1.5.14 · D3 · Physics › Rotational Mechanics › Rolling KE = ½mv² + ½Iω²
Yeh page Rolling KE ka exhaustive workbook hai. Parent note ne tumhe formula diya tha
K E = 2 1 M v c m 2 + 2 1 I c m ω 2 = 2 1 M v c m 2 ( 1 + β ) , β = M R 2 I c m .
Yahan hum har tarah ka problem cover karenge jisme yeh formula aata hai — har shape, woh slipping case jahan v = ω R , degenerate "point mass" limit, ek energy-loss twist, aur ek real-world word problem. Kuch bhi "khud samajh lena" ke liye nahi chhoda gaya.
Intuition Har symbol ka matlab (use karne se pehle)
M = body ki total mass (kilograms). Socho "kitna stuff move ho raha hai."
v c m = center of mass (balance point) ki speed jab woh zameen par chalti hai.
ω = spin rate radians per second mein: body apne center ke around kitni tezi se ghoomti hai. Ek poora chakkar 2 π radians hota hai.
I c m = center ke around moment of inertia — ek number jo batata hai "is shape ko spin karna kitna mushkil hai," Moment of Inertia se build hota hai.
β = I c m / ( M R 2 ) = ek pure shape number (koi units nahi). Ring = 1 , disc = 2 1 , solid sphere = 5 2 , hollow sphere = 3 2 .
R = rolling body ki radius.
Har rolling-KE problem in case classes mein se ek (ya blend) hota hai. Har cell ke liye neeche kam se kam ek worked example hai.
Cell
Case class
Kya special hai
Covered by
A
Pure energy split, given v
Ek known speed se dono KEs
Ex 1 (ring)
B
Charon standard shapes
Shapes mein β compare karo
Ex 2
C
Incline from rest
PE → rolling KE, v solve karo
Ex 3
D
Race / ordering
Mass aur radius cancel ho jaate hain
Ex 4
E
Slipping (constraint broken)
v = ω R , dono alag chahiye
Ex 5
F
Degenerate limits
β → 0 (point mass) aur β → ∞
Ex 6
G
Energy-loss twist
Rolling phir rough patch — friction energy hataata hai
Ex 7
H
Real-world word problem
Units, given power/mass, speed nikalo
Ex 8
I
Reverse problem
Given KE split, shape (β ) nikalo
Ex 9
Worked example Ex 1 — (Cell A) Rolling ring ka energy split
Ek ring jiska mass M = 4 kg hai, v c m = 2 m/s par rolling without slipping kar rahi hai. Total KE, translational KE, aur rotational KE nikalo.
Forecast: Ring "worst spinner" hai — iska aadha energy spin mein locked hona chahiye. Guess: rotational KE = translational KE.
Step 1 — β identify karo. Ring ⇒ β = 1 . Yeh step kyun? Compact formula ko sirf β hi shape input chahiye.
Step 2 — Total KE. K E = 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) = 2 1 ( 4 ) ( 2 2 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 2 1 ( 4 ) ( 4 ) ( 2 ) = 16 J . Kyun? K E = 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) ka direct plug-in.
Step 3 — Split karo. Translational = 2 1 M v 2 = 2 1 ( 4 ) ( 4 ) = 8 J . Rotational = 16 − 8 = 8 J . Kyun? 2 1 M v 2 term "1" wala part hai; β wala part spin hai.
Verify: Rotational fraction = β / ( 1 + β ) = 1/2 , matlab 16 ka 50% = 8 J ✓. Forecast confirm hua: spin equals slide.
Worked example Ex 2 — (Cell B) Same speed, chaar shapes
Ring, disc, solid sphere, hollow sphere — sab ka M = 1 kg , sab v = 1 m/s par rolling kar rahe hain. Inki total KE rank karo.
Forecast: Zyada spin cost = same forward speed par zyada total KE. Toh ring ki KE sabse zyada honi chahiye, sphere ki sabse kam.
Step 1 — β list karo. Ring 1 , disc 2 1 , solid sphere 5 2 , hollow sphere 3 2 . Kyun? Moment of Inertia ke standard results se.
Step 2 — K E = 2 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 + β ) = 2 1 ( 1 + β ) apply karo. Kyun? M = v = 1 hone se KE sirf β par depend karta hai.
Ring: 2 1 ( 2 ) = 1.0 J
Hollow sphere: 2 1 ( 1.6667 ) = 0.8333 J
Disc: 2 1 ( 1.5 ) = 0.75 J
Solid sphere: 2 1 ( 1.4 ) = 0.70 J
Step 3 — Rank karo. Ring > hollow sphere > disc > solid sphere.
Verify: β ka order = KE ka order, bilkul forecast jaisa — bada β same v par zyada energy carry karta hai ✓.
Worked example Ex 3 — (Cell C) Disc ramp se rest se neeche
Ek solid disc rest se h = 1.4 m ki height se rolling without slipping neeche aata hai. g = 10 m/s 2 lo. Neeche v c m nikalo.
