1.8.16 · D5Electromagnetism
Question bank — Ohm's law — microscopic origin, resistivity
Before we start, three words you must own (every question below leans on them):
True or false — justify
Ohm's law is a fundamental law of nature like Newton's laws.
False. It is an approximation that holds only when is independent of ; diodes, plasmas and hot filaments are non-ohmic and break it.
If you double the voltage across an ohmic wire, the drift velocity doubles.
True. and , so — the whole chain from voltage to drift is linear (as long as stays fixed).
Resistivity of a copper sample depends on how long and thick the wire is.
False. depends only on the material (, , ). Length and area enter resistance via , never itself.
The random thermal motion of electrons contributes to the current.
False. Thermal velocities point every direction and average to zero net flow; only the small drift carries current.
In steady state, electrons in a wire move with constant acceleration.
False. They move with constant average velocity . Between collisions they accelerate, but each collision resets the gain, so the drift is steady, not the acceleration.
Cooling a metal wire lowers its resistance.
True. Colder lattice vibrates less → fewer collisions → rises → falls, so falls too.
For semiconductors, heating always raises resistance just like metals.
False. In semiconductors heating frees far more carriers, so grows fast and falls — the opposite trend (see Semiconductors vs metals).
A lamp lights instantly only because electrons travel from switch to bulb very fast.
False. Drift speed is ~ m/s (snail-slow). The field/signal that sets every electron drifting propagates near light speed, so all electrons start almost at once.
Conductivity increases if you apply a stronger electric field.
False. has no in it — that -independence is exactly what makes the material ohmic.
Spot the error
"A constant force acts on the electron, so by its speed grows without limit, hence current grows forever."
The electron is not free — collisions every erase the accumulated velocity. The balance between field-gain and collision-loss gives a steady , so current is constant, not runaway.
"Since and is tiny, the current in a household wire must be tiny too."
The carrier density – is enormous, and it multiplies . A vast number of slow carriers still delivers amperes.
", so resistivity is inversely proportional to the electron's charge."
Charge appears squared (), not to the first power — so . The square comes from entering once in the force and once in the current density.
"Resistance rises with temperature because the electrons themselves get heavier when hot."
Mass is fixed. It's that shrinks: hotter ions vibrate more, collisions happen more often, so drops and rises.
"Two identical wires in series have half the resistance of one, because charge has two paths."
Series wires share one path, so lengths add — resistance doubles. Two paths (halving) is the parallel arrangement (see Resistors in series and parallel).
"In the minus sign means the current flows opposite to ."
The minus sign means the electrons drift opposite to (they're negative). Conventional current (with ) still points along — the two minus signs cancel in the current.
Why questions
Why does a longer wire have more resistance, in microscopic terms?
A longer wire means an electron must cross more lattice on its way through, encountering proportionally more collision-causing scattering "in series" — scales with .
Why does the drift velocity stay constant instead of climbing during each free flight?
It does climb during a single free flight, but we average over many flights: each collision drops the electron back to zero drift, so the ensemble average is the fixed .
Why is independent of the crucial fact, rather than just " and both appear"?
If depended on , then would be nonlinear and would not be proportional to . The constancy of is what makes the relation linear — i.e. Ohm's law.
Why can we say collisions "randomize" velocity rather than "stop" it?
A collision scatters the electron into a random direction, so its drift contribution averages to zero afterward — but its fast thermal speed is unchanged. It forgets the field-gained velocity, not all its energy.
Why does the field inside a current-carrying wire stay non-zero even though it's a conductor?
A static conductor has zero internal field, but a current-carrying one must sustain to keep pushing the drifting electrons against collisions (see Electric field inside a conductor).
Edge cases
What happens to as area (an infinitely fat wire)?
: infinitely many parallel paths, so no resistance — the wire behaves like a perfect connection.
What is the drift velocity the instant before you switch on the field ()?
: with no field there is no net drift, though electrons still zip around thermally with zero average.
If the relaxation time (collisions infinitely frequent), what happens to ?
: constant scattering never lets any drift build up, so the material becomes a perfect insulator to current.
If free-carrier density , does the material conduct?
No: , so . With no carriers there is nothing to drift, regardless of the field.
At a fixed voltage, what limits the current in a real filament as it glows hot?
Rising temperature shortens , raising and hence ; so current falls as it heats — this -dependent behaviour is exactly why a lamp filament is non-ohmic.
For a superconductor (idealized , no scattering), what is ?
: with no collisions the drift never resets, so current flows with zero resistance — but this is outside the ordinary Drude picture.
Recall One-line survival kit
Constant force but constant velocity (not acceleration) because collisions brake every ::: yes = material only; adds geometry ::: yes Ohm's law = " has no in it" = linearity ::: yes Metals: heat up → down → up. Semiconductors: heat up → up → down ::: yes
Connections
- Parent: Ohm's law microscopic origin
- Drude model of conduction
- Electric current and current density
- Electric field inside a conductor
- Temperature dependence of resistance
- Semiconductors vs metals
- Resistors in series and parallel
- Drift and diffusion of carriers
- Joule heating — power dissipation