Worked examples — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law
Before anything, let me re-earn three words so nobody is lost:
The scenario matrix
Two arrows can meet in a surprisingly small number of genuinely different ways. Here is every cell we must hit, and which worked example covers it.
| # | Case class | What is special about it | Covered by |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Acute angle () | cross term is positive | Ex 2 |
| C2 | Right angle () | cross term is zero → pure Pythagoras | Ex 1 |
| C3 | Obtuse angle () | cross term is negative → resultant shrinks | Ex 3 |
| C4 | Degenerate: same direction () | arrows collinear, resultant is maximum | Ex 4 |
| C5 | Degenerate: opposite () | arrows anti-parallel, resultant is minimum | Ex 4 |
| C6 | Zero input (one arrow has length ) | adding "nothing" — identity check | Ex 4 |
| C7 | Inverse problem (given , find ) | solve the formula backwards | Ex 5 |
| C8 | Direction lands in a tricky quadrant | , so naive misleads | Ex 6 |
| C9 | Real-world word problem | boat crossing a river (velocity + velocity) | Ex 7 |
| C10 | Exam twist | "resultant is perpendicular to " condition | Ex 8 |
We now hit every cell.
Example 1 — Right angle (cell C2)
Forecast: guess the resultant before reading on. Is it bigger or smaller than ? (It must be smaller — they don't fully help each other.)
- Kill the cross term. Why this step? At , , so . The formula collapses to — plain Pythagoras, because the two arrows form a right angle exactly like the two short sides of a right triangle.
- Direction. Why this step? ; with , this is .

Verify: lies inside the allowed band . ✔ Units: N + N → N. ✔ And tilts toward north — sensible, because the northward pull () is the stronger of the two.
Example 2 — Acute angle (cell C1)
Forecast: the arrows are equal and lean toward each other. Where should the answer point? (Right down the middle — symmetry demands it.)
- Magnitude. Why this step? , so the cross term is positive and adds length.
- Direction. Why this step? Same formula; .
Verify: is exactly half of — the resultant bisects the angle, which is what equal vectors must do. ✔ sits inside . ✔
Example 3 — Obtuse angle (cell C3)
Forecast: same magnitudes as Example 2 but wider apart. Bigger or smaller resultant? (Smaller — they now fight each other more.)
- Magnitude. Why this step? , so the cross term is now negative: . This is the whole point of obtuse angles — the arrows partly cancel.
- Direction. , :

Verify: Compare with Ex 2: same lengths, wider angle → smaller resultant (). ✔ The bisector logic still holds: . ✔
Example 4 — The degenerate trio (cells C4, C5, C6)
Forecast: collinear arrows behave like ordinary numbers. Predict all three before the algebra.
- (a) Same direction, (C4). Why? , so . This is the maximum any resultant can reach.
- (b) Opposite, (C5). Why? , so . This is the minimum. (We write so the length stays positive even if .)
- (c) Adding zero, (C6). Why? An arrow of length is "stay put". The formula gives , and . The zero vector is the identity: .

Verify: every resultant of these two arrows must live in . Cases (a) and (b) are the two ends of that band, and (c) gives . ✔
Example 5 — Inverse problem: given the resultant, find the angle (cell C7)
Forecast: , , ... does that trio ring a Pythagorean bell? If so, what angle does Pythagoras demand?
- Write the formula, treat as the unknown. Why this step? We know and both magnitudes; only is missing, so isolate it.
- Substitute.
- Solve. Why this step? Subtract from both sides:
Verify: Plug back: . ✔ It matches the given resultant, and is the classic right triangle — consistent with . ✔
Example 6 — Direction in a tricky quadrant (cell C8)
Forecast: is much longer and points mostly backwards (up and to the left). So the resultant should point into the upper-left — past . Watch how the naive arctan tries to hide this.
- Break into components. Why this step? Because the resultant clearly won't sit near ; going through lets us read the quadrant honestly. With , :
- Magnitude. Why this step? Pythagoras on those components. (Cross-check with the direct formula: ✔.)
- The direction trap. Why this step? . A calculator's returns — which would point down-and-right, the wrong quadrant! Because and , the arrow is really in the second quadrant (up-left). The fix: add .

Verify: is past , matching our forecast of "upper-left". And sits inside . ✔ The lesson: whenever , the resultant leans backward and you must add to the bare arctangent.
Example 7 — Real-world word problem (cell C9)
Forecast: the boat aims straight across but the water carries it sideways. It cannot go faster than . Guess where the true speed lands.
- Identify the two vectors. Why this step? Velocities add exactly like displacements (they are "like quantities"). Here (across) and (downstream), meeting at .
- Magnitude. Why this step? Right angle → Pythagoras.
- Direction. Why this step? Angle away from the "straight across" () vector:
Verify: is between and . ✔ Units: m/s throughout. ✔ This is the same -- geometry as Example 1 — a reassuring echo (see Relative velocity for the full boat-and-river treatment).
Example 8 — Exam twist: resultant perpendicular to (cell C10)
Forecast: "" is a disguised equation. What must the horizontal part of be if points straight up from ? (It must vanish.)
- Translate the geometry into algebra. Why this step? If is perpendicular to (our x-axis), then has no x-component: .
- Solve for . Why this step? One equation, one unknown.
- Find from the y-component. Why this step? Since , the whole resultant is its y-component.
Verify: Check with the full magnitude formula: . ✔ And → undefined → , confirming . ✔
Recall Quick self-test across the whole matrix
Right-angle resultant of and ::: , at Equal vectors () at : magnitude and direction ::: , bisecting at Equal vectors () at : magnitude ::: Maximum and minimum resultant of and ::: (at ) and (at ) and giving resultant : what is ? ::: (since ) When must you add to the arctan direction? ::: When "Resultant perpendicular to " as an equation :::
Connections
- Vectors — components and unit vectors — Examples 6 and 8 lean entirely on the component picture.
- Resolution of a vector into components — the split used throughout.
- Subtraction of vectors and the difference vector — Example 4(b) () is the seed of subtraction.
- Relative velocity — Example 7 is a first taste; the river problem lives here in full.
- Law of cosines — the magnitude formula is this rule in disguise; the inverse problem (Ex 5) is "solve the cosine rule for the angle".
- Scalar (dot) product — supplies the hiding in the cross term.
- Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law — the parent note these examples serve.