1.7.4 · D4Thermodynamics

Exercises — Specific heat capacity — calorimetry

2,498 words11 min readBack to topic

Throughout we use the two tools built in the parent note:


Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution L1.1

WHAT we want: , given , , . Straight use of . WHY: the substance only warms (no melting/boiling), so this single formula covers it. (A gap in °C equals the same gap in K.)

Recall Solution L1.2

WHAT: = heat to warm the whole object by 1 K, so mass is baked in. WHY: — the "per kg" is removed by multiplying by the kilograms present.

Recall Solution L1.3

WHAT: such that (same heat capacity). WHY: water equivalent replaces the object with an "equally lazy" lump of water.


Level 2 — Application

Recall Solution L2.1

WHAT: heat leaving the water, so we expect (heat out). WHAT IT MEANS: the minus sign says flowed out. The magnitude of heat released is .

Recall Solution L2.2

WHAT: solve for . WHY divide by : is the object's heat capacity ; dividing energy by "energy per degree" gives degrees.

Recall Solution L2.3

PREDICT: equal masses, equal ⇒ plain average ⇒ °C. VERIFY with the weighted-average formula: The cancels top and bottom:


Level 3 — Analysis

Recall Solution L3.1

Figure — the tug-of-war:

Figure — Specific heat capacity — calorimetry
WHAT: hot metal cools , cold water warms . WHY set them equal: insulated cup ⇒ metal's heat loss = water's heat gain. Heat gained by water: Heat lost by metal: Set :

Recall Solution L3.2

WHY closer to 80: the 0.30 kg body has the larger heat capacity , so it "wins the tug-of-war" and drags toward its own temperature. Factor out : Indeed °C is closer to 80 than to 20. ✓

Recall Solution L3.3

WHY not the plain average: equal masses but unequal — water's larger gives it more "pull," so leans toward water's 25 °C. Heat capacities: water , oil . Note: below the plain average °C, exactly as predicted (water pulls it down).


Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution L4.1

WHAT changed: now water AND cup both warm from 18 to 22, so both appear on the heat-gained side. WHY: the cup is in thermal contact — ignoring it undercounts the heat absorbed and biases low. Set equal to heat lost by metal: Compare to L3.1 (): including the cup raises the answer, because more heat was truly absorbed than water alone explained.

Recall Solution L4.2

WHY a general weighted average: with three bodies and no heat leaving, the final temperature is the -weighted average of all three starting temperatures. Heat capacities:

  • water A: , at 15
  • water B: , at 60
  • Al: , at 90 Check: lies between 15 and 90 ✓, and the big cold water (837.2) dominates, pulling low toward 15–32 range ✓.
Recall Solution L4.3

WHAT: water equivalent turns the cup's into an equal mass of water. WHY useful: now everything is "water," so heat capacities scale purely with mass. Treat the cup as kg of water at 20 °C mixing with kg water at 90 °C:


Level 5 — Mastery

Recall Solution L5.1

WHAT: both start equal, . Heat flow: each , so for both — no heat moves. Equal temperatures = thermal equilibrium already; heat only flows across a temperature difference.

Recall Solution L5.2

WHY intuition first: the lake's heat capacity () dwarfs the pebble's (), so barely moves from 10 °C. LIMIT: as one body's , it acts as a thermal reservoir — its temperature sets and stays essentially fixed. This is the idealisation behind a "heat bath."

Recall Solution L5.3

WHY it's impossible: is a weighted average of 30 and 50, so it must lie between them. lies outside — a sure sign the student swapped "lost" and "gained" (a sign error). Correct value (equal , equal ⇒ plain average):

Recall Solution L5.4

WHAT: unknown is the cold mass . Same cancels. Heat lost by hot water = heat gained by cold water: Cancel : Check: the cold body is 3× heavier, so sits closer to the cold 20 than to hot 80 ✓.


Recall Self-test summary — reveal only after attempting all

L1: kJ; J/K; kg. L2: released kJ; K; °C. L3: ; °C; °C. L4: ; °C; kg, °C. L5: , ; °C; °C; kg.

Connections