the floor, and how long did it take?" Use g = 9.8 , sin 15° = 0.2588 .
Forecast: gentle slope, short ramp — slow-ish, maybe 2 m/s and a couple of seconds.
Translate words to symbols. "solid cylinder" ⇒ β = 2 1 ; "from rest" ⇒ v 0 = 0 ; "2.5 m long" ⇒ L = 2.5 (distance along the slope).
Why this step? Word problems are 90% translation — pin every phrase to a symbol.
Acceleration. a = 1.5 g sin 15° = 1.5 9.8 ( 0.2588 ) = 1.691 m/s 2 .
Why this step? Both the speed and the time need a , so compute it first from the master formula.
Final speed. v = 2 a L = 2 ( 1.691 ) ( 2.5 ) = 8.454 = 2.907 m/s .
Why this step? Starting from rest, v 2 = 2 a L links speed directly to distance without needing time; L is along the ramp so it pairs with a .
Time. t = a v = 1.691 2.907 = 1.719 s .
Why this step? From v = a t (started at rest), invert to get t from the just-found v .
Verify: forecast matched (≈2.9 m/s, ≈1.7 s) ✔. Cross-check L = 2 1 a t 2 = 2 1 ( 1.691 ) ( 1.71 9 2 ) = 2 1 ( 1.691 ) ( 2.955 ) = 2.50 ✔.
Worked example Identify an unknown object from its acceleration
An unknown uniform round object rolls from rest down a 30° incline and is measured to accelerate at a = 3.5 m/s 2 . What is its β , and which standard shape is it? Use g = 9.8 .
Forecast: g sin 30° = 4.9 , and a = 3.5 is fairly close to it → small β → probably a solid sphere.
Invert the master formula. From a = 1 + β g sin θ , multiply both sides by ( 1 + β ) and divide by a : 1 + β = a g sin θ , so β = a g sin θ − 1 .
Why this step? We're given a and want β , so we algebraically isolate β instead of plugging into the usual direction.
Plug in. g sin 30° = 9.8 ( 0.5 ) = 4.9 . β = 3.5 4.9 − 1 = 1.4 − 1 = 0.4 .
Why this step? Substitute the known angle and measured a to get the numeric shape factor.
Match the table. β = 0.4 = 2/5 → solid sphere .
Why this step? Compare the computed β against the pinned shape table to name the object.
Verify: forward-check — solid sphere gives a = 1.4 4.9 = 3.5 m/s 2 ✔, exactly the measured value. Forecast confirmed.
Every cell of the scenario matrix now has a worked home:
Ex 9 word and Ex 10 shape
Recall Which formula for which question?
Find a ::: a = 1 + β g sin θ
Find final speed ::: v = 2 g h / ( 1 + β ) or v = 2 a L
Find time from rest ::: t = 2 L / a
Find friction needed ::: f = β ma
Find slip threshold ::: μ m i n = 1 + β β tan θ
Back-solve the shape ::: β = a g sin θ − 1