2.1.8 · D4Quantum Atomic Structure

Exercises — Pauli exclusion principle

2,498 words11 min readBack to topic

Quick reminder of the four labels — from Quantum numbers:


Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1

Which of these four-number sets is forbidden for a single electron (i.e. is not even a legal quantum-number set)? (a) (b) (c) (d)

Recall Solution

The rule for legality: must satisfy , and must satisfy .

  • (a) can be or ; ✓, and is in ✓. Legal.
  • (b) can be . Here too big. Forbidden.
  • (c) only; ✓. Legal.
  • (d) ✓. Legal.

Answer: (b). This is not a Pauli violation — it is an illegal address to begin with.

L1.2

An orbital is a fixed triple . How many electrons can occupy one orbital, and what forces that limit?

Recall Solution

With fixed, the only freedom left is , which has exactly 2 values (). Pauli forbids identical quartets, so the two electrons must take the two different spins. Answer: 2 electrons, with opposite spins, forced by the two-valuedness of .


Level 2 — Application

L2.1

How many orbitals are in a subshell, and what is its maximum electron count?

Recall Solution

"" means . Number of orientations orbitals. Each orbital holds 2 electrons, so max . Answer: 7 orbitals, 14 electrons.

L2.2

Find the maximum number of electrons in the shell by building it up from scratch (do not just quote ), then read off the general rule.

Recall Solution

Let us derive the shell capacity rather than recall it, so we see why the answer comes out. Step 1 — list the subshells. A shell contains all from to . For : (that is ). Step 2 — orbitals in each. Each has orbitals: . Step 3 — electrons in each. Double each for the two spins: . Step 4 — add up. . Now the general rule. The orbital counts are the odd numbers, and the picture below shows the beautiful fact that the first odd numbers add to (they tile a perfect square). So: and doubling for spin gives For : ✓ — matching our brick-by-brick count. Answer: 32, and the formula is earned, not assumed.

Figure — Pauli exclusion principle

L2.3

List every legal quantum-number set for an electron in the subshell. How many are there?

Recall Solution

: . Then and . That is sets: . Answer: 6 distinct sets — exactly the capacity.


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1

A student writes the ground-state configuration of carbon (6 electrons) as and places both electrons in the same orbital with opposite spins. Is this Pauli-legal? Is it the actual ground state? Explain the difference.

Recall Solution

Pauli-legal? Yes. Two electrons in one orbital with opposite spins have sets and — they differ in , so Pauli is satisfied. Actual ground state? No. Hund's rule says electrons occupy separate degenerate orbitals with parallel spins first, to minimise electron–electron repulsion. So carbon's real ground state puts the two electrons in two different orbitals ( and , say) with the same spin. The difference: Pauli sets the ceiling (what is forbidden). Hund picks the arrangement among allowed options. The paired-in-one-orbital version is a legal excited state, not the ground state.

L3.2

Two electrons in a helium atom have sets and . What does the antisymmetric two-electron wavefunction evaluate to, and what does that mean physically?

Recall Solution

With identical states , the antisymmetric combination from the parent note is The two terms are identical and subtract to zero. Meaning: everywhere → zero probability → this configuration does not exist. That is why the two electrons of helium are forced to opposite spins: and .

The figure below makes this concrete. On the left (mint box) the two electrons carry opposite spins (one up-arrow in lavender, one down-arrow in coral): the fourth number differs, the quartets are distinct, and — an allowed atom. On the right (coral box) both electrons are drawn spin-up (two lavender arrows): all four numbers now match, the two terms of cancel exactly, and — the configuration is erased from existence. Read the two boxes as "allowed vs erased," and the arrows tell you which spins Pauli permits.

Figure — Pauli exclusion principle

L3.3

For the shell , count the number of electrons that have .

Recall Solution

Shell holds electrons total. Exactly half have each spin (every orbital's two electrons split into one and one ). . Answer: 9 electrons with . Cross-check by subshell: contributes 1, (3 orbitals) contributes 3, (5 orbitals) contributes 5 → ✓.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1

Explain, using Pauli plus , why the periods of the periodic table have lengths rather than following exactly ().

