Intuition What this page is for
The parent note gave you the one formula that runs this whole topic:
Δ t ′ = − c 2 γ v Δ x .
Here we don't learn anything new — we stress-test it. We push every knob to every setting: positive separation, negative separation, zero separation, zero speed, speed creeping toward light-speed, a real-world word problem, and an exam trap. By the end you will have seen every case class and never meet a scenario you weren't shown.
Before the examples, let us re-earn every symbol so a reader arriving cold can follow line one.
Definition The six symbols, in plain words
v — the speed of frame S ′ relative to frame S , measured along one straight line we call the x -axis. Think "how fast the train slides past the platform." Always a fraction of c here.
c — the speed of light , 3 × 1 0 8 metres per second. The one speed every observer agrees on. It is the reason this whole effect exists (see Postulates of Special Relativity ).
Δ x = x 2 − x 1 — the spatial gap between the two events, measured in frame S (the frame where they happen at the same time). If event 2 is farther along the + x direction than event 1, Δ x is positive.
Δ t = t 2 − t 1 — the time gap between the two events measured in frame S . On this whole page (except where we say otherwise) our events are simultaneous in S , which means Δ t = 0 . Keep this symbol in mind; it returns in the causality example.
γ (gamma) — the stretch factor 1 − v 2 / c 2 1 . It is always ≥ 1 . At v = 0 it is exactly 1 ; as v → c it blows up to infinity. It answers "by how much do time and space warp at this speed?" (see Time Dilation , Length Contraction ).
Δ t ′ = t 2 ′ − t 1 ′ — the time gap between the same two events, but now measured in the moving frame S ′ . If it comes out negative, event 2 happened before event 1 in S ′ .
Every question this topic can ask lives in one of these cells. The examples below are labelled with the cell they fill.
#
Case class
What is being tested
Example
A
Δ x > 0 , ordinary v
positive separation, sign of Δ t ′
Ex 1
B
Δ x < 0
negative separation flips the sign
Ex 2
C
Δ x = 0 (degenerate)
same place → no disagreement
Ex 3
D
v = 0 (degenerate)
no relative motion → no disagreement
Ex 3
E
v → c (limiting)
γ → ∞ , gap blows up
Ex 4
F
Real-world word problem
translate words → symbols
Ex 5
G
"Who is first / by how much" (train)
apply leading-clocks-lag
Ex 6
H
Exam twist: wrong-frame Δ x trap
which frame's separation to use
Ex 7
I
Ordering / causality check
spacelike vs timelike, can order flip?
Ex 8
We use c = 3 × 1 0 8 m/s throughout.
Before the numbers, look at what relativity of simultaneity looks like on a spacetime diagram — a graph with position across and time up.
Intuition What the figure shows
The horizontal navy dashed line is frame S 's line of "now" (constant t ): both purple event dots sit on it, so in S they are simultaneous (Δ t = 0 ).
The tilted magenta line is frame S ′ 's line of "now." Because S ′ moves, its notion of "same time" is slanted . The two events do not sit on the same magenta line — that slant is Δ t ′ made visible.
The front event (right dot) lies below the back event's magenta line, meaning S ′ assigns it an earlier time. That is "leading clock lags," drawn.
The steeper the boost speed v , the more the magenta line tilts — more tilt = bigger Δ t ′ . This is the geometric twin of the algebra you are about to grind through.
Worked example Example 1 — Cell A: positive separation
A train is L = 240 m long. It moves at v = 0.6 c in the + x direction. In the platform frame S , the back (event 1, at x 1 ) and front (event 2, at x 2 = x 1 + 240 ) are struck by lightning simultaneously (so Δ t = 0 in S ). Find Δ t ′ in the train frame S ′ .
Forecast: The front is in the direction of motion, so "leading clock lags" says the front event should register earlier in the train frame. Guess: Δ t ′ is negative, a fraction of a microsecond. On the figure, look at where the two dots meet the tilted magenta "now" line.
Δ x = x 2 − x 1 = + 240 m , and Δ t = 0 (simultaneous in S ).
