The one tool for the whole page:
η=Etotal inEuseful out=PinPuseful out=1−EinEwasted
where η (the Greek letter "eta", said ay-ta) is a pure number between 0 and 1. Multiply by 100 to make it a percentage. Everywhere below take g=10m/s2 unless told otherwise.
What we want: the fraction of the 70W that became useful air-motion.
Why divide: by definition η=Puseful/Pin, and both numbers are already powers in the same unit (watts), so no conversion is needed.
η=7042=0.6=60%
The missing 70−42=28W leaked out as heat — that is why fan motors feel warm (see Heat and Internal Energy).
Recall Solution
Why use 1−η: the parent identity η=1−Ewasted/Ein rearranges to Ewasted/Ein=1−η.
EinEwasted=1−0.25=0.75=75%
Three-quarters of everything you feed this machine is thrown away.
Step 1 — Find the useful energy. The useful job is raising the crate, so useful energy = gravitational PE gained (see Gravitational Potential Energy):
Euseful=mgh=120×10×5=6000JWhy this is the useful part: the height gained is exactly what we paid the crane to achieve.
Step 2 — Divide by input.η=80006000=0.75=75%
The lost 2000J became heat in the cables and gears (Friction).
Recall Solution
Why rearrange: we know η and the output, but want the input. Start from η=Euseful/Ein and flip it:
Ein=ηEuseful=0.69kJ=15kJSanity check: input (15) is bigger than output (9) — good, a real machine always needs to be fed more than it usefully returns.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — Convert to one unit.4kW=4000W (kilo means ×1000).
Why the power form: the question gives power, not energy. Since input and output share the same time, t cancels and η=Puseful/Pin (see Work and Power).
Step 2 — Multiply.Puseful=ηPin=0.80×4000=3200W
(a)η=5030=0.6=60%.
(b) By conservation, input splits into useful + wasted:
Pwasted=Pin−Puseful=50−30=20kW(c) Energy = power × time. Over 2 hours:
Ewasted=20kW×2h=40kWhWhy kWh works directly: a kilowatt-hour is literally "kilowatts multiplied by hours," so no unit gymnastics are needed.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — Useful energy first. Only 70% of the input reaches the load:
Euseful=ηEin=0.70×2100=1470JStep 2 — Convert that PE into a height. The useful energy is mgh, so solve for h:
h=mgEuseful=30×101470=3001470=4.9mWhy we used Euseful, not Ein: the wasted joules never lifted the mass, so plugging in 2100 would over-predict the height.
Recall Solution
Why raw joules mislead: Y produces more useful energy (630>150), but it also eats far more. Efficiency normalises away size (that is the whole point of the ratio), letting us compare fairly.
ηX=200150=0.75=75%,ηY=900630=0.70=70%X is more efficient, even though Y does more total work.
Why multiply: each stage's output becomes the next stage's input, so the surviving fraction of energy is multiplied stage by stage (parent note: chained efficiencies multiply). Trace 100 units of fuel through the chain in the figure below.
ηtotal=0.40×0.90×0.85=0.306=30.6%Lesson: the total (30.6%) is below the smallest single stage (40%). Weak links drag the whole chain down.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — Useful energy.Euseful=0.65×5000=3250J.
Step 2 — Set it equal to kinetic energy. All useful energy becomes motion, so 21mv2=3250.
Step 3 — Solve for v.Why take a square root:v is buried inside a square, so undoing the square (the inverse operation) frees it.
v=m2Euseful=102×3250=650≈25.5m/s
Recall Solution
(a) Going output → input, divide by η:
Pin=ηPuseful=0.754.5=6kW(b) Wasted = input − useful:
Pwasted=6−4.5=1.5kWCheck:1.5/6=0.25=1−η. Consistent with the 1−η waste-fraction identity.
(a) PE released per second = input power. Per second, 2000kg falls 40m:
Pin=tmgh=12000×10×40=800,000W=800kWWhy "per second" makes it a power: energy divided by the one-second interval is exactly power (Work and Power).
(b) Turbine output.Pturbine=0.90×800=720kW(c) After the cables (a second stage at 90%).Ptown=0.90×720=648kWηtotal=0.90×0.90=0.81=81%
The two identical 90% stages combine to 81%, not 90% — chaining always costs more than any single stage suggests.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — Wasted power.Pwasted=(1−η)Pin=0.40×500=200W, i.e. 200J of heat every second.
Step 2 — Heat → temperature. The energy to raise temperature is Q=mcΔT (see Heat and Internal Energy). Rearrange for the rise per second, using Q=200J in one second:
ΔT=mcQ=0.2×500200=100200=2∘C per secondWhy efficiency mattered: the temperature rise is driven purely by the wasted fraction — a more efficient drill would heat up more slowly.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — Required useful energy.Euseful=mgh=4×10×8=320J.
Step 2 — Compute the implied efficiency.η=300320≈1.07=107%Step 3 — Judge it.η>100% is impossible — it would mean more useful energy came out than the total energy put in, breaking Conservation of Energy. So the claim is bogus: either the input is understated or the lift is overstated. Real machines always give η<100%; the true limit for heat-based engines is even stricter (see Heat Engines & Carnot Efficiency).
Divide (input is larger, so dividing by a number below 1 grows it).
Three stages 40%, 90%, 85% in series — overall?
Multiply: 0.40×0.90×0.85 = 30.6%.
A 65%-efficient winch fed 5000 J drives a 10 kg trolley — final speed?
v = √(2·3250/10) = √650 ≈ 25.5 m/s.
Why is a claimed 107% efficiency impossible?
It would need more useful energy out than total energy in, violating conservation of energy.
Wasted power 200 W into 0.2 kg, c = 500 — temperature rise per second?
ΔT = 200/(0.2×500) = 2 °C/s.
Recall Feynman: the ladder in one breath
L1 just spots "useful ÷ in." L2 rearranges it to hunt a missing quantity. L3 makes you compare fractions instead of raw joules. L4 chains machines — energy gets cut again and again, so you multiply, never average. L5 fuses efficiency with motion, heat, and the iron rule that nothing beats 100%. Same one formula the whole way up — only the surrounding physics grows.