1.8.25 · D5Electromagnetism
Question bank — Magnetic flux Φ = ∫B·dA
True or false — justify
Every field line that enters a closed surface must also leave it.
True. Magnetic field lines form closed loops with no start or end (no monopoles), so for any closed surface.
A very strong magnetic field always gives large flux through a loop.
False. If the loop is edge-on (), and flux is zero no matter how strong is — orientation matters as much as strength.
Flux is a vector because it is built from the vectors and .
False. The dot product collapses the two vectors into a single number, so is a scalar (it has magnitude and sign, but no direction).
The angle in is the angle between the field and the surface plane.
False. It is the angle between and the surface normal . "Normal's the boss."
Doubling the number of turns in a coil doubles the flux through one turn.
False. The flux through each single turn is unchanged; what doubles is the flux linkage , which is what appears in Faraday's EMF.
Flux can be negative.
True. If the field enters the "back" of the surface, , so — the sign encodes which way lines pierce relative to the chosen normal.
Reversing the chosen direction of flips the sign of but not its magnitude.
True. Flipping replaces by , so ; the magnitude of flux is a physical fact, the sign is a bookkeeping convention.
Flux through a flat surface is proportional to the projected area that faces the field.
True. Only the projection of the area onto the plane perpendicular to catches lines; .
Spot the error
"The loop is perpendicular to the field, so and ."
Error: "perpendicular to the field" describes the loop's plane; the normal is then parallel to , so and (maximum), not zero.
"Since is uniform, I can always write and skip the integral."
Error: only holds when the field is also perpendicular to a flat surface. In general you still need , and a curved surface or non-uniform field forces the integral.
"By Gauss's law, the enclosed magnetic charge equals the flux through a closed surface."
Error: there is no magnetic charge. The magnetic Gauss's law is always — the right side is fixed at zero, unlike the electric case.
"The field lies flat in the plane of the loop, so lots of lines pass through."
Error: lines lying in the plane skim along the surface and pierce nothing. Here (normal ), giving .
"Flux is measured in teslas because it comes from the field ."
Error: flux is field times area, so its unit is the weber (). Tesla is the unit of alone.
"To find flux through a hemisphere in a uniform field, I must integrate over the curved dome."
Error (avoidable work): flux through the curved cap equals flux through its flat circular rim, because in a uniform field over the closed surface (cap + disc). Use the easy flat disc.
"A bigger loop always has bigger flux than a smaller one in the same field."
Error: only if both catch the same field orientation. A large loop held edge-on has zero flux while a small face-on loop has positive flux.
Why questions
Why is flux a dot product rather than a plain product ?
Because only the part of the field along the normal pierces the surface; the dot product automatically extracts that perpendicular component and discards the sliding-along part.
Why must the flux through any closed surface be exactly zero, not just small?
Because magnetic field lines are unbroken closed loops — every line that goes in comes back out. There is no monopole inside to act as a source or sink, so the ins and outs cancel exactly.
Why do we chop the surface into tiny patches for the general case?
So that over each patch the field is essentially constant and the simple rule applies; summing and taking the limit (the integral) rebuilds the true total for varying fields or curved surfaces.
Why does flux, not the field itself, appear in Faraday's law?
Because induced EMF responds to the change in how many lines thread the loop — that count is the flux. A changing , a changing area, or a changing tilt can all drive it, and flux packages all three.
Why is the direction of chosen as the normal to the surface?
The normal is the one direction that measures how "face-on" the patch is to the field; projecting the field onto it gives the true line-piercing contribution, which is exactly what flux should count.
Why does tilting a loop reduce its flux?
Tilting shrinks the projected area that faces the field, so fewer lines pass through; at the projection vanishes and flux hits zero.
Edge cases
A loop is oriented exactly edge-on (). What is the flux and why?
Zero. , so — the lines run parallel to the surface and none pierce it.
The field strength is zero everywhere on the surface. What is the flux?
Zero. With , the integrand at every patch regardless of orientation, so .
The surface has zero area (a point or a line). What is the flux?
Zero. With summing to nothing there is no area for lines to cross; trivially.
The normal makes an angle just above (say ) with . What happens to the sign of ?
becomes slightly negative, so crosses smoothly from positive to negative as the loop tips past edge-on — the field now enters through the chosen "back" of the surface.
A closed spherical surface sits in a uniform field. What is the total flux?
Exactly zero. In a uniform field every line entering one side exits the other; more fundamentally holds for all closed surfaces.
The field points straight along the surface's normal and is uniform over a flat area . What fraction of the maximum flux is this?
The full maximum, . Here , , so — every line pierces head-on.
As a loop rotates steadily from face-on to edge-on, how does its flux behave at the two ends?
It starts at the maximum (rate of change zero there) and falls to at edge-on; because , the flux changes fastest near and slowest near .
Related: Gauss's Law for Magnetism · Electric Flux · Lenz's Law · Magnetic Field B · Inductance · Surface and Line Integrals