1.1.7 · D5Electricity & Charge Basics

Question bank — Calculate electrical power (P = VI, P = I²R)

1,489 words7 min readBack to topic

Before you start, keep these three plain-word anchors in mind, because every trap plays with one of them:


True or false — justify

True or false: and are two different laws of nature.
False. Both come from after substituting Ohm's law ; they are one law rewritten to fit the quantities you happen to know.
True or false: doubling the current through a fixed resistor doubles the heat it dissipates.
False. With fixed, also doubles (Ohm), so quadruples — two things doubled means ×4 power.
True or false: for a fixed resistor, halving the voltage across it cuts the power to one quarter.
True. with fixed, so power scales with voltage squared; half the voltage gives the power.
True or false: if two devices draw the same current, the one at higher voltage delivers more power.
True. ; with equal, larger means more energy per coulomb, so more watts.
True or false: a resistor with a higher resistance always dissipates more power.
False. It depends on what's held constant. At fixed current rises with ; but at fixed voltage falls as rises. You must state what's fixed.
True or false: increasing increases power in every case.
False. Same trap as above from the other side — decreases with . The relationship flips depending on whether current or voltage is the fixed quantity.
True or false: the watt already contains "per second," so multiplying watts by seconds gives joules.
True. , so recovers joules (see Energy and the Joule) — but only if is in seconds.
True or false: a 100 W bulb and a 100 W heater deliver the same rate of energy.
True. A watt is a watt regardless of the device — both convert 100 joules of electrical energy every second, though into different useful outputs.

Spot the error

"Find the heat in a resistor carrying : since , and the supply is , ."
The error is using the supply voltage instead of the voltage across that resistor. With only and known, use .
"A device runs for 2 hours at 60 W, so energy ."
Time must be in seconds for joules. ; the "2" was hours, not seconds.
"To reduce heat loss in a long cable, use a thinner wire so less current fits through."
Backwards. Thinner wire means higher resistance, and heat rises with for the same current. You want thick, low- wire (see Heat Dissipation and Cooling).
"Since is linear in , tripling the current triples the resistor's heat."
In a fixed resistor, is not independent — it rises with . Use : tripling current gives the power, not 3×.
"A 0.25 W resistor is safe as long as the voltage across it never exceeds 0.25 V."
Rating is about power, not voltage. Safety depends on or ; a small voltage across a small resistance can still exceed 0.25 W.
"Two resistors in series share the supply voltage, so I can put the full supply voltage into for each one."
In series the voltage divides across the resistors, so each sees only its own share. Using the full supply voltage overstates each resistor's power.
" and must give different answers because one has a square and one doesn't."
They give the same answer for the same situation; is just after substituting . If they disagree, a wrong value was plugged in.

Why questions

Why does the (time) vanish when we derive from ?
Because , so and the cancels — energy-per-second collapses cleanly into voltage times current.
Why does have a square on the current but does not?
In the resistor is fixed, so raising current also raises the voltage drop (). Both factors of grow with , giving .
Why do power companies transmit electricity at very high voltage?
For a given amount of delivered power, high voltage means low current, and heat loss in the lines is — cutting current dramatically cuts wasted heat.
Why does a resistor's power rating matter more than just its resistance value?
The rating tells you how much heat it can shed before failing; exceed the (or ) it can dissipate and it overheats and burns (see Resistors and Power Ratings).
Why can we say all three formulas are "the same law"?
Each is with one variable swapped using Ohm's law . They describe identical physics; only which two quantities you know changes which costume is convenient.
Why does choosing the right formula depend on what you already know rather than what's "correct"?
All three are correct, but each avoids extra work: with use ; with use ; with use — so you never have to compute a missing quantity first.

Edge cases

What is the power when the current is exactly zero (an open circuit)?
Zero watts. ; no charge flows, so no energy is delivered no matter how high the voltage.
What is the power dissipated when the voltage across a resistor is exactly zero (both ends at the same potential)?
Zero watts. ; with no potential difference there's no push, so no charge does work and no heat appears.
What does predict as shrinks toward zero (a short circuit), and is it physical?
It predicts . In reality tiny stray resistances and the source's own limits cap it, but the formula correctly warns that a short releases enormous power — hence sparks and blown fuses.
What does predict as for a fixed current?
. A perfect conductor carrying current dissipates no heat, which is why superconducting or very-thick paths are prized for reducing losses.
If a device is rated exactly at its limit — say a 0.25 W resistor dissipating exactly 0.25 W — what's the risk?
It runs at the very edge with no thermal margin; small rises in current, voltage, or ambient temperature push it over, so good design leaves headroom.
Can power be delivered with a huge voltage but almost no current, or vice versa?
Yes — only cares about the product. High-/low- (transmission lines) and low-/high- (a starter motor) can give the same wattage.

Connections