2.7.11 · D4Redox & Electrochemistry (Intro)

Exercises — Corrosion — electrochemical mechanism; cathodic protection, galvanization

2,345 words11 min readBack to topic

Level 1 — Recognition

Exercise 1.1

An iron object is left in moist air. Two regions form on its surface: at region P iron dissolves; at region Q oxygen from the air is consumed. Name each region (anode / cathode) and write the half-reaction happening there.

Recall Solution

What we're deciding: which region loses electrons and which gains them.

  • Where iron dissolves, iron atoms are turning into and releasing electrons. Losing electrons is oxidation, and the oxidation site is the anode.
  • Where oxygen is consumed, is grabbing those electrons. Gaining electrons is reduction, and the reduction site is the cathode. Answer: P = anode, Q = cathode.

Exercise 1.2

Of the metals gold () and iron (), which corrodes readily and why?

Recall Solution

Corrosion is oxidation of the metal. A metal is oxidised easily when it is reluctant to stay reduced — i.e. when its reduction potential is negative.

  • Iron: (negative) → gives up electrons willingly → corrodes readily.
  • Gold: (strongly positive) → clings to its electrons → essentially does not corrode. Answer: Iron corrodes; gold does not.

Level 2 — Application

Exercise 2.1

Using the table, compute the standard cell potential for iron corroding by the neutral-oxygen route: Is corrosion spontaneous?

Recall Solution

Why this formula: tells us the "push" driving electrons around the loop; positive push = spontaneous.

  • Cathode (reduction, oxygen):
  • Anode (oxidation, iron): its reduction value is Positive → the process releases energy → spontaneous. (Confirm with .) Answer: , spontaneous.

Exercise 2.2

For the reaction in 2.1, electrons are transferred. Compute in kJ using .

Recall Solution

Why : it converts the cell voltage into an energy per mole of reaction — the language of Gibs Free Energy and thermodynamic spontaneity. Negative → spontaneous, consistent with 2.1. Answer: .


Level 3 — Analysis

Exercise 3.1 (Nernst)

A ship-hull microcell operates at by the acidic route Conditions: , (pH 8), . Find .

Recall Solution

Why Nernst: standard assumes 1 M / 1 atm everything. Real seawater is dilute and basic, so we correct with Nernst Equation: (Pure solids/liquids like Fe and H₂O don't appear in .)

Step 1 — reaction quotient: Step 2 — correction term: Step 3: Still strongly positive → corrosion persists in seawater. Answer: .

Exercise 3.2 (Differential aeration)

An iron plate is half-buried in wet sand. Explain, using oxygen concentration, why the buried part corrodes faster than the exposed part — the opposite of what beginners guess.

Recall Solution

Key idea (differential aeration): the region starved of oxygen becomes the anode; the oxygen-rich region becomes the cathode.

  • Exposed part: plenty of → good cathode → happens here, metal is protected.
  • Buried part: little → forced to be the anode → → this metal dissolves. The oxygen-poor buried metal corrodes faster. Answer: the buried, oxygen-poor region is the anode and pits fastest.

Level 4 — Synthesis

Exercise 4.1 (Choosing a sacrificial anode)

An iron pipeline must be protected. Available: Cu (), Sn (), Zn (), Mg (). Which metals can act as a sacrificial anode, and which is the strongest protector? Give the criterion.

Recall Solution

Criterion: the sacrificial metal must be more easily oxidised than iron, i.e. it must have . Then it becomes the anode and corrodes instead of the iron, which is forced to be the cathode.

  • Cu ✗ (nobler — would make Fe the anode!)
  • Sn ✗ (still nobler than Fe)
  • Zn
  • Mg ✓ (most negative → strongest protector) Answer: Zn and Mg work; Mg protects most strongly.

Exercise 4.2 (Galvanic cell of protection)

For Zn protecting Fe in aerated seawater, write both half-reactions, the overall equation, and compute .

Recall Solution

Anode (Zn, the sacrifice): Cathode (oxygen reduction, on the Fe surface): Balance electrons (×2 on Zn), add: Answer: ; Zn dissolves, Fe is spared.

Exercise 4.3 (Galvanization vs tin-plating)

Both zinc-coated ("galvanised") and tin-coated iron protect the surface. When the coating is scratched exposing bare iron, one keeps protecting and the other makes corrosion worse. Which is which, and why?

Figure — Corrosion — electrochemical mechanism; cathodic protection, galvanization
Recall Solution

Compare the coating's to iron's (see figure: the green bar sits below iron, the red bar above).

  • Zinc (): even at a scratch, Zn is still the anode → Zn corrodes, Fe stays cathode. Protection continues. This is genuine cathodic protection (sacrificial coating).
  • Tin (): Sn is nobler than Fe. At a scratch, the exposed Fe becomes the anode of a small Fe–Sn cell and corrodes faster than bare iron would. Tin only protects as long as it's an unbroken barrier. Answer: Zinc keeps protecting; scratched tin accelerates iron corrosion.

Level 5 — Mastery

Exercise 5.1 (Faraday — anode lifetime)

A magnesium sacrificial anode of mass protects a buried tank. The protective current is a steady . Estimate the anode's lifetime in years. ( molar mass , , .)

Recall Solution

Why Faraday: Faraday's Laws link charge passed to moles of metal dissolved: . We invert it to solve for .

Step 1 — total charge to consume all Mg: Step 2 — time at (): Step 3 — convert to years (): Answer: years.

Exercise 5.2 (Impressed current — power)

For the same tank an impressed-current system drives against a back-EMF equivalent of . Over one year, how much electrical energy (in kJ, then kWh) does it consume? Compare it conceptually with the sacrificial method.

Recall Solution

Why energy: impressed-current protection uses an external DC source (parent note, method B), so it costs electricity, not metal.

Charge in one year: . Energy: . In kWh: . Trade-off: sacrificial = no running power but you replace the block (here every ~6 yr); impressed-current = small ongoing energy bill (~9 kWh/yr) but the inert anode lasts far longer. Choice depends on structure size and access. Answer: per year.

Exercise 5.3 (Full synthesis — passivation contrast)

Aluminium () is more negative than iron () yet an aluminium ladder left outdoors barely corrodes while iron rusts through. Explain the thermodynamics-vs-kinetics resolution, naming the phenomenon.

Recall Solution

Thermodynamics says Al should corrode even more eagerly than Fe (more negative ). Kinetics overrides it: Al instantly forms a thin, dense, adherent film that seals the surface — the metal beneath is cut off from oxygen and water. This is passivation (see Passivation). By contrast, iron's oxide (rust) is porous and flaky, offering no seal, so corrosion tunnels inward. Answer: Al is thermodynamically reactive but kinetically protected by a passivating layer; Fe's oxide fails to passivate.

Recall Quick self-test

Sacrificial anode must have compared to protected metal ::: more negative (more easily oxidised) Scratched tin coating on iron does what ::: accelerates iron corrosion (Fe becomes anode) Buried (low-O₂) part of a plate acts as ::: the anode (differential aeration) Al resists corrosion despite negative because of ::: passivation (dense Al₂O₃ film) formula ::: (both as reduction potentials)