This page is the drill hall for radian measure . The parent note built the definition θ = s / r and the master key 18 0 ∘ = π rad. Here we throw every kind of question at you and work each one to the bone. Nothing new is assumed — if a symbol appears, it was earned in the parent note or is rebuilt below.
Intuition What "every scenario" means
Conversion problems look simple, but they hide traps: which direction do I convert? What if the angle is negative, or bigger than a full turn, or exactly zero? What about a word problem where I must choose to convert first? We list all these case classes in one table, then hit each one with a worked example so you never meet an unseen case in an exam.
Every question this topic can throw belongs to one of these cells. Each row is covered by at least one worked example below.
Cell
Case class
What makes it tricky
Example
A
Degrees → radians, "nice" angle
pick the shrinking factor 180 π
Ex 1
B
Radians → degrees, π -form
the π must cancel
Ex 2
C
Radians → degrees, decimal (no π )
use 1 rad ≈ 57. 3 ∘
Ex 3
D
Negative angle
sign rides along untouched
Ex 4
E
Bigger than a full turn (> 36 0 ∘ or > 2 π )
co-terminal reduction
Ex 5
F
Zero / degenerate input
arc collapses, formula still holds
Ex 6
G
Real-world word problem (arc length)
must convert before s = r θ
Ex 7
H
Real-world word problem (angular speed)
rad/s vs deg/s, Circular Motion
Ex 8
I
Exam twist : solve backwards for r or θ
rearrange the definition
Ex 9
J
Limiting behaviour (θ → 0 )
link to Small Angle Approximation
Ex 10
Mnemonic The one rule that survives every cell
Put the unit you WANT on top. Want radians → × 180 π (number shrinks). Want degrees → × π 180 (number grows). Sign, size, and everything else just come along for the ride.
Worked example Ex 1. Convert
22 5 ∘ to radians
Forecast: 22 5 ∘ is more than 18 0 ∘ but less than 36 0 ∘ , so your answer should be between π and 2 π (between about 3.14 and 6.28). Guess a number before reading on.
Step 1 — multiply by 180 π .
Why this step? We want radians on top, and going deg→rad the number must shrink, so the factor < 1 .
225 × 180 π = 180 225 π
Step 2 — simplify the fraction.
Why this step? g cd( 225 , 180 ) = 45 , so divide top and bottom by 45 .
180 225 π = 4 5 π rad
Verify: 4 5 π ≈ 3.93 , which sits neatly between π ≈ 3.14 and 2 π ≈ 6.28 — matches the forecast. ✓
Worked example Ex 2. Convert
6 7 π rad to degrees
Forecast: 6 7 π is a bit more than π (which is 18 0 ∘ ), so expect just over 18 0 ∘ .
Step 1 — multiply by π 180 .
Why this step? We want degrees on top; rad→deg the number should grow.
6 7 π × π 180
Step 2 — cancel the π .
Why this step? π upstairs meets π downstairs — this cancellation is the sign you chose the right factor.
6 7 × 180 = 7 × 30 = 21 0 ∘
Verify: 21 0 ∘ is 3 0 ∘ past 18 0 ∘ — just over half a turn, exactly as forecast. ✓
Worked example Ex 3. Convert
2.5 rad to degrees
Forecast: one radian ≈ 57. 3 ∘ , so 2.5 of them should be around 2.5 × 57 ≈ 14 3 ∘ — more than 9 0 ∘ , less than 18 0 ∘ .
Step 1 — multiply by π 180 .
Why this step? No π hides in "2.5 ", so nothing cancels; we just compute the decimal value of the factor.
2.5 × π 180 = π 450
Step 2 — evaluate numerically.
Why this step? The answer isn't a familiar π -fraction, so a decimal is the honest form.
π 450 ≈ 143.2 4 ∘
Verify: 143.24 × 180 π ≈ 2.5 rad — converting back returns the start, so it's consistent. ✓
Worked example Ex 4. Convert
− 12 0 ∘ to radians
Forecast: The magnitude 12 0 ∘ is two-thirds of 18 0 ∘ , so its radian size is about 3 2 π ≈ 2.09 . The minus sign just flips the direction of rotation (clockwise ), so expect ≈ − 2.09 .
Step 1 — handle the magnitude, carry the sign.
Why this step? Conversion is a multiplication by a positive factor; multiplying a negative number keeps it negative. The sign is not "lost" or "fixed" — it rides along.
− 120 × 180 π = − 180 120 π
Step 2 — simplify.
Why this step? g cd( 120 , 180 ) = 60 .
− 180 120 π = − 3 2 π rad
Verify: − 3 2 π ≈ − 2.09 rad, matching the forecast, and − 3 2 π × π 180 = − 12 0 ∘ returns the start. ✓
Worked example Ex 5. Convert
78 0 ∘ to radians, then give the co-terminal angle in [ 0 , 2 π )
Forecast: 78 0 ∘ is more than a full turn (36 0 ∘ ). 780 − 360 = 420 , still over 360 ; 420 − 360 = 60 . So it points the same way as 6 0 ∘ , i.e. 3 π .
Step 1 — convert the raw angle.
Why this step? The conversion factor doesn't care how big the angle is.
780 × 180 π = 180 780 π = 3 13 π rad
Step 2 — reduce modulo 2 π .
Why this step? Adding or removing whole turns (2 π ) lands on the same ray, so subtract 2 π = 3 6 π until we sit in [ 0 , 2 π ) .