Forecast: Frictionless slide se slower, 2 g h = 28 ≈ 5.29 m/s , kyunki kuch PE spin ban jaati hai.
Step 1 — Conservation of energy. M g h = 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) (dekho Conservation of Energy on Inclines ). Kyun? Rolling without slipping matlab contact point slide nahi karta, isliye friction koi work nahi karta — saari PE rolling KE mein convert hoti hai.
Step 2 — M cancel karo, v solve karo. v = 1 + β 2 g h . Kyun? Mass dono sides par aata hai, isliye cancel ho jaata hai — answer mass-independent hai.
Step 3 — Disc, β = 2 1 . v = 1.5 2 ( 10 ) ( 1.4 ) = 1.5 28 = 18.6 6 ≈ 4.32 m/s .
Verify: 4.32 < 5.29 ✓ (slide se slower). Units: m 2 / s 2 = m/s ✓.
Worked example Ex 4 — (Cell D) Race — mass aur radius kyun matter nahi karte
Ek heavy large disc aur ek light small disc ko same height se saath release kiya jaata hai. Neeche pehle kaun pahunchega?
Forecast: Log guess karte hain "heavy wala" ya "bada wala." Trap hai.
Step 1 — v likho. Dono discs hain: v = 1 + β 2 g h dono ke liye β = 2 1 . Kyun? β sirf shape par depend karta hai, size ya mass par nahi.
Step 2 — Notice karo kya absent hai. M aur R v mein kahin nahi aate. Kyun? M Ex 3 ke Step 2 mein cancel hua; R kabhi aaya hi nahi kyunki β = I c m / M R 2 ne usse absorb kar liya.
Step 3 — Conclude karo. Same β ⇒ neeche identical v ⇒ tie hai .
Verify: h = 1.4 plug karo, dono 4.32 m/s dete hain chahe M , R kuch bhi ho ✓. Forecast (heavy/big jeetega) galat tha — correct kiya.
Worked example Ex 5 — (Cell E) SLIPPING: constraint broken
Ek disc (M = 2 kg , R = 0.1 m ) ko ice par ω = 20 rad/s tak spin kiya gaya jabki center sirf v c m = 1 m/s par move kar raha hai. Ice par yeh slips karta hai: v = ω R . Total KE nikalo.
Forecast: Kyunki ω R = 2 m/s = v = 1 m/s , hum compact 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) formula nahi use kar sakte. Dono energies alag-alag use karni hongi.
Step 1 — Constraint check karo. Rolling Without Slipping ke liye v = ω R chahiye. Yahan ω R = ( 20 ) ( 0.1 ) = 2 = 1 . Yeh step kyun? Compact formula secretly v = ω R assume karta hai; isse violate karne par woh formula galat ho jaata hai.
Step 2 — Translational KE. 2 1 M v 2 = 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 1 2 ) = 1 J . Kyun? Yeh term sirf v c m use karta hai, slipping ho ya na ho.
Step 3 — Rotational KE. I c m = 2 1 M R 2 = 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 0. 1 2 ) = 0.01 kg⋅m 2 ; 2 1 I ω 2 = 2 1 ( 0.01 ) ( 2 0 2 ) = 2 J . Kyun? Rotational KE hamesha true ω use karta hai, jo yahan v se independent hai.
Step 4 — Add karo (König's theorem abhi bhi valid hai). K E = 1 + 2 = 3 J .
Verify: Agar hum galti se compact formula use karte, 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 1 ) ( 1.5 ) = 1.5 J — aadha galat, kyunki usne ω R = v force kiya ✓ (dikhata hai kyun slipping par split karna zaroori hai).
Worked example Ex 6 — (Cell F)
β ke degenerate limits
Rolling speed v = 2 g h / ( 1 + β ) do extremes mein kya ban jaati hai: (a) β → 0 (ek "point mass" bead), aur (b) β → ∞ (saari mass ek massless rim par bahut door)?
Forecast: β → 0 frictionless block jaisa behave karna chahiye (2 g h ); β → ∞ zero speed ki taraf crawl karna chahiye.
Step 1 — Case β → 0 . v → 1 + 0 2 g h = 2 g h . Kyun? Koi moment of inertia nahi matlab spin par koi energy divert nahi — pure sliding block hai.
Step 2 — Case β → ∞ . v = 1 + β 2 g h → 0 . Kyun? Saari PE rotation mein chali jaati hai; center ko aage move karne ke liye almost kuch nahi bachta.
Step 3 — Sanity ordering. Finite shapes ke liye, 0 < β < ∞ , isliye 0 < v < 2 g h hamesha — rolling hamesha in bounds ke beech rahegi.
Verify: h = 1.4 , g = 10 se: β = 0 ⇒ 28 ≈ 5.29 ; β = 1000 ⇒ 28/1001 ≈ 0.167 → 0 ✓. Har real shape (ring 4.32 ? nahi—3.74 ; disc 4.32 ; sphere 4.47 ) ( 0 , 5.29 ) ke andar hai ✓.
