Exercises — Use Norton equivalent circuits
Before we start, one shared picture of the vocabulary. A Norton equivalent is a current source (an arrow that pushes a fixed number of amps into a node no matter what) sitting next to — in parallel with — a single resistor . "Parallel" means both components connect the same two dots. The two dots are the terminals: the only place the outside world (a load) may touch the circuit.
Figure s01 — anatomy of the Norton box (read this before the exercises). The picture below shows the two-component model. On the left, the yellow circle with an up-arrow is the current source : it always injects the same amps upward into the top rail. In the middle, the blue zig-zag is the resistor , wired between the same top and bottom rails as the source — that shared wiring is what "parallel" means (both components touch the same two dots). On the right, the two red dots are the terminals; the outside voltage appears across them. Trace the loop with your eye: current leaves the source up the left wire, and at the top node it may either leak down through or flow out to the right toward the terminals. That fork is the whole story of Norton.

- = the current through a short (a plain wire, ) laid across the terminals. A short forces the terminal voltage .
- = the resistance you see looking into the terminals after you deactivate every independent source (a voltage source becomes a wire; a current source becomes a gap/open).
Where the terminal law comes from (build it, don't memorise it)
We keep using . Here is why it is true, from two circuit laws only.
Figure s02 — the single node where everything splits. Look at the top node in the picture below. Three wires meet there: the source arrow bringing in, the resistor carrying a leak current down, and the terminal wire carrying out to the load.
- Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) says: current into a node = current out of it. Nothing piles up. So .
- Ohm's Law gives the leak: the resistor has the terminal voltage across it (same two dots), so the current down through it is .
Substitute the second into the first and solve for the load current:
That is the terminal law — no memorisation, just KCL at one node plus Ohm's Law for one resistor. Every check in this page below rests on it.
Level 1 — Recognition
Exercise 1.1 (L1)
A Norton equivalent is drawn as a current source of in parallel with . The terminals are left open (nothing attached). What is the open-circuit terminal voltage ?
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT: "Open" means no load, so no current can leave through the terminals: . WHY: By the terminal law , setting forces all of through . Compute: from we get . This is exactly the Thévenin voltage (see Thévenin equivalent circuits).
Exercise 1.2 (L1)
Same source (, ). Now place a short circuit across the terminals. What current flows through the short?
Recall Solution 1.2
WHAT: A short is a wire, so across the terminals. WHY: In the terminal law the resistor's leak is . Nothing leaks, so everything the source pushes goes into the short. Compute: . The short-circuit current is — that is the whole definition.
Exercise 1.3 (L1)
A Thévenin equivalent is given: , . State its Norton twin .
Recall Solution 1.3
Rule (Source transformation): and .
- .
- . Why: Both describe the same – line. The short-circuit current of the Thévenin box is , and that is by definition .
Level 2 — Application
Exercise 2.1 (L2)
A source connects through (in series) to a node A. From node A, drops to the bottom rail. The terminals are taken across . Find the Norton equivalent .
Figure s03 — the Ex 2.1 network. The yellow battery on the left is the source; the blue zig-zag along the top is in series; the green vertical zig-zag is ; the red dots are the output terminals taken across .
Recall Solution 2.1
Step 1 — (short the terminals). Shorting the terminals joins both ends of , so sees and carries no current — it is invisible. The source then drives only : Step 2 — (kill the source). Replace the source with a wire. Now and both bridge the same two nodes (top rail joined by the wire, bottom rail) — they are in parallel: Result: , .
Exercise 2.2 (L2)
Attach a load to the Norton source from 2.1. Find the load current and load voltage .
Recall Solution 2.2
Where the current-divider comes from (derive, don't quote). The load and the Norton resistor hang across the same two terminals, so they share the same voltage . By Ohm's Law each carries and . By KCL the source current splits between them: . Solve for : Now the load current is , and the cancels: That is the current divider — it is just KCL + Ohm's Law, not a magic formula. Notice the load gets the other resistor's value on top (more resistance elsewhere ⇒ more current steered your way). Plug in: Forecast check: equal resistors ⇒ current splits in half ⇒ . ✓
Exercise 2.3 (L2)
For the Norton source , , use the terminal law to find when the load holds the terminals at .
Recall Solution 2.3
Direct substitution into (derived above from KCL): Meaning: at , the resistor leaks back, leaving for the load.
Level 3 — Analysis
Exercise 3.1 (L3)
A current source of is in parallel with ; that combination connects through (in series) out to the terminals. Find the Norton equivalent seen at the terminals.
Figure s04 — the Ex 3.1 network. The yellow current source pushes up; blue sits in parallel with it; green carries the current sideways to the red output terminals.
Recall Solution 3.1
Step 1 — (short the terminals). With the terminals shorted, the far end of is tied to the bottom rail. Now is in parallel with across the current source. The source's splits between and ; the part through reaches the short (current divider, derived in 2.2): Step 2 — (kill the source). A current source deactivates to an open (a gap). With the source opened, the only route between the two terminals runs through to node A, then through down to the bottom rail — a single file line: Why series here (not parallel)? With the current source opened, there is exactly one path from terminal to terminal, threading both resistors end-to-end. That is the definition of series. Result: , .
Exercise 3.2 (L3)
Verify Exercise 3.1 by computing the open-circuit voltage two ways: (a) directly on the original circuit, (b) as .
