This page is a shooting gallery : we list every kind of series/parallel problem that can be thrown at you, then knock each one down with a full worked solution. If a cell in the matrix below never shows up in your homework, you were still made to see it here.
Everything rests on three facts from the parent note : Ohms Law (V = I R ), KVL (series voltages add), and KCL (parallel currents add). Nothing new is assumed — every symbol below is re-earned as we use it.
Intuition Two questions unlock every problem
Before touching a formula, ask each pair of resistors: "Same current, or same voltage?"
Same current → series , resistances add . Same voltage → parallel , conductances add and R e q drops below the smallest .
Every problem you can meet lives in one of these cells. The last column names the example that hits it.
Cell
What makes it tricky
Hit by
Pure series
just add
Ex 1
Pure parallel (unequal)
must invert at the end
Ex 2
Parallel, equal resistors
shortcut R / n
Ex 3
Degenerate: a short (0 Ω ) in parallel
limiting value, R e q → 0
Ex 4
Degenerate: an open (∞ Ω ) branch
branch vanishes, ignore it
Ex 5
Mixed ladder (innermost first)
nested collapse order
Ex 6
Real-world word problem
translate words → topology
Ex 7
Exam twist: find the unknown R
work the formula backwards
Ex 8
Limiting behaviour: one R → ∞ in series/parallel
asymptotic reasoning
Ex 9
Let a resistor be a component that resists current; its size R is in ohms (Ω ). R e q = the single resistor that behaves the same seen from two terminals.
Worked example Three in a row
R 1 = 100 Ω , R 2 = 220 Ω , R 3 = 330 Ω end-to-end, driven by V = 12 V . Find R e q , the current I , and the drop across R 3 .
Forecast: guess whether R e q is bigger or smaller than 330 , and whether R 3 takes the most or least voltage.
Step 1 — Same current? All three lie on one path with no branch, so the same I flows through each ⇒ series.
Why this step? Series is defined by shared current; that lets voltages add via KVL.
Step 2 — Add. R e q = 100 + 220 + 330 = 650 Ω .
Why this step? Series ⇒ resistances add.
Step 3 — Total current by Ohm. I = R e q V = 650 12 = 0.01846 A .
Why this step? The source sees one resistor R e q ; Ohm gives the current it pushes.
Step 4 — Drop across R 3 . V 3 = I R 3 = 0.01846 × 330 = 6.09 V .
Why this step? Same I through R 3 ; Ohm again. (This is the Voltage Divider in action.)
Verify: R e q = 650 > 330 ✓ (series is biggest). Drops sum: I ( 100 + 220 + 330 ) = 0.01846 × 650 = 12 V ✓. Biggest R ate most volts ✓.
Worked example Two branches between the same nodes
R 1 = 60 Ω and R 2 = 40 Ω share two nodes at V = 6 V . Find R e q and each branch current.
Forecast: which branch carries more current — the 40 Ω or the 60 Ω ? Where will R e q land?
Step 1 — Same voltage? Both sit across the same two nodes ⇒ same V ⇒ parallel.
Why this step? Parallel is defined by shared voltage; KCL then adds the currents.
Step 2 — Product over sum. R e q = R 1 + R 2 R 1 R 2 = 100 60 × 40 = 24 Ω .
Why this step? For exactly two resistors this shortcut equals R 1 1 + R 2 1 inverted.
Step 3 — Branch currents. I 1 = 60 6 = 0.1 A , I 2 = 40 6 = 0.15 A .
Why this step? Each branch feels the full 6 V ; Ohm per branch. (The Current Divider .)
Verify: R e q = 24 < 40 , below the smallest ✓. Total I = 0.25 A ; check V / R e q = 6/24 = 0.25 A ✓. The smaller resistor (40 ) hogs more current ✓.
Worked example Five identical lamps
Five 50 Ω resistors in parallel.
Forecast: guess R e q before reading.
Step 1 — Same R , in parallel. Use the equal-resistor shortcut R e q = R / n .
Why this step? R e q 1 = R n when all n resistors equal R ; invert.
Step 2 — Compute. R e q = 5 50 = 10 Ω .
Why this step? Five equal paths each carry an equal share, so 5 × current flows at the same voltage ⇒ resistance divided by 5.
Verify: 10 < 50 ✓. Cross-check the long way: R e q 1 = 5 × 50 1 = 50 5 = 10 1 ⇒ 10 Ω ✓.
Worked example What if one branch is
0 Ω ?
R 1 = 75 Ω sits in parallel with a bare wire, R 2 = 0 Ω (a short). Find R e q .
Forecast: if one road has zero friction, how much friction does the pair have?
Step 1 — Add conductances. Conductance is R 1 (see Conductance ). The short has conductance 0 1 = ∞ .
Why this step? Parallel adds conductances; a zero-ohm path is an infinite conductance.
Step 2 — Sum dominated by ∞ . R e q 1 = 75 1 + ∞ = ∞ ⇒ R e q = 0 Ω .
Why this step? Any finite conductance is drowned out; all current takes the free path.
Verify: limiting check — let the short be ε → 0 : R e q = 75 + ε 75 ε → 0 ✓. Physically: a short-circuits its parallel partner.
Common mistake "The short just lowers the average"
No — a 0 Ω parallel branch forces the whole pair to 0 Ω , no matter how big the partner. Current abandons the resistor entirely.
Worked example What if one branch is broken (
∞ Ω )?