Why this step? We must fix a sign convention and confirm the key assumption. Event 2 = front, farther in + x , so Δ x is positive; simultaneous means the boxed formula applies.
γ = 1 − 0. 6 2 1 = 0.64 1 = 0.8 1 = 1.25 .
Why this step? The formula needs γ ; it converts the raw speed into the warp factor.
Δ t ′ = − c 2 γ v Δ x = − c 2 ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 c ) ( 240 ) = − c ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 240 ) = − c 180 .
Why this step? One factor of c cancels between v = 0.6 c and c 2 , leaving metres over c .
Δ t ′ = − 3 × 1 0 8 180 = − 6.0 × 1 0 − 7 s = − 0.60 μ s .
Why this step? Divide metres by c to land in seconds.
Verify: Sign is negative → front (event 2) happened first in S ′ . That matches "leading clocks lag" and the tilt of the magenta line in the figure. Units: m / ( m/s ) = s . ✅
Worked example Example 2 — Cell B: negative separation flips the sign
Same train, same v = 0.6 c , events still simultaneous in S (Δ t = 0 ), but now we label the front as event 1 and the back as event 2 . So event 2 is behind. Find Δ t ′ .
Forecast: We only relabelled — no physics changed. The magnitude must stay 0.60 μ s , but because Δ x now points the other way, the sign should flip to positive .
Δ x = x 2 − x 1 = x back − x front = − 240 m .
Why this step? Event 2 is now the back, which sits at smaller x , so the difference is negative.
γ = 1.25 (unchanged — speed didn't change).
Why this step? γ depends only on v , not on labels.
Δ t ′ = − c 2 ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 c ) ( − 240 ) = + c 180 = + 6.0 × 1 0 − 7 s = + 0.60 μ s .
Why this step? The minus in the formula times the minus in Δ x gives a plus.
Verify: Δ t ′ > 0 means event 2 (back) happens later , i.e. the front happens first — exactly the same physical story as Example 1, told with swapped labels. Magnitude identical. ✅ The lesson: the sign lives entirely in your choice of which event is "2".
Worked example Example 3 — Cells C & D: the two degenerate cases
(C) Two firecrackers explode at the same point in S : Δ x = 0 , Δ t = 0 , v = 0.6 c .
(D) Two firecrackers explode 240 m apart in S and simultaneously (Δ t = 0 ), but S ′ has zero speed : Δ x = 240 , v = 0 .
Find Δ t ′ in each.
Forecast: Both should give exactly zero disagreement — one because there is no separation to disagree over, the other because there is no motion to cause the disagreement.
(C) Δ t ′ = − c 2 γ ( 0.6 c ) ( 0 ) = 0 .
Why this step? The whole effect is proportional to Δ x . Kill Δ x , kill the effect. Same-place events are simultaneous for everyone.
(D) γ = 1/ 1 − 0 = 1 , and Δ t ′ = − c 2 ( 1 ) ( 0 ) ( 240 ) = 0 .
Why this step? With v = 0 the frames are the same frame, so of course simultaneity is preserved.
Verify: Both zero. These two cells are your sanity anchors — any formula you write must collapse to no-disagreement in these limits. ✅
Worked example Example 4 — Cell E: the ultra-relativistic limit
v → c
Take a fixed separation Δ x = 240 m with events simultaneous in S (Δ t = 0 ), and watch Δ t ′ as v climbs: 0.6 c , 0.9 c , 0.99 c , and the limiting trend as v → c .
Forecast: γ blows up as v → c , so the disagreement should grow without bound — approaching infinity, never reaching a finite ceiling.
At v = 0.6 c : γ = 1.25 , ∣Δ t ′ ∣ = c ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 240 ) = c 180 = 6.0 × 1 0 − 7 s .
Why this step? Baseline from Example 1.
At v = 0.9 c : γ = 1/ 1 − 0.81 = 1/ 0.19 ≈ 2.294 . ∣Δ t ′ ∣ = c ( 2.294 ) ( 0.9 ) ( 240 ) = c 495.6 ≈ 1.652 × 1 0 − 6 s .
Why this step? Same formula, higher speed — watch the number climb.
