Visual walkthrough — Analyze simple AC circuits with reactance
Step 1 — WHAT is a wiggling voltage, in a picture?
Let us earn each symbol on the graph before we ever compute with it.

- — the height of the curve at time . It is "how hard the source pushes" at this instant.
- — the peak value, the tallest the curve ever reaches (the pale-yellow dashed line). "" for maximum.
- (Greek "omega") — how fast we wiggle, in radians per second. Bigger ⇒ the curve is squeezed left–right ⇒ faster oscillation. It links to everyday frequency by (one full cycle is radians).
- — the shape that starts at the top ( when ) and swings down, an honest smooth back-and-forth.
WHY cosine and not a straight line? Because the whole point of AC is that the push changes direction rhythmically. A capacitor and an inductor only "wake up" when things change — so we must feed them a changing signal, and cosine is the cleanest changing signal there is.
Step 2 — WHAT the inductor law says, drawn as slope

Read the law term by term, on the picture:
- — the current, the flow of charge through the coil (chalk-blue curve).
- — the steepness of that current curve: how fast the current is changing right now. On the figure it is the slope of the little tangent line. Steep ⇒ big; flat ⇒ zero.
- — inductance, a fixed property of the coil (how stubborn it is). Units: henries.
- — the voltage the coil throws back. The law says it is just the slope scaled by .
WHY a derivative here? Because an inductor doesn't care how much current flows — it cares how fast it changes. That "rate of change" idea is exactly what a derivative measures, so is the correct tool, not itself.
Step 3 — WHAT current the inductor lets through (undo the derivative)
We know (that's our source). We want . The law gives from ; to go the other way we must undo the derivative — that operation is integration.
Term by term:
- — "add up the pushes over time." It is the inverse of , exactly the undo we needed.
- — integrating cosine gives sine, and out pops a factor . This is where the frequency-dependence is born.
- — carried along from dividing the law by .
- Result peak current .

WHY does this prove inductors block high frequency? Look at : the sits downstairs. Crank up and shrinks — faster wiggling squeezes the current down. On the figure, notice the blue current is a sine: it peaks a quarter-cycle after the cosine voltage. The current lags.
Step 4 — WHAT "reactance" is: Ohm's law in disguise
Compare with the DC statement . They have the exact same shape. Whatever sits where used to sit is the AC opposition.

- — inductive reactance, opposition in ohms . It stores energy, never burns it.
- — grows straight up with frequency (a rising line on the plot).
The capacitor is the mirror image. Its law needs a derivative (differentiate the voltage), giving so . Now is downstairs — a falling curve (the "CLiFF"). See both drawn together above: pale-yellow rising , pink falling . Here the current is -shaped and peaks before the voltage — the current leads. See Capacitors and Inductors for the component physics.
Step 5 — WHY and live on perpendicular axes
Here is the deepest picture. A resistor's current is in step with its voltage (peaks together). A reactor's current is a quarter-cycle () shifted. Two things separated by a quarter-cycle are, in the rotating-arrow language of Complex Numbers and Phasors, at right angles.

- Horizontal axis (real, chalk-white): everything in phase with the voltage — that's .
- Vertical axis (imaginary, marked with ): everything out of phase — that's reactance.
- — the symbol engineers use for ; geometrically it means "rotate a quarter-turn." Multiply by ⇒ swing counter-clockwise.
So an inductor's impedance points up: . A capacitor's points down: .
WHY does this matter? Because you cannot add a horizontal arrow to a vertical arrow by simple arithmetic — you must add them as arrows, tip to tail. That is the seed of Pythagoras in the next step.
Step 6 — WHAT the impedance triangle looks like (the payoff)
Put a resistor, an inductor and a capacitor in series (same current through all). Their impedance arrows add tip-to-tail: points right, points up, points down. The two vertical arrows partly cancel, leaving a net vertical piece .

Now a right triangle appears with its own name for every side:
- Horizontal leg — the resistive, energy-burning part.
- Vertical leg — the net reactive part (up if inductive wins, down if capacitive wins).
- Hypotenuse — the total opposition, found by Pythagoras because the legs are perpendicular:
- Angle between and the hypotenuse — the phase shift. It is "which angle has this ratio of opposite over adjacent?", i.e.
WHY ? On this triangle . We know the two legs and want the angle, so we ask the inverse question "what angle gives this tangent?" — that is .
Step 7 — ALL the cases (never leave the reader stranded)
The vertical leg can be positive, negative, or zero. Each gives a different triangle, and we must draw all three.

The one-picture summary

One flow: a cosine voltage enters; the inductor integrates it (÷), the capacitor differentiates it (×); each ratio becomes a reactance; because reactances are shifted they stand on the vertical axis while stands on the horizontal; adding the arrows builds the impedance triangle whose hypotenuse is and whose angle is .
Recall Feynman retelling — the whole walk in plain words
I push a source that goes up-down-up-down like a cosine wave. I ask each part "how much current do you let through?" A coil hates fast changes, so I have to look at how fast the current is changing — that's a derivative — and to get the current back I undo it (integrate), which spits out a ; so the coil's pushback grows with speed. A capacitor is the opposite: its current is the derivative of the voltage, so its pushback shrinks with speed. A plain resistor's current stays in step with the voltage; a coil's or cap's current is shifted a quarter-wiggle, which in arrow-language means a right angle. So I draw resistance flat (rightward) and reactance straight up or down. To find the total pushback I add these arrows like a walk: right by , then up by , then down by . The leftover up-or-down amount is . The straight-line distance home is , and the angle I ended up tilted is the phase . That tilt tells how much real power I actually deliver.
Quick recall
Why integrate to find inductor current?
Where does 's frequency-dependence come from?
Why are and on perpendicular axes?
What does multiplying by do geometrically?
What happens to the triangle at resonance?
Connections
- Ohm's Law — every reactance was just in Ohm's-law shape.
- Complex Numbers and Phasors — supplies the " = right angle" picture.
- Capacitors, Inductors — the two component laws we integrated / differentiated.
- Resonance in RLC Circuits — the collapsed triangle case.
- RMS and Peak Values — we used peaks ; ratios are identical for RMS.
- Power in AC Circuits — the angle becomes the power factor .