3.5.4 · D4Complex Numbers

Exercises — Modulus - z - and argument arg(z)

3,078 words14 min readBack to topic

Here is the whole tour of the plane we will be walking through — every worked point lands somewhere on this map:

Figure — Modulus  - z -  and argument arg(z)

Level 1 — Recognition

You should be able to read off modulus and argument for the "nice" points without a calculator.

Recall Solution — L1·Q1

WHAT we do: identify the real part and imaginary part, then apply Pythagoras.

  • (horizontal offset), (vertical offset).

WHY ? The arrow to is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs and ; its length is Pythagoras. Answer: .

Recall Solution — L1·Q2

Each point sits on an axis, so no triangle is needed — just point in the right direction.

  • : on the positive real axis.
  • : on the negative real axis (not ; the range includes but excludes ).
  • : on the positive imaginary axis ⇒ straight up ⇒ .
  • : straight down ⇒ .
Recall Solution — L1·Q3

Read the two signs ; that alone fixes the quadrant, and quadrant fixes the sign of the angle.

  • : QI, positive.
  • : QII, positive.
  • : QIII, negative.
  • : QIV, negative.

Level 2 — Application

Now compute both length and angle for genuine (non-axis) points, using the reference angle.

The picture below shows exactly how the same reference angle gets "placed" differently in each quadrant:

Recall Solution — L2·Q1

Modulus: Reference angle: Quadrant: QII WHY the shift? In QII the arrow leans up-and-left, so measured anticlockwise from the positive real axis it is obtuse — bigger than . Subtracting from gives that obtuse angle.

Recall Solution — L2·Q2

Modulus: Reference angle: Quadrant: QIII WHY negative? The arrow points down-and-left. Going anticlockwise from the positive real axis you'd travel more than , which leaves the range ; the shorter, clockwise route is negative, landing at .

Recall Solution — L2·Q3

Modulus: Reference angle: Quadrant: QIV Polar form: Check: ✓ and ✓.


Level 3 — Analysis

Here you must combine facts: use modulus algebra, or the argument-adds rule, rather than a single lookup.

Recall Solution — L3·Q1

WHY not multiply? Because modulus is multiplicative: (proved in the parent note via ). So we only need two easy Pythagoras sums.

  • (Sanity check: , and ✓.)
Recall Solution — L3·Q2

WHY add? Because (angles add under multiplication — the "rotate" half of scale-and-rotate).

  • : QI,
  • : QII, (from L2·Q1).
  • Sum:

Is in ? Yes (), so no wrap-around needed.

Recall Solution — L3·Q3
  • : QIII,
  • Sum of arguments: Answer: WHAT it means geometrically: (conjugate; see Conjugate of a complex number). Multiplying a number by its conjugate gives , a positive real number — which sits on the positive real axis, argument . Directions cancelled exactly. ✓

Level 4 — Synthesis

Now build multi-step arguments: powers, quotients, and geometry, weaving several rules together.

Recall Solution — L4·Q1

WHY polar? Because a power multiplies the number by itself repeatedly, and under multiplication moduli multiply, arguments add. Raising to the -th power therefore raises the modulus to the -th and multiplies the argument by — this is De Moivre's Theorem:

  • : (QI).
  • Answer: (A real number — the eight quarter-turns of add up to two full turns, landing back on the positive real axis.)
Recall Solution — L4·Q2

WHY these rules? Division is the inverse of multiplication, so moduli divide and arguments subtract:

  • ⇒ difference , so
Recall Solution — L4·Q3

WHAT the two conditions mean: pins the distance (a circle of radius ); pins the direction (a ray from the origin at ). Their intersection is a single point. Using :

  • Answer: (Check: ✓, QI with ✓.)

Level 5 — Mastery

Full open-ended reasoning: prove, generalise, handle degenerate cases.

Recall Solution — L5·Q1

WHY polar? A cube root satisfies ; taking moduli and arguments turns this into two scalar equations, one for length and one for angle. Step 1 — put in polar.

  • is in QII (). Reference angle , so
  • So for integers .

Step 2 — take cube roots (De Moivre). A root needs:

Step 3 — list the three angles (and drag each into ):

  • QI.
  • QII ✓.
  • ; subtract : QIV.

Step 4 — the QII root. It is , with modulus and argument . Cartesian form: (Check the direction: — genuinely QII, exactly as asked.) Take-away: the three roots sit on a circle of radius , spaced apart — one per quadrant band, landing in QI, QII, and QIV here.

Recall Solution — L5·Q2

WHY use ? Because turns "length squared" into ordinary multiplication, and multiplication is easy to expand. Use . Add: the cross terms cancel, leaving WHAT IT MEANS: in the parallelogram spanned by and , the sum of the squares of the two diagonals equals the sum of the squares of all four sides. A geometry theorem, proven by algebra.

Recall Solution — L5·Q3

(i) : . But is undefined — a zero-length arrow points nowhere, so "direction" has no meaning. This is the one genuinely degenerate input in the whole theory: modulus exists (it is ), argument does not. (ii) : ; on the negative real axis so (the range endpoint, not ). (iii) The number is already in polar form with and stated angle . But , so it is not a principal argument. Bring it into range by subtracting : So and (the arrow points down-and-left, QIII). ✓


Recall Wrap-up: what these five levels add up to
  • L1 (Recognition): read the plane — modulus is a straight-line distance, argument is a direction, axis points are memorised.
  • L2 (Application): reference angle then quadrant is the universal recipe; it never fails, and never needs a raw .
  • L3 (Analysis): modulus is multiplicative and argument is additive — but arguments only add mod , so always land back in .
  • L4 (Synthesis): powers and quotients are the same two rules pushed harder (De Moivre for powers, subtract-and-divide for quotients); a modulus + argument pair pins a unique point.
  • L5 (Mastery): roots spread evenly around a circle; identities like the parallelogram law fall out of ; and the sole degenerate case is , where the modulus is but the argument simply does not exist.

If you can reproduce every solution above with the collapsibles closed, you own this topic.