Recall Solution 3.2
Sign convention first. Walk from the bottom rail (call it ) up to the "+" terminal, and add a voltage rise for anything that pushes potential up, subtract a drop for anything you climb against current. We choose the top terminal as "+". (a) Original circuit, terminals open. No current can leave the open terminals, so no current flows through — it is a dead-end. By Ohm's Law a resistor with zero current has zero voltage: . So the terminal voltage equals the node-A voltage. All from the source flows through , building Then . The subtraction is there in principle (we climb across to reach the terminal), but since carries no current its drop is exactly zero, so nothing is actually lost. (b) From Norton: . ✓ They match, confirming 3.1.
Exercise 3.3 (L3)
A network gives short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage . Find and without knowing the internal layout.
Recall Solution 3.3
Key idea: is by definition the short-circuit current, and (the slope of the terminal line = intercept-voltage ÷ intercept-current).
- .
- . Why this works: the straight line hits when (short) and when . Setting gives .
Level 4 — Synthesis
Exercise 4.1 (L4)
Two sources. A source through meets a node; a source through meets the same node; from that node goes to the bottom rail. Terminals are across . Find using Source transformation.
Figure s05 — the Ex 4.1 two-source network. Two yellow battery-plus-resistor branches feed one shared node A; green drops from A to the bottom rail; red terminals sit across .
Recall Solution 4.1
Strategy: convert each voltage-plus-series-resistor branch into a Norton (current source resistor), then merge.
- Branch 1: / .
- Branch 2: / . Both current sources point into the node (both raise its potential), so add: . Their parallel resistors combine: . And is also in parallel across the terminals. Short the terminals to read : a short holds the top node at the same potential as the bottom rail, so every parallel branch has across it — by Ohm's Law each such resistor then carries and drops out. (This is why a short "kills" the parallel resistances: equal potential on both ends ⇒ no voltage ⇒ no current.) With every parallel resistor idle, the whole merged source pours straight into the short:
Exercise 4.2 (L4)
For the same circuit, find and then .
Recall Solution 4.2
— kill both sources (each wire). Now , , and all bridge the node to the bottom rail (the source wires tie their far ends to the bottom rail). Three-way parallel: : . Cross-check with Superposition later if you like — the merged model already encodes it.
Exercise 4.3 (L4)
Attach to the source of 4.1–4.2 and find the power delivered to the load.
Recall Solution 4.3
Current divider (from 2.2): (equal), so current splits in half: Power: Note: is the Maximum power transfer condition — this is the largest power any load can pull from this source.
Level 5 — Mastery
Exercise 5.1 (L5) — Degenerate case: zero source
A network has no independent sources — just resistors: from terminal to node, then from node to the other terminal, with the node also tied to nothing else. What is the Norton equivalent seen at the terminals?
Recall Solution 5.1
Step 1 — : with no sources, nothing drives current. Short the terminals → the short carries : Step 2 — : the two resistors are in series between the terminals (single-file path): Interpretation: a source-free network is just a pure resistor — the Norton current source vanishes (an open, since into a parallel resistor does nothing) and only remains. This is the limiting case where the – line passes through the origin ().
Exercise 5.2 (L5) — Degenerate case:
Suppose a network's short-circuit current is and its open-circuit voltage is infinite (the terminal voltage keeps climbing without bound as you reduce the load current). What is , and what does the equivalent become?
Recall Solution 5.2
From : if with finite , then . What it becomes: an ideal current source alone. An infinite parallel resistor is an open — it leaks nothing — so for any . The load always gets exactly no matter what. Picture: the – line is perfectly flat (horizontal at ); zero slope means infinite (slope ).
Exercise 5.3 (L5) — Full multi-source mastery
A source through feeds node A. A current source pushes into node A directly. From node A, goes to the terminals' top; the terminals' bottom is the reference rail. Find the complete Norton equivalent and the load current when is attached.
Figure s06 — the Ex 5.3 mixed-source network. A yellow battery-plus- branch and a yellow ideal current source both feed the same node A; green carries current out to the red terminals; the bottom rail is the reference.
Recall Solution 5.3
Step 1 — (short terminals). The short ties the far end of to the reference rail, so hangs between node A and the rail. Two drivers reach node A:
- The / branch → convert to Norton: .
- The ideal current source (already a current source). Merge the two current sources at node A: , with the single parallel resistor from the converted branch (the ideal source adds no parallel resistor). This at node A now splits between (down to the rail) and (out to the short). By the current divider (from 2.2), the branch through to the short gets the other resistor's share : Step 2 — (deactivate both sources: V→short, I→open). With the voltage source shorted, runs from node A to the rail. With the current source opened, its branch disappears entirely. Looking into the terminals: in series to node A, then to the rail — one single-file path: Step 3 — Attach (current divider again): Result: , , .
Answer key (at a glance)
Ex 1.1 ?
Ex 1.2 short current?
Ex 1.3 ?
Ex 2.1 ?
Ex 2.2 ?
Ex 2.3 ?
Ex 3.1 ?
Ex 3.3 ?
Ex 4.1 ?
Ex 4.2 ?
Ex 4.3 ?
Ex 5.1 ?
Ex 5.3 ?
Connections
- Use Norton equivalent circuits — the parent recipe these exercises drill.
- Thévenin equivalent circuits — the voltage-source twin used in Ex 1.1, 1.3.
- Source transformation — the engine of Ex 1.3, 4.1, 5.3.
- Ohm's Law — every and leak term.
- Kirchhoff's Current Law — the node splits in Ex 3.1, 5.3 and the terminal-law derivation.
- Maximum power transfer — the case in Ex 4.3.
- Superposition — why terminal behavior is linear and multi-source merging is legal.