At v = 0.99 c : γ = 1/ 1 − 0.9801 ≈ 7.089 . ∣Δ t ′ ∣ = c ( 7.089 ) ( 0.99 ) ( 240 ) = c 1684.3 ≈ 5.614 × 1 0 − 6 s .
Why this step? Notice the jump — near c , the product γ v races upward.
As v → c : γ → ∞ , so ∣Δ t ′ ∣ → ∞ .
Why this step? 1 − v 2 / c 2 → 0 in the denominator; nothing bounds the gap.
Verify: Look at the orange curve — it turns sharply upward and shoots to the sky near the dashed v = c wall. The three coloured dots are exactly the values from steps 1–3. The disagreement is unbounded, confirming step 4. ✅
Worked example Example 5 — Cell F: real-world word problem
A 12 , 000 km long fibre-optic cable lies along the + x direction on Earth. Two maintenance pulses are sent so that, in Earth's frame , they enter the two ends at the same instant (Δ t = 0 in Earth's frame). A spacecraft flies over the cable, front-to-back, at v = 0.5 c . In the spacecraft's frame, which end's pulse enters first, and by how much?
Forecast: The spacecraft moves in + x (toward the far end, event 2). Leading clock lags → the far end pulse should enter first in the ship frame. Magnitude: the separation is huge (1.2 × 1 0 7 m ), so expect a big gap — tens of milliseconds.
Δ x = 1.2 × 1 0 7 m , Δ t = 0 in Earth's frame (near end = event 1 at x 1 , far end = event 2 at x 2 > x 1 ).
Why this step? Convert km to m, set the sign (far end at larger x ), and note simultaneity holds so the boxed formula applies.
γ = 1/ 1 − 0.25 = 1/ 0.75 ≈ 1.1547 .
Why this step? Speed is 0.5 c ; get the warp factor.
Δ t ′ = − c 2 ( 1.1547 ) ( 0.5 c ) ( 1.2 × 1 0 7 ) = − 3 × 1 0 8 ( 1.1547 ) ( 0.5 ) ( 1.2 × 1 0 7 ) .
Why this step? Plug in; cancel one c .
Δ t ′ = − 3 × 1 0 8 6.928 × 1 0 6 ≈ − 2.31 × 1 0 − 2 s ≈ − 23.1 ms .
Why this step? Do the division; land in seconds, then convert to milliseconds.
Verify: Negative sign → far end (event 2) first, matching the forecast. Magnitude ≈ 23 ms — large because the cable is enormous, exactly as predicted. Units: m / ( m/s ) = s . ✅
Worked example Example 6 — Cell G: "who first, by how much" (train, forecast-then-verify)
A train 500 m long passes a station at v = 0.8 c . The station says the front and back doors open simultaneously (Δ t = 0 in the station frame). In the train frame, which door opens first, and by how much?
Forecast: Front is the leading end; "leading clock lags" means the front event is assigned an earlier time in the moving frame. So the front door opens first. Guess magnitude: a couple of microseconds. On the figure, the front dot sits below the tilted magenta "now" line.
Δ x = + 500 m , Δ t = 0 (front = event 2, ahead in + x ; simultaneous in station frame).
Why this step? Set the sign so the front is event 2 and confirm the assumption.
γ = 1/ 1 − 0.64 = 1/ 0.36 = 1/0.6 ≈ 1.6667 .
Why this step? Standard warp factor at 0.8 c .
Δ t ′ = − c 2 ( 1.6667 ) ( 0.8 c ) ( 500 ) = − c ( 1.6667 ) ( 0.8 ) ( 500 ) = − c 666.7 .
Why this step? Cancel one c ; keep track of the minus.
Δ t ′ = − 3 × 1 0 8 666.7 ≈ − 2.22 × 1 0 − 6 s = − 2.22 μ s .
Why this step? Divide by c .
Verify: Negative → front (event 2) earlier → front door first , matching the corrected forecast and the tilt in the figure. This is the resolution of the parent's Einstein-train story turned into a number. ✅
Worked example Example 7 — Cell H: the wrong-frame trap
A rod is 200 m long in its own rest frame S ′ . It flies past you at v = 0.6 c . Both ends are struck simultaneously in your frame S (Δ t = 0 in S ). A classmate computes Δ t ′ = − γ v ( 200 ) / c 2 . What did they get wrong, and what is the correct answer?
