1.3.10 · D4Work, Energy & Power

Exercises — Efficiency

2,595 words12 min readBack to topic

The one tool for the whole page: where (the Greek letter "eta", said ay-ta) is a pure number between and . Multiply by to make it a percentage. Everywhere below take unless told otherwise.


Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution

What we want: the fraction of the that became useful air-motion. Why divide: by definition , and both numbers are already powers in the same unit (watts), so no conversion is needed. The missing leaked out as heat — that is why fan motors feel warm (see Heat and Internal Energy).

Recall Solution

Why use : the parent identity rearranges to . Three-quarters of everything you feed this machine is thrown away.


Level 2 — Application

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Find the useful energy. The useful job is raising the crate, so useful energy = gravitational PE gained (see Gravitational Potential Energy): Why this is the useful part: the height gained is exactly what we paid the crane to achieve. Step 2 — Divide by input. The lost became heat in the cables and gears (Friction).

Recall Solution

Why rearrange: we know and the output, but want the input. Start from and flip it: Sanity check: input () is bigger than output () — good, a real machine always needs to be fed more than it usefully returns.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Convert to one unit. (kilo means ). Why the power form: the question gives power, not energy. Since input and output share the same time, cancels and (see Work and Power). Step 2 — Multiply.


Level 3 — Analysis

Recall Solution

(a) . (b) By conservation, input splits into useful + wasted: (c) Energy = power × time. Over hours: Why kWh works directly: a kilowatt-hour is literally "kilowatts multiplied by hours," so no unit gymnastics are needed.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Useful energy first. Only of the input reaches the load: Step 2 — Convert that PE into a height. The useful energy is , so solve for : Why we used , not : the wasted joules never lifted the mass, so plugging in would over-predict the height.

Recall Solution

Why raw joules mislead: Y produces more useful energy (), but it also eats far more. Efficiency normalises away size (that is the whole point of the ratio), letting us compare fairly. X is more efficient, even though Y does more total work.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution

Why multiply: each stage's output becomes the next stage's input, so the surviving fraction of energy is multiplied stage by stage (parent note: chained efficiencies multiply). Trace units of fuel through the chain in the figure below.

Figure — Efficiency

Lesson: the total () is below the smallest single stage (). Weak links drag the whole chain down.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Useful energy. . Step 2 — Set it equal to kinetic energy. All useful energy becomes motion, so . Step 3 — Solve for . Why take a square root: is buried inside a square, so undoing the square (the inverse operation) frees it.

Recall Solution

(a) Going output → input, divide by : (b) Wasted = input − useful: Check: . Consistent with the waste-fraction identity.


Level 5 — Mastery

Recall Solution

(a) PE released per second = input power. Per second, falls : Why "per second" makes it a power: energy divided by the one-second interval is exactly power (Work and Power). (b) Turbine output. (c) After the cables (a second stage at ). The two identical stages combine to , not — chaining always costs more than any single stage suggests.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Wasted power. , i.e. of heat every second. Step 2 — Heat → temperature. The energy to raise temperature is (see Heat and Internal Energy). Rearrange for the rise per second, using in one second: Why efficiency mattered: the temperature rise is driven purely by the wasted fraction — a more efficient drill would heat up more slowly.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — Required useful energy. . Step 2 — Compute the implied efficiency. Step 3 — Judge it. is impossible — it would mean more useful energy came out than the total energy put in, breaking Conservation of Energy. So the claim is bogus: either the input is understated or the lift is overstated. Real machines always give ; the true limit for heat-based engines is even stricter (see Heat Engines & Carnot Efficiency).


Flashcards

Output → input: multiply or divide by η?
Divide (input is larger, so dividing by a number below 1 grows it).
Three stages 40%, 90%, 85% in series — overall?
Multiply: 0.40×0.90×0.85 = 30.6%.
A 65%-efficient winch fed 5000 J drives a 10 kg trolley — final speed?
v = √(2·3250/10) = √650 ≈ 25.5 m/s.
Why is a claimed 107% efficiency impossible?
It would need more useful energy out than total energy in, violating conservation of energy.
Wasted power 200 W into 0.2 kg, c = 500 — temperature rise per second?
ΔT = 200/(0.2×500) = 2 °C/s.

Recall Feynman: the ladder in one breath

L1 just spots "useful ÷ in." L2 rearranges it to hunt a missing quantity. L3 makes you compare fractions instead of raw joules. L4 chains machines — energy gets cut again and again, so you multiply, never average. L5 fuses efficiency with motion, heat, and the iron rule that nothing beats . Same one formula the whole way up — only the surrounding physics grows.


Connections

Solution Map

L1

L2

L3

L4

L5

rule

guard

Formula eta = useful over in

Recognise the fraction

Rearrange for unknown

Compare and back-solve

Chain stages multiply

Fuse with motion heat limits

Multiply never average

eta cannot exceed 100 percent