Before the traps, build the two mental images every question below leans on. Don't skip these — they replace the phrase "click the link to the parent page."
Watch what the reciprocal y=1/u does as the denominator u shrinks toward 0. Feed in u=0.5,0.1,0.01,0.001; the reciprocals are 2,10,100,1000. The smaller the bottom, the taller the output — and there is no ceiling. The curve races to +∞ from the positive side and to −∞ from the negative side, so at u=0 the graph has no single value: it splits into a vertical wall.
Take positive inputs that are rising: u=1,2,3,4. Their reciprocals are 1,21,31,41 — a falling list. As the input climbs, its upside-down twin sinks. That is the whole reason cotx (the reciprocal-flavoured cousin of tanx) decreases on each branch even though tanx increases.
False.cscx=1/sinx; a fraction with numerator 1 is never zero no matter how large the denominator grows, so cscx has no zeros at all.
secx and cscx have the exact same range.
True. Both are reciprocals of something bounded by [−1,1], so both give (−∞,−1]∪[1,∞) — the open band (−1,1) is forbidden for both. See Domain and Range.
cotx and cscx have the same vertical asymptotes.
True. Both die where sinx=0, i.e. x=nπ, because sinx is the denominator of both. Only secx is different (dies where cosx=0).
The value y=0.5 appears somewhere on the graph of secx.
False.0.5 lies inside the forbidden band (−1,1); since ∣cosx∣≤1, its reciprocal has magnitude ≥1, so secx can never take a value between −1 and 1.
cotx increases across each of its branches, just like tanx.
False. Reciprocating flips the trend (Picture 2): cotx decreases from +∞ to −∞ on every interval (nπ,(n+1)π). See Odd and Even Functions.
secx is an even function.
True.sec(−x)=1/cos(−x)=1/cosx=secx, because cos is even. Its graph is symmetric about the y-axis.
cscx is an even function like secx.
False.csc(−x)=1/sin(−x)=−1/sinx=−cscx, so csc is odd (symmetric through the origin), not even. Only sec is even.
The period of cotx is 2π, the same as cscx.
False.cotx repeats every π because its asymptotes at x=nπ are spaced π apart, so its period is ==π==, half that of cscx.
At every point where sinx=1, the graph of cscx has a minimum.
True.1/1=1, and just left/right of the peak sinx<1 so cscx>1 — the branch turns upward, giving a minimum of the upper branch at y=1.
secx touches the line y=−1 at x=0.
False. At x=0, cos0=1 so sec0=+1; secx touches −1 where cosx=−1, i.e. x=π,3π,….
"cscx=0 when sinx=0, so both cross the x-axis at x=nπ."
Error: at x=nπ the denominator sinx is 0, so cscx is undefined there — that is exactly where it builds a vertical asymptote (Picture 1), the opposite of crossing the axis.
"secx blows up at x=nπ because that's where cosx=0."
Error:cos(nπ)=±1=0. secx blows up where cosx=0, which is x=2π+nπ — the odd multiples of 2π, not the multiples of π.
"Since cotx=1/tanx, and tanx increases, cotx must increase too."
Error: reciprocating reverses the direction of motion (Picture 2); as tanx climbs, 1/tanx falls. So cotxdecreases on each branch.
"Solving cscx=0.7: I read where the curve meets y=0.7."
Error:0.7∈(−1,1) is inside the forbidden band, so the csc curve never reaches y=0.7 — the equation has no solution. See Solving Trigonometric Equations.
"cotx is undefined where cosx=0, since cosx is in it."
Error: it's the denominatorsinx that must be nonzero. Where cosx=0 the numerator vanishes, giving cotx=0 — a zero, not an asymptote.
"sec(2π)=1/cos(2π)=1/0, so I'll write sec(2π)=∞."
Error: you cannot assign a single value ∞; secx has no value at x=2π. It tends to +∞ from one side and −∞ from the other — the function is simply undefined there.
"The graph of cscx shifted left by 2π gives cotx."
Error: shifting cscx left by 2π gives secx (because cosx=sin(x+2π)). cotx is a different graph entirely — its range is all reals, unlike sec/csc.
Why does cscx have a "forbidden band" (−1,1) but cotx does not?
Because ∣sinx∣≤1, its reciprocal has magnitude ≥1, banning values inside (−1,1). But cotx=cosx/sinx is a ratio of two varying quantities, so it can take every real value, including those inside (−1,1).
Why are the asymptotes of cscx at x=nπ rather than at x=2π+nπ?
Because a wall appears where the denominator sinx is 0, and sinx=0 exactly at x=nπ. The points 2π+nπ are where sinx=±1 — there cscx merely touches ±1.
Why does cscx touch y=1 but never go below it on the upper branch?
At sinx=1 we get cscx=1; everywhere else on that branch 0<sinx<1, so cscx>1. Thus y=1 is the lowest reachable value there — a floor it kisses but never crosses.
Why does cotx run from +∞ down to −∞ inside (0,π) rather than the reverse?
Just right of 0, sinx→0+ and cosx→1, so cotx→+∞. Just left of π, sinx→0+ but cosx→−1, so cotx→−∞. Hence it slides downward across the whole interval.
Why is secx even while cotx is odd?
secx is built from cos, an even function, so it inherits even symmetry. cotx=cosx/sinx mixes even cos with odd sin; even divided by odd is odd, giving cot(−x)=−cotx.
Why can we build all three graphs "for free" from sin, cos, tan?
Because each is literally a reciprocal, and the reciprocal rule y=1/u deterministically maps zeros of u to walls, ±1-points of u to touches, and preserves the sign — so no independent memorising is needed. See Graphs of sin x, cos x, tan x.
Why does the identity 1+cot2x=csc2x guarantee csc2x≥1?
Since cot2x≥0 always, adding 1 gives csc2x≥1, hence ∣cscx∣≥1 — an algebraic proof of the forbidden band. See Trigonometric Identities.
Undefined.sin0=0, so csc0=1/0 has no value — x=0 is a vertical asymptote, not a point on the graph.
Does secx have a value at x=23π?
No.cos(23π)=0, so sec is undefined there and has an asymptote; approaching it, secx→+∞ on one side and −∞ on the other.
Can cotx and cscx ever both be defined at the same x=nπ?
No. Both share the denominator sinx, which is 0 at x=nπ; whenever one is undefined there, so is the other — they share the same walls.
As x→0−, what does cscx approach?
sinx→0− (small negative), so cscx=1/sinx→−∞. Approaching from the other side (0+) it instead flies to +∞.
What is the largest value sinx can take, and what does cscx equal there?
sinx reaches a maximum of 1; there cscx=1/1=1, the smallest positive value cscx ever attains.
Is there any x where cscx, secx, and cotx are all defined and equal?
Being equal would need sinx=cosxandcosx/sinx to match; sinx=cosx gives cscx=secx=2, but there cotx=1=2, so no common value exists.
At an asymptote, is the function value +∞?
No.+∞ is not a real number and not a "value"; the function is simply undefined at the asymptote, with the graph shooting toward ±∞ near it. See Vertical Asymptotes and Limits.
In which single quadrant are csc, sec and cot all positive together?
Quadrant I only (0,2π): there sin>0 and cos>0, so all three reciprocals inherit the positive sign.