1.1.16 · D5Measurement, Vectors & Kinematics

Question bank — Equations of motion (SUVAT) — derivations from calculus

1,683 words8 min readBack to topic

The single assumption that makes everything below tick is constant acceleration. Almost every trap is really the question: did constant actually hold here?


True or false — justify

True or false: works for a car whose engine cuts out halfway.
False as one equation — acceleration changes at cut-out, so isn't constant over the whole trip. You must split into two constant- phases and apply SUVAT to each separately.
True or false: if then the object never moved.
False. is displacement; a ball thrown straight up returns to your hand with even though it travelled a large distance up and back.
True or false: a negative always means the object is slowing down.
False. Negative means acceleration points in the negative direction; whether that speeds up or slows down depends on the sign of the velocity. A ball falling downward with down chosen negative has negative but is speeding up.
True or false: can give two valid answers for .
True — solving gives . Both roots are physical if the object can be moving either way at that displacement (e.g. a ball passing a height on the way up and again on the way down).
True or false: the SUVAT equations are independent laws of physics.
False. They are just consequences of the two definitions , integrated under constant — not new physics, only calculus bookkeeping.
True or false: average velocity equals for any motion.
False. That midpoint rule holds only when rises linearly, i.e. constant . For varying the velocity–time graph curves and the average is the true integral, not the endpoint midpoint.
True or false: because the equations "leave out one variable", the left-out variable is irrelevant to the motion.
False. The omitted variable is simply the one not appearing in that particular relation; it still exists and can be recovered from another equation. "Missing " means you can solve without knowing , not that time stopped mattering.
True or false: needs you to know the acceleration.
False — that's the whole point. It omits , so you can find displacement from the two velocities and time even when the acceleration value is unknown (as long as it was constant).

Spot the error

"A stone is dropped, so , and after 2 s it has fallen upward."
The formula is fine but the direction is wrong: if down is positive then is a downward (positive) fall. "Upward" contradicts the chosen sign convention. Always fix a positive direction before reading off signs.
"For a ball thrown up at , at the top so acceleration is also there."
Error: at the peak velocity is momentarily zero but acceleration is still downward the entire time. is the rate of change of , and is changing fastest through zero, so .
"Braking from I used and got a negative stopping distance, that's fine."
Error: braking opposes the motion, so with motion positive the acceleration must be . Using describes speeding up, which is why the algebra gave a nonsensical negative .
"Air resistance is small, so I'll use SUVAT with the object's average acceleration."
Error: SUVAT requires constant , not an average value. Using a mean acceleration in silently assumes the linear- profile, which air resistance violates — the answer is only a rough estimate, not exact. See Free fall and g for when the approximation is safe; the figure there shows how the real curve bends away from the straight SUVAT line.
"To find where a projectile lands I plug the full velocity into the horizontal SUVAT equation."
Error: SUVAT applies per-axis (Vectors). Horizontally so you use only the horizontal velocity component; the vertical component belongs to a separate equation with . See Projectile motion, where the velocity arrow is split into its two component sketches.
"An object in SHM oscillates smoothly, so I'll use over one swing."
Error: in Simple Harmonic Motion acceleration is , which changes with position. Constant- formulas don't apply; you must integrate the actual — its graph is a sine wave, not a straight line.

Why questions

Why does the chain-rule form let us derive a "timeless" equation?
Because it rewrites acceleration as a derivative with respect to position instead of time, so integrating over never introduces — time is eliminated by construction.
Why must be constant for the integrals to give simple polynomials?
If is constant it factors out of , giving ; if it stays inside and the integral becomes whatever antiderivative has — generally not a neat SUVAT term.
Why is the term in separate from ?
is the displacement you'd get travelling at the fixed initial speed ; is the extra displacement the acceleration piles on. Splitting them shows constant-speed motion plus an acceleration correction.
Why can we integrate from limits and rather than adding a constant of integration?
The limits encode the initial condition ( at ) directly, so the constant is already baked in — definite integration and "constant + solve for C" give the same result. See Differentiation and Integration.
Why does the area under a graph equal displacement?
Because , so summing tiny strips of height and width (their areas) accumulates total displacement — that sum is the integral . See Velocity-time graphs and the shaded strip in the figure below.
Why is the displacement a trapezium area for constant ?
The line goes straight from height to height , enclosing a trapezium of parallel sides and width , whose area is exactly . The figure shows this trapezium shaded.
Figure — Equations of motion (SUVAT) — derivations from calculus

Edge cases

Edge case: . Which SUVAT equations survive and what do they say?
With : (constant velocity), , and . Motion reduces to steady speed — this is the horizontal axis of a projectile.
Edge case: . What do the equations predict?
All give the starting state: , , and trivially. A sanity check that means "no motion yet".
Edge case: (start from rest). How do the equations simplify?
, , , and . This is the classic dropped-stone / free-fall setup in Free fall and g.
Edge case: object launched up, at the exact top of its flight. Which quantities are zero and which are not?
Velocity at the peak, but acceleration is unchanged and displacement is at its maximum (non-zero). Only vanishes; the "instant of rest" is not an instant of no acceleration.
Edge case: a ball thrown up and caught at the same height. What is , and does still hold?
Displacement , so , giving : same speed, opposite direction on return. The equation cleanly predicts the symmetric landing speed.
Edge case: solving for gives two positive roots. What does that mean physically?
The object passes that displacement twice — e.g. a ball reaches a height once going up and again coming down. Both times are real events; choose the one matching the phase you care about.
Edge case: gives a negative number under the square root. Interpretation?
It means the object never reaches that displacement — e.g. a ball can't rise higher than its energy allows, so signals "this position is unreachable" rather than a computational slip.

Recall One-sentence survival rule

Before writing any SUVAT equation, ask: is the acceleration constant over the whole interval, and have I fixed a positive direction? If either answer is no ::: split the motion into constant- chunks and/or re-read every sign against your chosen positive axis before trusting the numbers.