3.3.27 · D4Rocket Propulsion

Exercises — Turbopump design — centrifugal pump, axial turbine stages, NPSH

2,507 words11 min readBack to topic

Constants used throughout: .


Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1

State, in one line each, which of the three design pillars each quantity belongs to: (a) , (b) , (c) across a rotor row.

Recall Solution
  • (a) — exit whirl velocity of the liquid at the impeller rim → belongs to the centrifugal pump (it sets the Euler head ).
  • (b) — available suction head above vapor pressure → belongs to the NPSH / cavitation pillar (see Cavitation).
  • (c) — change in whirl as gas crosses a rotor row → belongs to the axial turbine stage (work , the Euler Turbomachinery Equation).

L1.2

The Euler pump head is . Without computing anything, say what happens to if we design for no inlet swirl, and why designers usually want that.

Recall Solution

No inlet swirl means ====, so the second term vanishes and . Why designers want it: feeding the liquid in radially/axially means this impeller adds all the whirl, maximising head for a given rim speed and keeping the formula simple.


Level 2 — Application

L2.1

A pump impeller has rim radius and spins at . Find the blade tip speed .

Recall Solution

Convert rpm → rad/s (why: the Euler relations use in rad/s, not rev/min): Blade speed at the rim (why: is the linear speed of a point at radius ):

L2.2

Using the pump above with exit whirl and no inlet swirl, find the Euler head .

Recall Solution

Why this formula: with no inlet swirl the Euler head collapses to — this is exactly energy added per unit weight of liquid, i.e. the whirl work (energy per unit mass) divided by to express it as a column height. We use it here because both (from L2.1) and (given as a fraction of ) are known. . (About 8.6 km of equivalent liquid column — see Bernoulli's Principle for why head is measured this way.)

L2.3

The pumped liquid is LOX, . Convert the head from L2.2 to a pressure rise , and comment on whether a single stage would really be run this hard.

Recall Solution

Why multiply by : head is energy per unit weight; multiply by to get energy per unit volume, which is pressure. Physical realism: 960 bar from one stage is far above what real pumps deliver per stage. Two limits bite first. (i) Tip speed: pushes impeller-rim stresses toward the strength limit of the metal — most pumps keep below , and this problem sits near that ceiling because it combines a small radius with an extreme 40000 rpm. (ii) Cavitation & stage loading: a 960-bar rise concentrated in one impeller is unrealistic; real turbopumps split large rises across multiple stages (the SSME LH₂ pump uses three). Treat this number as an upper-bound sanity figure, not a buildable single stage — the arithmetic is right, the single-stage engineering is not.


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1

A pump must deliver of RP-1 () at . Its efficiency is . Find the shaft power the pump demands.

Recall Solution

Why this formula: hydraulic power added to the fluid is (energy/mass ); dividing by efficiency accounts for real losses inside the pump.

L3.2

The turbine driving that pump is fed hot gas at , , inlet stagnation temperature , pressure ratio , ratio of specific heats , efficiency . Find the turbine power and check whether it can drive the L3.1 pump (assume ).

Recall Solution

Why this formula: the turbine extracts a fraction of the gas's thermal energy set by the isentropic temperature drop; the bracket is that ideal drop fraction, and scales it to the real machine. Exponent: . So , and . Check: the pump needs 4.63 MW but the turbine only makes 1.90 MW ⇒ not enough. The design fails the power match; you must raise , , or . This is exactly how the Gas Generator Cycle gets sized.

L3.3

By what factor must the gas flow increase (holding all else fixed) to meet the L3.1 pump demand?

Recall Solution

, so scale linearly: New gas flow . Why this matters: more gas burned in the gas generator is propellant not going to the main chamber — a direct hit to Specific Impulse.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1

Design check for an LH₂ inlet. Tank pressurised to ; LH₂ vapor pressure ; ; tank sits above the pump; feedline loss . Compute .

