1.3.7 · D5Work, Energy & Power
Question bank — Non-conservative forces — friction, air drag
Before the questions, three anchors so every symbol below is already earned:
- Work means "force times the distance moved along the force." Opposing force ⇒ negative work.
- Mechanical energy : motion energy plus stored (height/spring) energy.
- Non-conservative = a force whose total work depends on the path length travelled, not just where you start and end. See Work–Energy theorem and Conservative forces & potential energy.
True or false — justify
Friction always does negative work on a moving object.
False. On the surface doing the sliding it is negative, but friction can do positive work on a passenger carried forward by a decelerating truck, or on the block under your hand — it's the relative-motion direction that decides the sign, not the word "friction."
A round trip on a rough floor has zero net friction work because displacement is zero.
False. Friction work uses ==total path length ==, not net displacement. A round trip has , so .
If a force does zero work on one particular closed loop, it must be conservative.
False. Conservative requires for every loop. One accidental zero (e.g. friction on a loop where you never actually move) proves nothing.
Air drag is non-conservative for the same reason friction is.
True. Drag always points opposite to velocity, so on any closed loop it subtracts on every segment — the loop integral is strictly negative, exactly like friction.
At terminal velocity a skydiver's mechanical energy stays constant.
False. Height keeps dropping so falls, while is constant — total decreases, all of it going into heating the air. See Terminal velocity & projectile with drag.
Since energy is always conserved, kinetic energy is conserved in a bullet-into-block collision.
False. Total energy is conserved, but kinetic energy is not — much becomes heat and deformation. Only momentum is conserved, so use momentum first. See Inelastic collisions.
Doubling the speed doubles the quadratic drag force.
False. Quadratic drag is , so doubling quadruples the force. Only linear (Stokes) drag doubles.
Heat generated by friction equals the loss in potential energy.
False. Heat . It accounts for the change in both KE and U, not U alone. See Heat & first law of thermodynamics.
If , a block already sliding down a rough incline will speed up.
False. The bracket , so gravity's pull along the slope loses to friction — the block decelerates (and would never start from rest).
Static friction can do work but never removes mechanical energy as heat.
True (in the ideal no-slip case). With no relative sliding, no surfaces rub, so no heat is generated; static friction can still transfer energy (e.g. a rolling wheel) without dissipating it. See Friction — static & kinetic.
Spot the error
"Block slides distance and returns; friction did forward and back, so net friction work is zero."
Error: friction does not flip sign with displacement direction — it flips to oppose velocity, so the return trip is also . Net , the loop-test signature of non-conservative.
"Terminal velocity: I set drag times distance equal to ."
Error: mixing a force with an energy statement. Terminal velocity comes from balancing forces , not from a work equation.
"On the incline example the block loses to friction."
Error: gravity releases ; friction steals only . The rest becomes KE. Confusing the released PE with the friction loss.
"I'll use for a skydiver falling through the atmosphere."
Error: is not constant during the fall — it grows as grows. Only at terminal velocity (constant ) can you use a constant-force product.
"Since friction is non-conservative, I can't use the work–energy theorem here."
Error: the work–energy theorem is always true. Non-conservative forces just mean you can't fold their work into a potential energy .
"A conservative force must always be zero around a loop, so gravity does no work when I lift a book."
Error: confusing net over a loop with over one leg. Gravity does negative work lifting up and positive coming down; the round-trip sum is zero, but a single leg is not.
Why questions
Why does friction's work depend on path but gravity's doesn't?
Gravity depends only on the height difference (endpoints), so a potential energy exists. Friction opposes motion at every step, so longer/windier paths rub more — total distance, not endpoints, sets the loss.
Why is a potential energy function impossible for friction?
A potential energy would let you assign one number to each position independent of history. But friction's work depends on how you got there (the path length), so no single position-only function can reproduce it.
Why must we use momentum, not energy, in an inelastic collision?
Kinetic energy vanishes into heat/deformation by an unknown amount, so energy bookkeeping has a missing term. Momentum has no such loss (no external impulse), giving a clean, solvable equation.
Why does drag change from linear to quadratic as speed rises?
At low speed viscous shear dominates (momentum loss ). At high speed you knock aside a mass of air per second , each parcel carrying momentum , giving .
Why is rather than ?
Non-conservative forces do negative work on the system (). The heat produced is a positive quantity equal to the energy removed, so .
Why does a block on an incline need just to start moving?
The gravity component along the slope is and maximum friction is . Motion begins only when , i.e. .
Edge cases
What is friction's work when a block sits still on a rough floor?
Zero — no sliding means no path length is traversed, so with . Static friction with no motion dissipates nothing.
What happens to the drag work at (dropped from rest)?
Drag is exactly zero at that instant ( or ), so initially the fall is pure free-fall; drag only bites once speed builds. See Terminal velocity & projectile with drag.
On an incline with exactly, what final speed does the block reach?
The bracket , so — if already moving it coasts at constant velocity (net force zero); from rest it never starts. A perfect knife-edge.
For a perfectly horizontal round trip ( constant), how does the friction loss compare to a hilly round trip of the same displacement?
The hilly trip usually has greater path length and varying , so generally more loss — the point is that displacement alone can't tell you the friction work; you need the actual traversed path.
In the limit of a frictionless, drag-free world, does the modified equation still hold?
Yes, trivially: , so — mechanical energy is conserved, recovering Mechanical energy conservation as the special case.
If drag opposed velocity but grew smaller with speed, could it still be non-conservative?
Yes — non-conservativeness comes from the force always opposing motion (loop integral negative), not from how the magnitude scales with . The direction rule alone forbids a potential energy.
Recall One-line reflex checks
Friction work uses path length not displacement ::: because it re-opposes velocity on every leg. Collision first move ::: conserve momentum, never kinetic energy. Heat produced ::: . Block starts sliding when ::: .
Connections
- Parent topic — full derivations these traps test.
- Work–Energy theorem · Mechanical energy conservation · Conservative forces & potential energy — the honest counterparts.
- Friction — static & kinetic · Terminal velocity & projectile with drag · Inelastic collisions · Heat & first law of thermodynamics — where these traps recur.