R 1 = 75 Ω in parallel with R 2 = ∞ (an open / cut wire).
Forecast: does a broken side road change the highway's resistance?
Step 1 — Conductance of an open is zero. R 2 1 = ∞ 1 = 0 .
Why this step? No current can cross an infinite resistance, so it adds nothing to the conductance.
Step 2 — Sum. R e q 1 = 75 1 + 0 = 75 1 ⇒ R e q = 75 Ω .
Why this step? The dead branch is invisible; only R 1 carries current.
Verify: limiting check — let the open be M → ∞ : R e q = 75 + M 75 M → 75 ✓. Series contrast: an open in series would give R e q = ∞ (breaks the one path) — opposite effect, because series shares current and parallel shares voltage.
Worked example Nested collapse
R 1 = 8 Ω in series with the parallel pair R 2 ∥ R 3 , where R 2 = 12 Ω , R 3 = 6 Ω . Driven by V = 20 V . Find R e q and total current.
Forecast: which do you simplify first — the series part or the parallel part?
Step 1 — Innermost = the parallel pair. R 23 = 12 + 6 12 × 6 = 18 72 = 4 Ω .
Why this step? Like nested parentheses, collapse the deepest cluster first. R 2 , R 3 share two nodes ⇒ parallel.
Step 2 — Now series. R 1 carries the same current as the collapsed R 23 ⇒ series: R e q = 8 + 4 = 12 Ω .
Why this step? Once R 23 is one block, it and R 1 lie end-to-end.
Step 3 — Total current. I = 12 20 = 1.667 A .
Verify: R 23 = 4 < 6 (below smallest) ✓; R e q = 12 > 8 (series grew it) ✓. This is exactly Equivalent Resistance and Network Reduction .
Worked example The workshop heater
A heater has two identical 20 Ω coils. On HIGH they're wired in parallel; on LOW in series. The wall gives 240 V . Find the power on each setting. (P = V 2 / R e q ; see Power Dissipation in Resistors .)
Forecast: which setting is actually hotter — series or parallel?
Step 1 — HIGH (parallel). R e q = 2 20 = 10 Ω .
Why this step? Two equal in parallel ⇒ R / n . Lower resistance.
Step 2 — Power HIGH. P = R e q V 2 = 10 24 0 2 = 10 57600 = 5760 W .
Why this step? Same wall voltage; lower R ⇒ more current ⇒ more power (P = V 2 / R ).
Step 3 — LOW (series). R e q = 20 + 20 = 40 Ω , P = 40 24 0 2 = 1440 W .
Why this step? Series is biggest R ⇒ least power at fixed voltage.
Verify: ratio 5760/1440 = 4 — parallel is 4 × hotter, matching R dropping by 4 × (40 → 10 ) ✓. Units: V 2 /Ω = W ✓. So "parallel = HIGH" is correct.
Worked example Find the missing resistor
You need R e q = 8 Ω from R 1 = 24 Ω in parallel with an unknown R 2 . Find R 2 .
Forecast: must R 2 be bigger or smaller than 8 Ω ? (Trick: R e q must be below the smallest resistor, so both partners exceed 8 .)
Step 1 — Write the parallel law. 8 1 = 24 1 + R 2 1 .
Why this step? Parallel = conductances add; we know R e q and R 1 , one unknown.
Step 2 — Isolate. R 2 1 = 8 1 − 24 1 = 24 3 − 1 = 24 2 = 12 1 .
Why this step? Subtract the known conductance; work in R 1 land, invert last.
Step 3 — Invert. R 2 = 12 Ω .
Why this step? R 2 1 is a conductance; the resistor is its reciprocal.
Verify: 24 + 12 24 × 12 = 36 288 = 8 Ω ✓. And 12 > 8 , consistent with the forecast that both partners exceed R e q ✓.
Common mistake Forgetting to invert at Step 3
Stopping at 12 1 and calling it "R 2 = 0.083 " gives a nonsense tiny resistor. The reciprocal is the resistance.
Worked example Push one resistor to infinity
With R 1 = 100 Ω fixed, describe R e q as R 2 → ∞ for (a) series, (b) parallel.
Forecast: in which case does the giant resistor take over, and in which is it ignored?
Step 1 — Series limit. R e q = 100 + R 2 → ∞ .
Why this step? Series adds; a huge resistor in the single path chokes all current — it dominates .
Step 2 — Parallel limit. R e q = 100 + R 2 100 R 2 → 100 .
Why this step? A huge parallel branch has near-zero conductance, contributing nothing; current just ignores it (same as the open in Ex 5).
Verify: at R 2 = 1 0 6 : series = 1 , 000 , 100 Ω (→∞) ✓; parallel = 100 + 1 0 6 100 ⋅ 1 0 6 = 99.99 Ω → 100 ✓. Two opposite fates from the same "big resistor," decided purely by same-current vs same-voltage.
Recall Which cell is this?
Q: "0 Ω across a resistor" and "∞ Ω in series" both do the same drastic thing — what?
A ::: Both drive R e q to an extreme by removing the resistor's effect — a parallel short forces R e q = 0 ; a series open forces R e q = ∞ . Same intuition, mirrored by the same-voltage / same-current duality.
Recall Backwards problems
Q: To find an unknown R 2 in a parallel target, what's the safe procedure?
A ::: Work in conductances: R 2 1 = R e q 1 − R 1 1 , then invert last .