Worked example Ex 7 — (Cell G) Energy-loss twist
Ek solid sphere without slipping v = 3 m/s par roll kar raha hai (M = 2 kg ), ek aise patch se takraata hai jahan briefly skids karta hai aur apni saari rotational KE friction mein de deta hai, phir re-grip karta hai. Maanlo skid ke dauran forward speed v unchanged rahi, toh original total KE ka kitna fraction bachta hai?
Forecast: Sphere apni zyaadatar energy translation mein rakhta hai (β = 5 2 chhota hai), isliye usse sirf ek modest slice khoona chahiye.
Step 1 — Original total KE. 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) = 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 9 ) ( 1.4 ) = 12.6 J . Kyun? Skid se pehle standard rolling KE.
Step 2 — Khoya hua rotational part. Fraction 1 + β β = 1.4 0.4 = 7 2 , toh K E r o t = 12.6 × 7 2 = 3.6 J remove hoti hai. Kyun? Problem kehta hai rotational KE skid se dissipate hoti hai.
Step 3 — Surviving KE. 12.6 − 3.6 = 9.0 J , matlab fraction 9.0/12.6 = 5/7 ≈ 0.714 . Kyun? Jo bachta hai woh exactly translational share 1/ ( 1 + β ) hai.
Verify: Translational KE = 2 1 ( 2 ) ( 9 ) = 9 J survivor se match karta hai ✓; 7 5 + 7 2 = 1 ✓; sphere 71.4% rakhta hai, ring ke 50% se zyada — forecast holds ✓.
Worked example Ex 8 — (Cell H) Real-world word problem
Ek go-kart wheel (solid disc maano, M = 3 kg , R = 0.25 m ) rolling without slipping kar raha hai. Ek motor is ek wheel ko rest se steadily 63 W power deliver karta hai. 2 s baad wheel ka center kitni tezi se move kar raha hai, agar saari delivered energy rolling KE ban jaaye?
Forecast: Power × time energy hai; rolling-KE formula se speed mein convert karne par kuch m/s milne chahiye.
Step 1 — Delivered energy. E = P t = 63 × 2 = 126 J . Kyun? Power energy per second hai; time t tak steady power se E = P t milta hai.
Step 2 — Rolling KE ke barabar set karo. 126 = 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) disc β = 2 1 ke saath: 126 = 2 1 ( 3 ) v 2 ( 1.5 ) = 2.25 v 2 . Kyun? Saari input energy KE ban jaati hai (given), isliye equate karo.
Step 3 — Solve karo. v 2 = 126/2.25 = 56 , v = 56 ≈ 7.48 m/s . Kyun? v isolate karo.
Verify: Units: J / kg = m 2 / s 2 = m/s ✓. Check back: 2.25 × 56 = 126 J ✓. Radius R kabhi matter nahi kiya — Cell D ke saath consistent.
Worked example Ex 9 — (Cell I) Reverse problem — shape nikalo
Ek rolling body (M = 5 kg , v = 4 m/s ) ki total KE = 56 J measure hoti hai. Shape identify karo.
Forecast: Translational KE M , v se fix hai; "extra" humein β batata hai, isliye shape bhi.
Step 1 — Translational KE. 2 1 M v 2 = 2 1 ( 5 ) ( 16 ) = 40 J . Kyun? Yeh part sirf M , v par depend karta hai, shape par nahi.
Step 2 — β extract karo. Total = 40 ( 1 + β ) = 56 ⇒ 1 + β = 1.4 ⇒ β = 0.4 = 5 2 . Kyun? Compact formula 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) hai; translational part divide kar do.
Step 3 — Match karo. β = 5 2 solid sphere hai. Kyun? Shape table mein sirf solid sphere ka β = 2/5 hota hai.
Verify: Solid sphere: 2 1 ( 5 ) ( 16 ) ( 1.4 ) = 56 J ✓. Rotational fraction = 1.4 0.4 = 7 2 ≈ 28.6% , parent ke table se match karta hai ✓.
Recall Quick self-test
Ek body slipping ke saath roll kar rahi hai. Kya tum 2 1 M v 2 ( 1 + β ) use kar sakte ho? ::: Nahi — woh formula v = ω R assume karta hai. Slipping mein, true alag ω ke saath 2 1 M v 2 + 2 1 I c m ω 2 use karo.
β → 0 hone par height h se rolling speed kya ho jaati hai? ::: 2 g h — frictionless-slide value (spin par koi energy nahi jaati).
Given total KE aur M , v , shape kaise nikaalte ho? ::: 2 1 M v 2 compute karo; phir β = 2 1 M v 2 K E − 1 ; β ko table se match karo.
Kya heavier ya larger wheel downhill race mein same shape wale se jeet jaata hai? ::: Nahi — tie hota hai; v sirf β par depend karta hai, M ya R par nahi.
Mnemonic Matrix ek saans mein
"Split when it slips, shape sets the speed, size never counts."