3.6.9 · D43D Geometry

Exercises — Angle between two planes

2,797 words13 min readBack to topic

The one formula we lean on the whole way (built from the Scalar (dot) product):

Remember what each piece means: the top counts how much the two arrows agree in direction; the bottom scales that agreement by the arrows' lengths so only their tilt matters, not how long we happened to draw them.

The picture below is the whole page in one image: two flat sheets (lavender and mint) hinged along a line, each with its normal arrow (coral , violet ) sticking straight out. The angle between those two arrows is the angle of the wedge — that is exactly what the formula above computes. Keep this figure in mind for every problem: we never measure the sheets, only their arrows.

Figure — Angle between two planes

Figure 1 — Two planes meet in a wedge along their hinge line; the angle between the outward normals equals the angle between the planes.


Level 1 — Recognition

Here you only need to read off the normal and plug in. No traps in the algebra yet.

Recall Solution L1.1

The normal is just the list of coefficients of (see Equation of a plane).

  • First plane: .
  • Second plane: . The constant on the right (, or the ) plays no role in orientation — it only slides the sheet, it does not tilt it.
Recall Solution L1.2

Rewrite as and , so , .

  • Dot: .
  • A zero dot product means the arrows are perpendicular, so and . What it looks like: two walls of a room meeting along the -axis in a clean right angle.
Recall Solution L1.3
  • , .
  • Dot: .
  • Zero again . These planes are perpendicular even though neither is an axis plane.

Level 2 — Application

Now you run the full formula, including magnitudes and the modulus.

Recall Solution L2.1
  • , .
  • Dot (WHAT: measure directional agreement): .
  • Magnitudes (WHY: normalise out arrow length): , .
Recall Solution L2.2
  • , .
  • Dot: . Negative!
  • .
  • The modulus rescues us: What it looks like (see Figure 2 below): the coral arrow and the lavender arrow separate by the small green arc; if we forgot the bars and flipped to (the dotted grey arrow — same plane!), we'd read off the large yellow arc instead. The modulus always keeps the small one.
Figure — Angle between two planes

Figure 2 — Why the modulus matters: flipping a normal () does not change the plane but swaps the acute answer for the obtuse one. The bars keep the acute wedge.

Recall Solution L2.3

First, what is ? It is the position vector — the arrow from the origin to a general point on the plane. So the statement literally says "for every point on the plane, its position dotted with the fixed vector gives the same number ." That fixed is precisely the normal (see Normal vector and dot product), so in this form the normal is read off directly.

  • , .
  • Dot: .
  • , .

Level 3 — Analysis

Now you must choose what to do — solve for an unknown, or diagnose a relationship.

Recall Solution L3.1

WHY a zero dot product means perpendicular. The Scalar (dot) product obeys , where is the angle between the two arrows. The lengths are never zero for real normals, so the whole product is zero exactly when , i.e. : the normal arrows are at right angles. And two planes are perpendicular precisely when their normals are perpendicular (tilt the sheets to a right angle and the arrows sticking out of them turn to a right angle too). So: Now apply it:

  • , .
  • Dot: .
  • Set to zero:
Recall Solution L3.2

WHY scalar-multiple normals mean parallel planes. Recall the normal points straight out of its sheet, so the normal's direction fixes the sheet's tilt completely (its length is irrelevant — a longer arrow in the same direction sticks out of the same-tilted sheet). If for some number , the two arrows point along the same line, hence the two sheets have the same tilt — they are parallel (or the very same plane). And parallel arrows meet at , so the angle between the planes is . Now check:

  • , .
  • Check ratios: . All equal, so : parallel.
  • Angle between parallel planes is (they never open into a wedge). Sanity via formula:
Recall Solution L3.3
  • Dot: .
  • , , product .
  • Geometry: both normals have length and share only the -component. The overlap () is exactly half of , and "half" is the signature cosine of .

Level 4 — Synthesis

Here you assemble the plane or the answer from partial data.

Recall Solution L4.1

The point is a decoy for the angle question — angle needs only the normals.

  • , .
  • Dot: .
  • , .
  • (The point would only matter if we were asked for the plane's equation or a distance.)
Recall Solution L4.2

The plane has normal . We want , so .

  • Our normal , , .
  • Dot: .
  • Equation: .
  • WHY we may square both sides (WHAT/WHY): WHAT — we square to clear the square root and the modulus. WHY it is safe — both sides are non-negative here ( and ), and squaring is a reversible step whenever both sides are (it creates no false solutions and loses none). Squaring also replaces by , erasing the modulus cleanly:
  • Normal ; through origin gives .
Recall Solution L4.3
  • , .
  • Dot: ; .
  • Line of intersection: solve and ; let , so . It runs along through the origin.

Level 5 — Mastery

Full multi-step reasoning, degenerate checks, and cross-topic links.

Recall Solution L5.1

We are given directions inside the plane, not the normal. WHY the cross product? For the angle formula we must feed in the plane's normal, and the cross product is by construction perpendicular to both and — so it is perpendicular to the whole plane they span, i.e. it is a normal. That is exactly the direction we lack, so the cross product is the right tool (no other combination of is guaranteed perpendicular to both). How to compute it — the determinant formula:

  • So .
  • for .
  • Dot: ; , .
Recall Solution L5.2
  • , .
  • Dot: .
  • , .
  • Set .
  • WHY we may square both sides: both sides here are non-negative — the left side is a modulus over positive square roots (), the right side is . When both sides of an equation are , squaring is a reversible step (it neither creates nor loses solutions), and it conveniently kills the since . Squaring:
  • Rearranging: . Since , every term is and the constant keeps the left side — so there is no real . (Because our squaring was reversible, this "no solution" is genuine, not an artefact.) Interpretation: these two normals can never be tilted only apart — a genuinely valuable "no solution" answer.
Recall Solution L5.3

Both have ; they are parallel (same tilt, different shift).

  • Dot: ; each, product .
  • Why: identical normals means identical tilt, so there is no wedge to open — the angle is genuinely , not "undefined". This is the limiting case that closes off the parallel scenario.
Recall Solution L5.4

For a line and a plane we use sine, because the line vs the normal is the complement (see Angle between a line and a plane): Step 1 — identify the vectors. The plane has normal ; the line's direction is . Step 2 — dot product (numerator). Step 3 — magnitudes (denominator). , , so the product is . Step 4 — assemble and invert. Contrast: for two planes we would have used the same fraction with cosine, giving . Note : the line–plane angle and the "normal-to-normal" angle are complementary — that is the whole reason . "Cosine for planes, Sine for the line."


Recap ladder

Recall One-line summary of each level

L1 Recognition ::: read off ; ignore the constant . L2 Application ::: full formula with modulus and magnitudes. L3 Analysis ::: solve for unknowns; perpendicular ⇔ dot , parallel ⇔ ratios match. L4 Synthesis ::: build the plane/normal from partial data; ignore decoy points for angles. L5 Mastery ::: cross product for in-plane data, no-solution cases, degenerate , and vs .


Connections