2.4.6 · D5 · HinglishThermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics (Advanced)
Question bank — Phase equilibrium — Clausius-Clapeyron equation
2.4.6 · D5· Physics › Thermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics (Advanced) › Phase equilibrium — Clausius-Clapeyron equation
True or false — justify
Ek – diagram par har phase-coexistence curve ka slope positive hota hai.
False. Slope hai ; hamesha, lekin negative ho sakta hai (ice→water mein volume ghatta hai), isliye ice-melting curve peeche ki taraf jhukti hai. Dekho Phase Diagrams and Triple Point.
Coexistence par dono phases ki entropy equal honi chahiye.
False. Dono phases equal , , aur share karte hain — kabhi equal entropy nahi. Asliyat mein difference hi slope drive karta hai; equal entropy ka matlab hoga .
Coexistence par dono phases ki Gibbs free energy per mole equal honi chahiye.
True. hi coexistence ki poori definition hai, aur hi molar Gibbs energy hai. Agar ye alag hoti, to matter lower- phase ki taraf flow karta jab tak ek phase khatam na ho jaaye.
Clausius-Clapeyron equation sirf ek approximation hai.
False. Exact form thermodynamically rigorous hai. Approximation vapour form hai (jo additionally ideal gas aur negligible liquid volume assume karta hai).
Agar latent heat double kar do, to coexistence curve ka slope bhi double ho jaata hai.
True (fixed aur par). directly, isliye bada heat-of-transition curve ko steeper banata hai — har degree ke liye zyada pressure change chahiye.
ka ke against (na ki ke against) plot evaporation ke liye straight line hai.
False. ka ke against plot straight hota hai, slope ke saath, kyunki . ke against plot karo to curve aata hai.
Latent heat constant hai, isliye vapour integrated form hamesha exact hai.
False. genuinely ke saath vary karta hai (critical point ke paas zero ki taraf girta hai). ko constant treat karna sirf modest temperature ranges par valid ek convenience hai.
Spot the error
"Melting ice ke liye, use karo ."
Error: woh form assume karta hai ki ek phase ideal vapour hai (). Solid aur liquid dono condensed hain, isliye exact use karo real molar volumes ke saath.
", aur kyunki ice bada hai isliye ye positive hai, to slope positive hai."
Error: ko ki direction se match karna chahiye. Agar woh heat hai jo water→ice jaate waqt absorb hoti hai... lekin freezing heat release karti hai, isliye melting ka , ice→water ke liye hai aur . Dono quantities ko ek hi direction ke liye rakho.
"Kyunki , main koi bhi heat ko se divide kar sakta hoon."
Error: relation ke liye heat reversibly aur isothermally transfer honi chahiye. Sirf transition temperature par reversible latent heat count karti hai; ek irreversible splash of heat se zyada entropy deta hai.
" mein, term first law se aaya."
Error: aur survive karte hain kyunki first-law substitution ne aur terms ko cancel kar diya. Do surviving terms cancellation ke baad ke bache hue hain, naa ki first-law inputs. Dekho First Law of Thermodynamics.
"Pressure badhane se liquid ka boiling point hamesha badhta hai."
Error (ek universal law ke roop mein). Normal liquids ke liye haan, lekin logic yeh hai ki sirf isliye kyunki (gas, liquid se bada hai). Ye ka sign hai, naa ki koi magic rule, jo decide karta hai.
"Vapour form deta hai , isliye slope bina kisi limit ke badhne par grow karta hai."
Error: derivation isse bahut pehle breakdown ho jaati hai. Critical point ke paas ab negligible nahi rehta, vapour ab ideal nahi rehta, aur . Formula sirf critical temperature se kaafi neeche trustworthy hai.
Why questions
Coexistence condition plane mein ek curve kyun hai, filled region kyun nahi?
Single equation do variables par ek constraint hai, jisse ek free parameter bachta hai — ek one-dimensional curve. Ek area ke liye chahiye hoga ki ek 2-D patch par ho, jo impossible hai jab tak phases identical na hon.