Forecast: The formula demands Δ x in the frame where the events are simultaneous — that is your frame S , not the rod's rest frame. The 200 m is the rod's rest length, so in S the rod is length-contracted and shorter. Guess: the classmate's number is too big by exactly γ .
Correct Δ x in S : the rod is contracted, Δ x = γ 200 .
Why this step? From Length Contraction , a rest length L 0 appears as L 0 / γ in the frame where it moves.
γ = 1.25 (as in Ex 1), so Δ x = 200/1.25 = 160 m .
Why this step? Numerically contract the length.
Correct Δ t ′ = − c 2 γ v Δ x = − c 2 ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 c ) ( 160 ) = − c 120 = − 4.0 × 1 0 − 7 s = − 0.40 μ s .
Why this step? Now every quantity is in the right frame.
The classmate's wrong value: − c ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 200 ) = − c 150 = − 5.0 × 1 0 − 7 s — bigger by the factor 200/160 = 1.25 = γ .
Why this step? Show exactly how the mistake inflates the answer.
Verify: 0.50 μ s = γ × 0.40 μ s = 1.25 × 0.40 μ s . ✅ The trap is real and off by precisely γ . Always use the separation in the frame where events are simultaneous.
Worked example Example 8 — Cell I: can the order actually reverse? (causality check)
Two events in frame S are simultaneous (Δ t = t 2 − t 1 = 0 ) and separated by Δ x = 240 m . (a) Are they spacelike or timelike separated? (b) Could any observer see event 1 cause event 2?
Forecast: Simultaneous but separated means light couldn't have crossed the gap in zero time — so they must be spacelike separated, and no causal link is possible. Their time-order is frame-dependent (can flip), but that's harmless.
The spacetime interval squared: s 2 = ( c Δ t ) 2 − ( Δ x ) 2 = ( c ⋅ 0 ) 2 − ( 240 ) 2 = − ( 240 ) 2 < 0 .
Why this step? Here Δ t = 0 is the time separation in S (the symbol we defined up top). A negative s 2 (with this sign convention) defines a spacelike separation — see Causality and the Light Cone .
For a signal to link them, light would need to travel 240 m in Δ t = 0 seconds — impossible, since that demands speed ∞ > c .
Why this step? No signal at or below c can connect them, so neither can cause the other.
Because they are spacelike, their order can flip between frames (Examples 1 & 2 already showed the sign of Δ t ′ changing with labelling), and that is fine — nothing causal was ever at stake.
Why this step? Confirms the parent note's promise: only spacelike pairs flip, and those cannot influence each other, so no paradox.
Verify: s 2 = − 57600 m 2 < 0 → spacelike, confirmed. Order-flip allowed, causality safe. ✅
Recall Quick self-test
Front and back of a 300 m train (v = 0.6 c ) struck simultaneously in the platform frame. Gap in the train frame? ::: ∣Δ t ′ ∣ = γ v Δ x / c 2 = ( 1.25 ) ( 0.6 c ) ( 300 ) / c 2 = 225/ c = 7.5 × 1 0 − 7 s = 0.75 μ s ; front strikes first.
What assumption makes Δ t ′ = − γ v Δ x / c 2 valid? ::: The events are simultaneous in S , i.e. Δ t = 0 ; otherwise use the full γ ( Δ t − v Δ x / c 2 ) .
Which frame's Δ x goes in the formula? ::: The frame where the two events are simultaneous.
As v → c with Δ x fixed, what happens to Δ t ′ ? ::: It grows without bound because γ → ∞ .
If Δ x = 0 , what is Δ t ′ in every frame? ::: Zero — same-place events are absolutely simultaneous.
Mnemonic Matrix in one line
"Sign from Δ x , size from γ v , zero from either Δ x = 0 or v = 0 , infinity as v → c , and only spacelike pairs flip."
Back to the parent: Simultaneity — relativity of simultaneity .