1.1.8 · D3Measurement, Vectors & Kinematics

Worked examples — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law

1,963 words9 min readBack to topic

Before anything, let me re-earn three words so nobody is lost:


The scenario matrix

Two arrows can meet in a surprisingly small number of genuinely different ways. Here is every cell we must hit, and which worked example covers it.

# Case class What is special about it Covered by
C1 Acute angle () cross term is positive Ex 2
C2 Right angle () cross term is zero → pure Pythagoras Ex 1
C3 Obtuse angle () cross term is negative → resultant shrinks Ex 3
C4 Degenerate: same direction () arrows collinear, resultant is maximum Ex 4
C5 Degenerate: opposite () arrows anti-parallel, resultant is minimum Ex 4
C6 Zero input (one arrow has length ) adding "nothing" — identity check Ex 4
C7 Inverse problem (given , find ) solve the formula backwards Ex 5
C8 Direction lands in a tricky quadrant , so naive misleads Ex 6
C9 Real-world word problem boat crossing a river (velocity + velocity) Ex 7
C10 Exam twist "resultant is perpendicular to " condition Ex 8

We now hit every cell.


Example 1 — Right angle (cell C2)

Forecast: guess the resultant before reading on. Is it bigger or smaller than ? (It must be smaller — they don't fully help each other.)

  1. Kill the cross term. Why this step? At , , so . The formula collapses to — plain Pythagoras, because the two arrows form a right angle exactly like the two short sides of a right triangle.
  2. Direction. Why this step? ; with , this is .
Figure — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law

Verify: lies inside the allowed band . ✔ Units: N + N → N. ✔ And tilts toward north — sensible, because the northward pull () is the stronger of the two.


Example 2 — Acute angle (cell C1)

Forecast: the arrows are equal and lean toward each other. Where should the answer point? (Right down the middle — symmetry demands it.)

  1. Magnitude. Why this step? , so the cross term is positive and adds length.
  2. Direction. Why this step? Same formula; .

Verify: is exactly half of — the resultant bisects the angle, which is what equal vectors must do. ✔ sits inside . ✔


Example 3 — Obtuse angle (cell C3)

Forecast: same magnitudes as Example 2 but wider apart. Bigger or smaller resultant? (Smaller — they now fight each other more.)

  1. Magnitude. Why this step? , so the cross term is now negative: . This is the whole point of obtuse angles — the arrows partly cancel.
  2. Direction. , :
Figure — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law

Verify: Compare with Ex 2: same lengths, wider angle → smaller resultant (). ✔ The bisector logic still holds: . ✔


Example 4 — The degenerate trio (cells C4, C5, C6)

Forecast: collinear arrows behave like ordinary numbers. Predict all three before the algebra.

  1. (a) Same direction, (C4). Why? , so . This is the maximum any resultant can reach.
  2. (b) Opposite, (C5). Why? , so . This is the minimum. (We write so the length stays positive even if .)
  3. (c) Adding zero, (C6). Why? An arrow of length is "stay put". The formula gives , and . The zero vector is the identity: .
Figure — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law

Verify: every resultant of these two arrows must live in . Cases (a) and (b) are the two ends of that band, and (c) gives . ✔


Example 5 — Inverse problem: given the resultant, find the angle (cell C7)

Forecast: , , ... does that trio ring a Pythagorean bell? If so, what angle does Pythagoras demand?

  1. Write the formula, treat as the unknown. Why this step? We know and both magnitudes; only is missing, so isolate it.
  2. Substitute.
  3. Solve. Why this step? Subtract from both sides:

Verify: Plug back: . ✔ It matches the given resultant, and is the classic right triangle — consistent with . ✔


Example 6 — Direction in a tricky quadrant (cell C8)

Forecast: is much longer and points mostly backwards (up and to the left). So the resultant should point into the upper-left — past . Watch how the naive arctan tries to hide this.

  1. Break into components. Why this step? Because the resultant clearly won't sit near ; going through lets us read the quadrant honestly. With , :
  2. Magnitude. Why this step? Pythagoras on those components. (Cross-check with the direct formula: ✔.)
  3. The direction trap. Why this step? . A calculator's returns — which would point down-and-right, the wrong quadrant! Because and , the arrow is really in the second quadrant (up-left). The fix: add .
Figure — Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law

Verify: is past , matching our forecast of "upper-left". And sits inside . ✔ The lesson: whenever , the resultant leans backward and you must add to the bare arctangent.


Example 7 — Real-world word problem (cell C9)

Forecast: the boat aims straight across but the water carries it sideways. It cannot go faster than . Guess where the true speed lands.

  1. Identify the two vectors. Why this step? Velocities add exactly like displacements (they are "like quantities"). Here (across) and (downstream), meeting at .
  2. Magnitude. Why this step? Right angle → Pythagoras.
  3. Direction. Why this step? Angle away from the "straight across" () vector:

Verify: is between and . ✔ Units: m/s throughout. ✔ This is the same -- geometry as Example 1 — a reassuring echo (see Relative velocity for the full boat-and-river treatment).


Example 8 — Exam twist: resultant perpendicular to (cell C10)

Forecast: "" is a disguised equation. What must the horizontal part of be if points straight up from ? (It must vanish.)

  1. Translate the geometry into algebra. Why this step? If is perpendicular to (our x-axis), then has no x-component: .
  2. Solve for . Why this step? One equation, one unknown.
  3. Find from the y-component. Why this step? Since , the whole resultant is its y-component.

Verify: Check with the full magnitude formula: . ✔ And → undefined → , confirming . ✔


Recall Quick self-test across the whole matrix

Right-angle resultant of and ::: , at Equal vectors () at : magnitude and direction ::: , bisecting at Equal vectors () at : magnitude ::: Maximum and minimum resultant of and ::: (at ) and (at ) and giving resultant : what is ? ::: (since ) When must you add to the arctan direction? ::: When "Resultant perpendicular to " as an equation :::


Connections

  • Vectors — components and unit vectors — Examples 6 and 8 lean entirely on the component picture.
  • Resolution of a vector into components — the split used throughout.
  • Subtraction of vectors and the difference vector — Example 4(b) () is the seed of subtraction.
  • Relative velocity — Example 7 is a first taste; the river problem lives here in full.
  • Law of cosines — the magnitude formula is this rule in disguise; the inverse problem (Ex 5) is "solve the cosine rule for the angle".
  • Scalar (dot) product — supplies the hiding in the cross term.
  • Vector addition — triangle law, parallelogram law — the parent note these examples serve.