Recall Solution

Pauli fixes subshell capacities: . Period length equals the number of electrons added as you cross that row, and the order of filling is set by Aufbau principle (lowest energy first), not simply by .

  • Because energies overlap ( fills before , before , etc.), the block "lags" one shell and the block lags two. The energy-ladder figure below shows this: the rungs are not grouped cleanly by — the rung sits below the rung, so nature climbs to first, then drops back to fill .
  • Filling order per period gives the added electrons:
    • Period 1: → 2
    • Period 2:
    • Period 3:
    • Period 4:
    • Period 5:
    • Period 6:
    • Period 7: Answer: gives the maximum a shell can ever hold; period length is governed by the Aufbau filling order slicing those Pauli-capped subshells differently. Pauli sets each block's width, Aufbau sets when blocks appear.
Figure — Pauli exclusion principle

L4.2

Suppose electrons had three spin states instead of two (). Derive the new "max electrons per shell" formula and give the max for .

Recall Solution

Capacity per orbital = number of spin states = 3. Orbitals per shell (unchanged) . Why does this sum equal ? The terms are the first odd numbers , and (as the L2.2 figure shows) each new odd number wraps an "L-shaped" layer around a growing square, turning an square into an one — so their running total is always a perfect square, . New shell max . For : . Answer: ; for that is 12. (Compare real world: .) This shows the "" in is literally the number of spin states, not something deeper about geometry.


Level 5 — Mastery

L5.1

A hypothetical particle X is a boson (integer spin) rather than a fermion. Do the arguments of the parent note allow two X-particles in the same single-particle state? Justify from the exchange symmetry, and name one real consequence.

Recall Solution

Fermions require the total wavefunction to flip sign on exchange (antisymmetric), which forces when two states coincide → Pauli. Bosons require the wavefunction to stay the same on exchange (symmetric): Set : . Answer: Two bosons in the same state give a perfectly nonzero wavefunction — bosons ignore Pauli. Real consequences (from Fermions and bosons): lasers (many photons in one mode) and Bose–Einstein condensates.

L5.2

A student claims: "Since all electrons in the universe are identical, an electron on Earth and one on the Moon can't share the same four quantum numbers." Is Pauli being applied correctly? Give the precise correction.

Recall Solution

Not correctly. Pauli forbids two electrons from sharing the same single-particle state, and the state includes the spatial wavefunction, not just the quartet of one isolated atom. Two electrons bound to atoms a mile apart occupy states centred at different locations — their spatial parts barely overlap, so the full states are already distinct. There is no clash. The quartet is a bookkeeping shorthand valid within one atom's set of orbitals. Across separate atoms, the position degree of freedom keeps the states distinct automatically. Answer: The claim misapplies Pauli by ignoring the spatial part of the state; the true rule is "no two electrons in the same complete quantum state," which is satisfied trivially for well-separated atoms.

L5.3

Prove algebraically that a completely filled subshell has zero net spin and zero net orbital magnetic contribution from .

Recall Solution

A full subshell of azimuthal number has every orbital doubly occupied. Net spin: each orbital carries one and one , summing to ; over all orbitals, total -sum . Net : the values are , and each is used twice (two electrons per orbital). Their sum: because the values are symmetric about and cancel in pairs . Answer: Both totals are — a filled subshell is spherically bland (no net spin, no net ). This is why noble gases and filled-shell ions are so unreactive and (spin-) non-magnetic.


Connections

  • Quantum numbers — the four labels every exercise manipulates
  • Aufbau principle — filling order behind the L4 period-length problems
  • Hund's rule — resolves the L3 carbon arrangement
  • Fermions and bosons — the boson contrast in L5.1
  • Electron spin — the two-valuedness that caps orbitals at 2
  • Periodic table periodicity and block widths in L4