Exercises — Simultaneity — relativity of simultaneity

The spacetime diagram below (used in L4.2 and L5) shows how the same two events reorder when you tilt to a moving frame's line of simultaneity.

Level 1 — Recognition
L1.1
Two events happen at the same point in space in frame , one second apart. A rocket flies past at . Do the two events stay in the same time-order for the rocket observer?
Recall Solution
What we test: whether spatial separation is what drives disagreement. Here . The simultaneity gap needs a nonzero to act, but more directly these events are timelike (same place, real time gap → light easily connects them). Timelike order is preserved in all frames. So yes, same order for the rocket — the earlier event stays earlier. The rocket sees a longer gap (that's Time Dilation), but never a flip.
L1.2
In frame , event A is at and event B is at , and both occur at (simultaneous). Frame moves in the direction. Using "leading clocks lag," which event does record as happening first?
Recall Solution
What we test: reading the sign without plugging numbers. Map onto Figure s01: A is the back B (at ), B is the front F (at ). Look at the amber clock — the front clock lags, so in the front event B happens first. Check with the signed formula (event 2 B, event 1 A): , so . A negative signed gap means : B occurs earlier. ✅
Level 2 — Application
L2.1
A train of proper length moves at . In the platform frame the front and back are struck by lightning simultaneously. Find the time gap in the train frame (with sign, then magnitude).
Recall Solution
Step 1 — get (why: the formula needs it). Step 2 — plug into the signed gap formula. Let event 2 front (larger ), event 1 back. is the separation in the platform frame where events are simultaneous — exactly what the formula wants. Step 3 — numbers. The negative sign (amber clock in Figure s01 lags) says the front bolt is recorded first in the train frame; its magnitude is .
L2.2
Same train, but now . Without redoing everything, does the gap grow or shrink, and what is its new value?
Recall Solution
Reasoning first: both and increase, so the gap grows. . So — larger than the at , as predicted. Sign still negative: front bolt first.
Level 3 — Analysis
L3.1
In frame , event A is at and event B at . Frame moves at . Compute and separately, then their difference, and confirm the sign matches "leading clock lags."
Recall Solution
Why compute each separately: it shows the gap isn't a trick — it drops out of the full Lorentz Transformation . . Difference: (i.e. ). Negative → B (the leading event, the amber clock in Figure s01) happens before A in . ✅ Matches the rule.
L3.2
A rod's length is measured as in the ground frame (where the rod moves at in ). Two flashes go off simultaneously in the rod's own rest frame , one at each end. Find the time gap between the flashes as seen from the ground — including which flash occurs first.
Recall Solution
The subtlety: the flashes are simultaneous in the rod frame , so in the formula must be the rest length (proper length) , not the contracted ground-frame 300 m. Step 1 — undo length contraction to get . Length contraction: , so . . Step 2 — apply the signed gap formula. Take event 2 the flash at the front end (larger , the direction of motion), event 1 the rear flash, so . Which flash first? The sign is negative, so : the front (leading) flash occurs first in the ground frame , by . This is the amber clock in Figure s01 again.
Level 4 — Synthesis
L4.1
A spaceship of proper length flies at . In the ship frame, clocks at the nose and tail read the same time (synchronised). According to the ground, which clock is ahead, by how much, and does this agree with "leading clocks lag"?
Recall Solution
Frame bookkeeping (staying with the top-of-page convention). The convention is: is the frame where the two events are simultaneous. Here the nose- and tail-"same reading" events are simultaneous in the ship, so for this problem the ship plays the role of and the ground plays , with the ground moving at in the direction relative to the ship (equivalently, the ship moves past the ground). We only ever call "" the simultaneous frame — that is exactly the top-of-page rule, applied consistently. , (separation in , the ship). Which is ahead? By "leading clocks lag" (amber clock in Figure s01), the nose (front, in the direction of ship motion) clock reads behind, so the tail clock is ahead by as read from the ground. ✅
L4.2
Two events in : A at , B at . A frame moves at . (a) Are these events spacelike or timelike? (b) Compute . Does the time-order flip?
Recall Solution
(a) Classify (why: only spacelike events can flip order — see the tilted line in Figure s02 and Spacetime Diagrams). , , so . Since , the events are spacelike — light can't get from one to the other. Order-flipping is allowed. (b) Full transform (both events have nonzero , so use the general signed formula, not the simultaneous shortcut): . Positive and small: B is still after A, no flip here. In Figure s02 the line of simultaneity hasn't yet tilted past B. Push higher and it can flip: the flip needs , i.e. . Numerically .
Level 5 — Mastery
L5.1
Find the speed at which the events of L4.2 (, ) become simultaneous in , and prove no faster frame is needed than the speed of light.
Recall Solution
Condition: . Since , we need As a fraction of : , i.e. . In Figure s02 this is exactly the tilt that lays the line of simultaneity through both A and B. A valid sub-light frame exists precisely because the pair is spacelike (). If they'd been timelike, this formula would demand — impossible — which is why causal order can never be flipped.
L5.2
A muon detector experiment: in the ground frame two detectors 600 m apart fire "simultaneously" (, ). A cosmic-ray muon travels between them at . (a) In the muon's frame, what is the time gap between the two firings (signed)? (b) Interpret the sign.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — (why: ultra-relativistic, expect large ). Step 2 — signed gap formula with event 2 the detector the muon flies toward (larger ), in the ground frame where they're simultaneous: (b) Sign: negative → the leading detector (larger , the one the muon flies toward) fires first in the muon frame — the amber clock in Figure s01 once more. A modest 600 m gap in space blows up into a time gap because of the enormous and near- speed. Same physics as the Time Dilation muon-lifetime result, seen from the simultaneity side.
L5.3 — the edge case
Repeat L5.2, but now number the detectors so that event 2 is the one the muon flies away from (the trailing detector). Then . Compute and show it is consistent with L5.2.
Recall Solution
Why this matters: the sign of is just a labelling choice; the physics (which detector fires first) must not change. This is the missing edge case. Now , meaning : event 2 (the trailing detector) fires later, i.e. the front/leading detector still fires first. Identical physics to L5.2 — only the bookkeeping label flipped. Rule: a positive (event 2 leads) gives a negative (event 2 first); a negative (event 2 trails) gives a positive (event 1 first). Either way, the leading event happens first — exactly the amber clock in Figure s01.
Recall One-line self-check before you close
The trigger for disagreement ::: nonzero spatial separation (in the simultaneous frame). The formula's hidden assumption ::: events are simultaneous in , i.e. . Sign of vs order ::: means event 2 (larger ) happens first. If you flip the labels so ::: flips sign but the leading event still fires first. When order can flip ::: only for spacelike pairs (). Which clock reads behind ::: the leading one (front, in the direction of motion) — amber clock, Figure s01.