3 13 π − 3 6 π = 3 7 π , 3 7 π − 3 6 π = 3 π
Verify: 3 π = 6 0 ∘ , and 78 0 ∘ − 2 × 36 0 ∘ = 6 0 ∘ — the same direction, confirmed on the Unit Circle . ✓
Worked example Ex 6. Convert
0 ∘ ; and find the arc length of a 0 -radian sector on a radius-8 circle
Forecast: No angle swept means no arc — the answer should be 0 in both units and s = 0 . But why does the formula not break?
Step 1 — convert 0 ∘ .
Why this step? Test the factor on the smallest input.
0 × 180 π = 0 rad
Step 2 — apply s = r θ with θ = 0 .
Why this step? Zero is not a special case to avoid — the definition θ = s / r with s = 0 gives θ = 0 , and rearranged, s = r ⋅ 0 = 0 .
s = 8 × 0 = 0 cm
Verify: A degenerate sector is just a line segment (radius overlapping itself), zero arc — geometry and formula agree, no division blow-up because r = 8 = 0 . ✓
Worked example Ex 7. A wheel of radius
30 cm turns through 7 2 ∘ . How far does a rim point travel?
Forecast: 7 2 ∘ is one-fifth of 36 0 ∘ , so the rim travels one-fifth of the circumference 2 π × 30 = 60 π ≈ 188 cm. One-fifth of that is about 38 cm.
Step 1 — convert to radians.
Why this step? $s=r\theta$ demands radians — it's the rearranged definition of the radian, so degrees would give a wrong number.
θ = 72 × 180 π = 5 2 π rad
Step 2 — apply s = r θ .
Why this step? Distance travelled along the rim is the arc length.
s = 30 × 5 2 π = 12 π ≈ 37.70 cm
Verify: 12 π is exactly one-fifth of 60 π (the full circumference), matching the forecast. Units: cm × (dimensionless rad) = cm. ✓
Worked example Ex 8. A record spins at
45 revolutions per minute (rpm). Find its angular speed in rad/s.
Forecast: 45 rev/min is under one rev/second (45/60 = 0.75 rev/s). Each rev is 2 π ≈ 6.28 rad, so expect about 0.75 × 6.28 ≈ 4.7 rad/s.
Step 1 — revolutions → radians.
Why this step? One revolution sweeps the whole circle, 2 π rad — that's the natural angular unit.
45 rev = 45 × 2 π = 90 π rad
Step 2 — per minute → per second.
Why this step? 1 minute = 60 s, so divide by 60 to change the time unit.
ω = 60 s 90 π rad = 2 3 π rad/s ≈ 4.712 rad/s
Verify: 2 3 π ≈ 4.71 rad/s, matching the forecast ≈ 4.7 . ✓
Worked example Ex 9. An arc of length
14 cm subtends 1.75 rad at the centre. Find the radius.
Forecast: 1.75 rad is a bit under two radius-lengths of arc; since the arc is 14 cm, one radius-length is roughly 14/1.75 = 8 cm.
Step 1 — start from the definition, not a memorised formula.
Why this step? The angle is given in radians already , so θ = s / r applies directly — no conversion needed.
1.75 = r 14
Step 2 — rearrange for r .
Why this step? We isolate the unknown by multiplying both sides by r and dividing by 1.75 .
r = 1.75 14 = 8 cm
Verify: s = r θ = 8 × 1.75 = 14 cm — plugging back returns the given arc. ✓
Worked example Ex 10. For a tiny angle, compare the arc
s and the straight chord across it on a radius-1 circle. Use θ = 0.02 rad.
Forecast: For a very small angle the curved arc and the straight chord are almost indistinguishable, so s ≈ sin θ — the whole point of the Small Angle Approximation . Expect the two numbers to agree to several decimals.
Step 1 — arc length on the unit circle .
Why this step? With r = 1 , s = r θ = θ exactly — radians make the arc equal the angle. This is only true in radians.
s = 1 × 0.02 = 0.02
Step 2 — compare with sin θ (the vertical rise, a stand-in for the chord's half-height).
Why this step? As θ → 0 , sin θ → θ ; this equality is what makes $\tfrac{d}{d\theta}\sin\theta = \cos\theta$ clean.
sin ( 0.02 ) ≈ 0.0199987
Verify: s = 0.02 vs sin θ ≈ 0.0199987 — they agree to 4 decimal places. As θ → 0 the ratio θ s i n θ → 1 , so arc ≈ chord. This limit requires radians. ✓
Recall Which factor, which direction? (self-test)
Convert 15 0 ∘ to radians ::: 150 × 180 π = 6 5 π rad.
Convert 6 11 π rad to degrees ::: 6 11 π × π 180 = 33 0 ∘ .
78 0 ∘ points the same way as which angle in [ 0 , 36 0 ∘ ) ? ::: 6 0 ∘ (subtract 36 0 ∘ twice).
Arc of 1.75 rad, length 14 cm — radius? ::: r = 14/1.75 = 8 cm.
Why must you convert before using s = r θ ? ::: Because s = r θ is the rearranged radian definition; it only holds in radians.
Common mistake The single most common slip across all cells
Reaching for s = r θ (Ex 7) or ω (Ex 8) while the angle is still in degrees . Fix: every formula that came from θ = s / r — arc length, sector area, angular speed, small-angle — needs radians first . Convert, then compute.
s equals r theta needs radians