2.5.17 · D4Optics

Exercises — Polarization — Malus's law, Brewster's angle derivation

2,358 words11 min readBack to topic

Reminder of what the letters mean (earned before use):

  • = the intensity of light entering a stage. "Intensity" = how much light energy hits a detector per second per area — the brightness the detector reads.
  • = intensity leaving that stage.
  • = the angle between the light's polarization direction (the line its electric field wiggles along) and the polarizer's transmission axis (the one direction the filter lets through).
  • = refractive index of a medium: a number saying how much the medium slows and bends light. Air , water , glass .

Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution L1.1

WHAT kind of input? Unpolarized — points in every transverse direction randomly. WHY not Malus directly? Malus needs a single angle . Unpolarized light has no single angle; it is an even mix of all of them. So we average over a full turn, which gives . The output is now polarized along this polarizer's axis (important for the next problems).

Recall Solution L1.2

Brewster's law is , where is the medium light goes into and the medium it comes from. That's the equation. (Solving it: — done fully in L2.)

Recall Solution L1.3

WHY zero? : the wiggle is entirely perpendicular to the slot, so no component lies along the axis. This is a crossed polarizer.


Level 2 — Application

Recall Solution L2.1

Step 1: Step 2 (WHY we can get for free): at Brewster's angle the reflected and refracted rays are perpendicular, so Check with Snell: ✓.

Recall Solution L2.2

Through A: angle , so (A is aligned — nothing lost). Through B: light leaving A is polarized along A's axis, so it meets B at :

Recall Solution L2.3

Step 1 (A): input unpolarized → halve: , now polarized along A. Step 2 (B): polarized light meets B at :


Level 3 — Analysis

Figure — Polarization — Malus's law, Brewster's angle derivation
Recall Solution L3.1

Angles between consecutive polarizers are what matter — this is the key idea in the figure above. After A: unpolarized halved → , polarized at . After B: angle from A to B is : Light is now polarized along B (at ). After C: angle from B () to C () is :

Recall Solution L3.2

A → B: angle , so (A aligned, no loss at A). B → C: C is at , B at , so the angle between them is : WHY light reappears: with no middle filter the field along C's axis is zero. The middle filter re-projects the field onto a slanted axis, giving it a nonzero component along C. Maximize: use , so . This peaks when , i.e. , giving


Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution L4.1

(a) Air → water: (b) The glare is polarized horizontally; the glasses pass vertical. Angle between them is : They block all of the Brewster-reflected glare. (c) At the reflected ray is 100% polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence — that plane is vertical for a horizontal lake, so the polarization is horizontal. A vertical filter is exactly crossed with it, so glare is killed while ordinary (partly vertical) scenery light survives.

Recall Solution L4.2

After A: . After B: . Set equal to threshold: Any larger dims the output below threshold, so .


Level 5 — Mastery

Figure — Polarization — Malus's law, Brewster's angle derivation
Recall Solution L5.1

(a) From glass to air: (into air), (from glass): This equals the earlier refraction angle — the picture above shows why the internal Brewster ray retraces the external refracted ray. (b) WHY exactly : and are reciprocals. Since , the two angles are complementary. (c) The external refracted ray and the internal Brewster ray are the same line by ray reversibility: a ray refracted into the glass at Brewster incidence is, run backwards, a ray leaving the glass at its Brewster angle.

Recall Solution L5.2

The reflected beam is already polarized (horizontal), so we do not halve it — use Malus with real angles. Reflected beam: , polarized at (horizontal). Through P1 (at ): angle from beam to P1 is : Light is now polarized along P1 (at ). Through P2 (at ): angle from P1 () to P2 () is : Final:


Recall summary

Recall One-line answers (cover them)

Unpolarized through one polarizer? ::: , output polarized along the axis. Malus angle between consecutive filters, not from the first? ::: True — each filter re-polarizes the light. Brewster angle air→glass ()? ::: . Why do vertical sunglasses kill lake glare? ::: Brewster glare is horizontal, crossed at with vertical. and the reverse-direction sum to? ::: (reciprocal tangents). Max output of crossed polarizers with a middle one? ::: at the middle angle .


Connections