Exercises — Photonic and optical interconnects
Level 1 — Recognition
(Can you name the piece and read the picture?)
L1.1 — Name the four blocks
An optical link is drawn below as a chain. Fill in the four missing block names in order, and say for each whether it turns electrons → photons, photons → photons, or photons → electrons.

Recall Solution
Reading the chain left to right:
- Laser source — makes the blank optical carrier. (Supplies photons; electrical power in, steady light out.)
- Modulator — electrons → photons (imprints the bit pattern onto the light).
- Waveguide / fiber — photons → photons (just carries the light).
- Photodetector — photons → electrons (recovers a current).
This is the E-O-E (Electrical–Optical–Electrical) link. The two conversions (modulator, detector) are where the energy is spent; the middle (the waveguide) is nearly free.
L1.2 — Which metric wins?
True or false: "The main advantage of photonic interconnects over copper is much lower latency (raw travel time)."
Recall Solution
False. Light in silicon travels at with , so it is actually slower per metre than a fast electrical signal on a good copper trace. The real advantages are bandwidth density (many colours in one waveguide via WDM) and energy per bit (roughly distance-independent). Latency only improves indirectly, by removing serial repeaters/retimers.
Level 2 — Application
(Plug into the derived formulas: , , .)
L2.1 — RC delay scaling
A copper wire of length has delay . If you make the wire 3 times longer, by what factor does the delay grow?
Recall Solution
. Replace : Factor = 9. This is the " wall": tripling length gives nine times the delay. A photonic transit (, linear in ) would only triple.
L2.2 — WDM aggregate bandwidth
A single waveguide carries wavelength channels, each running at . What is the aggregate bandwidth ?
Recall Solution
Independent colours add linearly (they don't steal each other's capacity):
L2.3 — Energy per bit
A photonic link burns of total electrical power to move . Find in picojoules per bit.
Recall Solution
The seconds cancel (Watts = J/s, bit rate = bit/s), leaving J/bit. is in the realistic near-sub-pJ range for co-packaged optics.
Level 3 — Analysis
(Compare, and explain the geometry / physics behind the numbers.)
L3.1 — Copper lane vs WDM fiber
A copper serial lane does (one stream). A fiber runs WDM with colours at each. By what factor does the fiber beat the copper lane in throughput on one physical line?
Recall Solution
Fiber: . Ratio: The fiber wins by on a single line — and the extra 39 channels add no crosstalk, because different colours don't interfere. That bandwidth-density advantage, not latency, is the whole selling point.
L3.2 — Mach–Zehnder output level
A Mach–Zehnder modulator (see Mach-Zehnder Modulator) has output power . Look at the transfer curve below. Compute for and say which encodes a logic 0.

Recall Solution
Plug each phase into :
- : → full power → logic 1.
- : → half power (the mid-point of the curve).
- : → zero power → logic 0.
So the electrical drive must swing the phase from to to flip a bit. On the figure, the red dot at sits on the curve's floor — that is destructive interference: the two arms arrive exactly out of step and cancel.
L3.3 — Why does the detector need a TIA?
A photodiode of responsivity receives of optical power. What current does it output? Why can't this drive digital logic directly, and what fixes it?
Recall Solution
A photodiode outputs a current, not a voltage, and into a chip's tiny input impedance is a minuscule signal. You need a Transimpedance Amplifier (TIA) to convert that current into a usable voltage swing. That TIA is a real slice of the link's energy budget — the receiver is not "free."
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Combine multiple derived results into one design answer.)
L4.1 — Meet a bandwidth and energy target together
You must design one waveguide link delivering at least . Each colour runs at . Each colour's transmit+receive chain (laser share + modulator + TIA) burns . (a) Minimum number of colours ? (b) Total power ? (c) Energy per bit ?
Recall Solution
(a) Need : So colours (exactly hits ).
(b) Each colour costs :
(c) Notice: because per-channel power and per-channel bandwidth both scale with , the energy per bit is independent of here — it's set entirely by the per-channel efficiency . That is why photonics engineers obsess over per-channel numbers, not aggregate ones.
L4.2 — Which link at long distance?
For a chip-to-chip run, a copper lane's energy per bit rises with distance (needs equalisers/repeaters), landing near ; the photonic link stays near regardless of the . How many times more energy-efficient is photonics here, and why is its number distance-flat?
Recall Solution
Photonics is distance-flat because once light is launched into a low-loss waveguide, carrying it another metre costs almost nothing (see Energy per bit as an efficiency metric). The cost lives in the conversions at each end (modulator + TIA), which don't grow with length. Copper, by contrast, pays losses and needs active repeaters that scale with distance.
Level 5 — Mastery
(Reason across the whole system, including the awkward cases.)
L5.1 — When does copper actually win?
For very short wires (a few hundred µm inside a core), does the copper wall even matter? Argue with the two scaling laws, and state where copper still beats photonics.
Recall Solution
Copper delay ; photonic transit plus fixed conversion overhead (modulator + detector + TIA latency).
- At tiny , is negligible, so is minuscule — and it beats photonics because (a fixed cost) dominates the light path. Converting to light and back is simply not worth it for a hop.
- Copper only loses once is long enough that (and the repeaters it forces) exceeds the photonic overhead. That crossover is why photonics targets chip-to-chip, co-packaged, and rack-scale links first, and on-chip NoC links only later.
Conclusion: photonics is not universally better — it wins in the bandwidth × distance regime where copper's delay and per-channel serial limit bite hardest.
L5.2 — Degenerate WDM:
What does give when ? Interpret this limiting case physically, and connect it to why a bare fiber isn't automatically better than copper.
Recall Solution
With a single colour, the WDM advantage vanishes — the fiber carries exactly one stream at rate , no parallelism. In this degenerate case a single copper lane at comparable may match it, and copper avoids the laser/modulator/TIA overhead. The photonic win is earned only when : parallelism in wavelength is the lever. A fiber with one colour is just a slow, expensive wire.
L5.3 — Why not grow the laser in silicon?
A designer proposes fabricating the laser directly in the silicon CMOS die to save a bonding step. Explain the physics that stops this, and what the industry does instead (see Silicon Photonics).
Recall Solution
Silicon has an indirect bandgap: an electron dropping across the gap must also swap momentum with a lattice vibration, which makes radiative (light-emitting) recombination extremely inefficient. Silicon is a fine light guide and detector, but a terrible emitter. So lasers are built from III–V materials (InP, GaAs) that have direct bandgaps, then bonded or co-packaged onto the silicon photonic die. The waveguides, modulators (rings / MZMs), and detectors can be silicon; the light source generally cannot.
Recall One-line summary to hide and recall
Copper delay (quadratic); photonic transit (linear) WDM aggregate Energy per bit , set by per-channel efficiency, -independent MZM output , with logic 0 Photodiode current , then a TIA makes it a voltage