3.2.11 · D5Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics

Question bank — Specific orbital energy ε = −GM - 2a

1,472 words7 min readBack to topic

True or false — justify

True or false: Two satellites in the same orbit but with very different masses have different .
False. is energy per unit mass, so cancels; a feather and a boulder in the identical orbit share one value .
True or false: A satellite moving faster right now must be in a higher-energy orbit.
False. Speed alone is meaningless — it is largest at perigee and smallest at apogee of the same orbit. Only the sum (which is ) ranks orbits by energy.
True or false: The potential energy per mass is negative because the satellite has "lost" energy.
False. The negative sign is a convention: PE is defined zero at infinity, so any finite sits below that reference. Nothing was lost — it just means work is needed to climb out to infinity.
True or false: For a circular orbit the semi-major axis equals the radius .
True. A circle has , so . This is the only case where " is the radius" is correct.
True or false: A higher circular orbit is faster than a lower one.
False. From , larger gives smaller . It has more total energy but stores it as height (PE), leaving less speed (KE).
True or false: If , the orbit is a circle with infinite radius.
False. is a parabola (, an open escape trajectory), not a closed circle. The body coasts to infinity arriving with zero speed.
True or false: Hyperbolic trajectories have a negative semi-major axis.
True. For , solving gives . Negative is the formal fingerprint of an unbound path (see Conic sections in orbits).
True or false: Along one orbit, both kinetic energy per mass and potential energy per mass are constant.
False. Each one changes continuously (they trade back and forth); only their sum stays fixed.
True or false: Doubling the semi-major axis halves the (magnitude of the) specific energy.
True. is inversely proportional to , so makes half as large (i.e. moves closer to zero, less tightly bound).

Spot the error

Find the flaw: ", and since it uses , energy depends on where the satellite is in its orbit."
The error is confusing (a fixed geometric property of the whole ellipse) with (the moving position). never changes during free flight, so is a single constant, independent of position.
Find the flaw: "Escape speed is the speed needed to reach a stable circular orbit."
Escape speed reaches infinity with zero leftover speed, not any orbit. It comes from setting : (see Escape velocity). A stable circular orbit needs less speed, .
Find the flaw: "In vis-viva , for a circle we set ."
A circle sets (not ), giving . Setting would mean sitting at the centre — physically impossible and gives infinity.
Find the flaw: "Since gravity pulls the satellite inward, total mechanical energy must decrease as it falls toward perigee."
Gravity is conservative, so total energy is conserved — it does not decrease. Falling inward converts PE into KE, but the sum is unchanged.
Find the flaw: "A rocket burn that increases speed always raises the apogee, whatever the burn direction."
Only a prograde burn (along the velocity) at perigee raises apogee. A radial or retrograde burn can raise speed momentarily yet lower or reshape the orbit. Direction, not just speed change, determines the new .
Find the flaw: "Because for bound orbits, the satellite has negative kinetic energy somewhere."
Kinetic energy per mass is always . The whole is negative because the negative PE term outweighs the positive KE term; neither piece alone is negative in the wrong way.

Why questions

Why does depend only on and not on the orbit's shape (eccentricity)?
The derivation shows : only the sum of the extreme distances enters, and that sum equals regardless of how squashed or round the ellipse is. Shape controls how energy is split between KE and PE, not the total.
Why do we divide by mass to get the "specific" energy?
So the satellite's own mass cancels, letting one number describe the orbit itself — the same reason all objects fall at the same rate. It makes a property of the trajectory, not of the payload.
Why is angular momentum conservation needed in the derivation but not in the final formula?
We used (from Conservation of angular momentum) only as a tool to eliminate the unknown speeds. Once the speeds are gone, geometry remains and the result depends purely on .
Why does the satellite speed up at perigee and slow down at apogee?
As it falls inward, PE () drops (becomes more negative), and since is fixed, KE must rise, so increases. The reverse happens climbing to apogee — a continuous energy trade.
Why can vis-viva find speed anywhere without knowing the angle around the orbit?
Because is constant, equating links to just and . The angular position is already baked into , so no separate angle is required.
Why does the boundary case correspond exactly to escape?
means the total energy just barely reaches the zero reference at infinity — the body arrives at with . Any less energy () traps it; any more () leaves speed to spare (see Escape velocity).

Edge cases

Edge case: What is in the limit ?
. This is the parabolic escape boundary: the orbit is no longer closed and the body just reaches infinity with zero speed.
Edge case: What does a negative semi-major axis physically mean?
It signals a hyperbolic (unbound) flyby with . The "" is now the distance parameter of the hyperbola's geometry, not a loop size, and no apogee exists.
Edge case: In the vis-viva equation, what happens to as for a fixed elliptical orbit?
, so speed blows up. Physically the orbit would have to pass through the centre — impossible for a real orbit around a finite body, which is why perigee stays above the surface.
Edge case: Can two completely different orbit shapes share the same ?
Yes. Any ellipse (however eccentric) with the same semi-major axis has identical — a nearly circular orbit and a highly elongated one can be energy-twins. This underlies why Kepler's Third Law (period depends only on ) works.
Edge case: For a Hohmann transfer orbit, where along the transfer ellipse is largest?
Nowhere — is the same at every point of that single ellipse. Only KE and PE individually vary; the transfer's total specific energy is one fixed number set by its own .
Edge case: If a burn instantaneously doubles the speed at perigee of a bound orbit, does the orbit stay bound?
Not necessarily. Doubling quadruples KE; if the new becomes , the orbit becomes parabolic or hyperbolic and the body escapes.

Recall One-line summary of every trap here

Energy is a per-mass, whole-orbit constant set solely by ; speed and PE at a point are just how that fixed budget is momentarily split. Sign of names the conic; and are the escape/unbound regimes.