Recall Solution

Full Bernoulli, tank surface → pump inlet (see Bernoulli's Principle). Writing every head term: is the total (stagnation) inlet head above vapor pressure, so it keeps the velocity head: rearranging, . The term does not vanish — it is absorbed into the left side and is exactly why NPSH is defined on stagnation rather than static pressure. What survives on the right is the driving margin: Why the inlet velocity head disappears from the final expression: it cancels between the two sides of Bernoulli — the fast-moving inlet fluid trades static pressure for velocity head, but their sum (the stagnation head) is what NPSH tracks, so no separate term remains. Pressure-margin head: . Huge, because for LH₂ is tiny — a small pressure margin becomes a giant column.

L4.2

The bare impeller has . Is the L4.1 design safe? If not, by how much does NPSH need to improve, and name the standard hardware fix.

Recall Solution

Safe operation needs . Here not safe; the impeller eye would drop below vapor pressure and cavitate. Shortfall: . Fix: add an inducer — a slender axial screw ahead of the impeller that gently pre-pressurises the flow, lowering the required so the pump tolerates the low inlet head without a heavier, more-pressurised tank. (Avoiding Cavitation is the whole point.)

L4.3

Instead of an inducer, an engineer proposes raising tank pressure. What makes (all else fixed)? Comment on the cost. The figure below plots against tank pressure so you can see where the design crosses the safety threshold.

Recall Solution

Need to rise by , i.e. the pressure-margin head must go from to . Invert: . Only more tank pressure — sounds cheap, but a higher-pressure tank must be thicker and heavier everywhere, hurting mass fraction. The inducer usually wins; that trade is why turbopumps exist at all.

The plot makes the trade visual: the magenta curve is rising linearly with tank pressure, the dashed violet line is the fixed requirement , the orange dot is the unsafe 2.5-bar design sitting below the line, and the navy dot marks the 2.68-bar break-even where the curve just crosses it.

Figure — Turbopump design — centrifugal pump, axial turbine stages, NPSH

Level 5 — Mastery

L5.1 (limit / edge case)

Show that if the whirl ratio is held fixed, the pump pressure rise scales as . Then find the RPM that would double the L2.3 LOX pressure rise (960 bar → 1920 bar), same impeller.

Recall Solution

. With : Why this dominates design: pressure rise grows with the square of speed — doubling RPM quadruples , which is why impellers scream at tens of thousands of RPM. To double we need to double, i.e. :

L5.2 (degenerate input)

What is the head if the impeller is spun but the exit blades impart zero whirl ()? Interpret physically.

Recall Solution

Physical meaning: spinning fast is useless unless the blades actually turn the flow into tangential motion. Whirl is what carries angular momentum out; with none delivered, no angular-momentum change ⇒ no work ⇒ no head. A radial-tipped blade that lets fluid slip straight through the rim does nothing.

L5.3 (full-system synthesis)

An engine runs RP-1 () at , . The turbine () is fed by a gas generator with , , , , . Find the gas generator flow required, and express it as a percentage of (the "turbine tax").

Recall Solution

Pump power: Turbine must supply (accounting for mechanical losses): Per-unit-mass turbine work: exponent ; ; . Gas flow: Turbine tax: of propellant is spent driving the pump — dumped overboard at low in a Gas Generator Cycle. Routing that gas back into the chamber instead is precisely what the Staged Combustion Cycle does to reclaim it, protecting overall Specific Impulse and Chamber Pressure and Thrust.


Recall Self-test checklist

Which pillar has no in its head formula? ::: The centrifugal pump — (density only enters ). What single Euler relation governs both pump and turbine work? ::: — the pump adds whirl, the turbine removes it. Which term in is huge for LH₂ and why? ::: The pressure-margin head , because is tiny so a small pressure becomes a giant column. Cheapest safe fix when ? ::: Add an inducer to lower , keeping the tank light.