Phase equilibrium ko (na ki ya ) kyun govern karta hai?
Phase transitions fixed aur fixed par hote hain, aur hi woh free energy hai jo exactly un dono constraints ke under minimise hoti hai (iske natural variables aur hain, jo se dikhta hai).
"Hotter phase ka volume zyada hota hai" wali naive expectation zyaatatar positive slope kyun deti hai?
Hotter phase (liquid ke upar gas, solid ke upar liquid) ka usually zyada hota hai, isliye ; aur ke saath ye banata hai. Paani ki solid–liquid line exception hai kyunki ice, water se less dense hai.
Coexistence curve par move karte waqt hum kyun equate kar sakte hain?
Kyunki curve par har point par hold karta hai. Agar do functions par equal hain aur par bhi equal hain, to un points ke beech unke infinitesimal changes bhi equal hone chahiye.
–vs– fit latent heat ko itne cleanly kyun measure karta hai?
Vapour form integrate hokar straight line deta hai jiska slope hai. Do points slope fix kar dete hain, isliye — ek linear fit se poora thermodynamic quantity. Dekho Latent Heat.
Pressure ice ka melting point kyun giraata hai lekin water ka boiling point kyun badhata hai?
Dono follow karte hain . Melting mein hai (ice→water mein volume ghatta hai) → negative slope → zyada matlab kam melt . Boiling mein → positive slope → zyada matlab zyada boil .
aur ko ek hi transition direction ke liye kyun lena chahiye?
Slope ek ratio hai; ek ki direction flip karo doosre ki nahi to iska sign flip ho jaata hai aur ek falsely negated slope milta hai. Dono "final minus initial" hain ek consistent choice ke liye ki kaunsa phase "final" hai. Linked idea: Entropy and the Second Law.
Edge cases
Agar curve par kisi point par ho to ka kya hoga?
Slope vertical (infinite) tak blow up karta hai — coexistence curve momentarily – plane mein seedha upar chali jaati hai. Physically wahan dono phases ka molar volume identical hai.
critical temperature par coexistence curve ka kya hota hai?
Phases indistinguishable ho jaate hain: aur saath mein, curve simply critical point par khatam ho jaati hai, aur vapour approximation collapse ho jaati hai (liquid volume ab negligible nahi rehta).
Triple point par kitne Clausius-Clapeyron slopes milte hain?
Teen coexistence curves (solid–liquid, liquid–vapour, solid–vapour) milte hain, har ek ka apna slope hai. Wahan unka sublimation heat fusion plus vaporisation heat ke equal hota hai. Dekho Phase Diagrams and Triple Point.
Solid–vapour (sublimation) line ke liye kya hai, uससे milne wali dono doosri curves se compare karke?
, kyunki energetically sublimation = pehle melt phir boil. Ye sublimation curve ko triple point ke theek neeche vaporisation curve se steeper banata hai.
Agar ho (ek "second-order"-jaisi transition jisme koi latent heat nahi), to Clausius-Clapeyron kya predict karta hai?
— flat slope — lekin bhi ke saath formula genuinely ban jaata hai aur inapplicable ho jaata hai; aisi transitions ke liye Maxwell Relations se built Ehrenfest relations chahiye.
Bahut kam pressure par sublimation ke liye, kya ideal-gas vapour approximation boiling se better ya worse hai?
Better. Kam par vapour zyada dilute hota hai, isliye ye Ideal Gas Law zyada closely follow karta hai, aur solid ke comparison mein itna enormous hota hai ki extremely accurate hota hai.
Kya coexistence curve kabhi zero slope (perfectly horizontal) le sakti hai?
Sirf tab agar ho jabki — horizontal line matlab badhne par pressure unchanged hai aur phases coexisting hain. Ordinary first-order transitions mein , isliye truly horizontal segment occur nahi hoti.
Recall Aage badhne se pehle ek-line self-test
Jawab dhako aur re-derive karo: ice line exception kyun hai? ::: Kyunki (ice less dense hai), jo ke sign ko negative kar deta hai.