2.6.3 · D4Equilibrium

Exercises — Relationship Kp = Kc(RT)^Δn

3,776 words17 min readBack to topic
Recall The four things you need at your fingertips

Formula reveal ::: Meaning of ::: gaseous products minus gaseous reactants (count ONLY gases) Temperature unit ::: always kelvin, for atm & mol L⁻¹ ::: for the energy equation :::

Figure 1 — how the sign of decides the vs comparison.

Figure — Relationship Kp = Kc(RT)^Δn

Alt-text / caption: A chalkboard bar chart. The horizontal axis lists five values of from to ; each bar is the resulting when and (that is at ). The vertical axis is on a log scale so the huge range fits. The white dashed line marks : bars below it (pink, ) are cases where ; the middle bar (yellow, ) sits exactly on the line, ; bars above it (blue, ) are . How to use Figure 1 in an exercise: find your on the axis, read whether that bar is below/on/above the dashed line, and you instantly know the direction of the comparison — provided , which every worked example on this page satisfies except the deliberately-constructed Exercise 5.5 (see the L1 mistake box for the caveat).


Level 1 — Recognition

(Can you read off and pick the right relationship without a calculator?)

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT we do: count gas moles on each side. Products: (that's the ). Reactants: (the and ). WHY: is always products − reactants, gases only. Since and , the factor , so . (On Figure 1 this is a pink bar below the dashed line.) Answer ::: , and .

Recall Solution 1.2

Products: . Reactants: . WHY it matters: whenever the number of gas molecules doesn't change across the arrow, the two constants are numerically identical — the 's cancel perfectly. Notice this conclusion needs no assumption about whether is above or below , because anything to the power is . (Figure 1: the yellow bar sitting exactly on the dashed line.) Answer ::: , so .

Recall Solution 1.3

Compute for each:

  • (a) → (with )
  • (b)
  • (c) Answer ::: only (a) gives .

Level 2 — Application

(Plug numbers in; watch units and the sign of the exponent.)

Recall Solution 2.1

Step 1 — : products , reactant , so . Step 2 — substitute: Step 3 — evaluate: . WHY ? and , so we multiply by something bigger than one. Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 2.2

Step 1 — : product , reactants , . Step 2 — rearrange the master formula for : With , this is . Step 3 — evaluate: . Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 2.3

. Answer ::: .


Level 3 — Analysis

(Now some species are solids/liquids, or the temperature is disguised.)

Recall Solution 3.1

Step 1 — count ONLY gases: the only gas is (product). and are solids and do not enter or at all. Step 2: . Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 3.2

Step 1 — temperature: is Celsius. Convert: . Step 2 — : gases are and (two products), solid ignored. Step 3: . Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 3.3

Step 1 — (gases only): products (the ), reactant gas (the ); solid carbon excluded. Step 2 — solve for : . . Answer ::: .


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Combine the formula with related equilibrium ideas.)

Recall Solution 4.1

(a) . (b) Increasing pressure squeezes the system; by Le Chatelier's Principle equilibrium shifts toward the side with fewer gas moles to relieve the squeeze. That side is the products ( vs ), so yield of rises. (c) The negative is exactly the signature that products occupy fewer gas moles. The same that makes (when , so ) is what tells Le Chatelier "products are the low-volume side." One number, two consequences. Answer ::: ; higher pressure increases yield; negative marks the fewer-moles (product) side in both frameworks.

Recall Solution 4.2

WHY use (not ) here, and which ? The thermodynamic relation uses the dimensionless pressure-based constant for gases. To make dimensionless you divide each partial pressure by the standard pressure before forming the ratio:

= K_p\,(p^\circ)^{-\Delta n} \quad\text{with } p^\circ = 1\ \text{bar}.$$ Since $p^\circ = 1\ \text{bar}$ numerically, dividing by it does not change the *number* $8.8$ but it **does** strip the units, leaving a pure dimensionless $K^\circ = 8.8$. That is the value that goes inside $\ln$. Note the deliberate double switch versus earlier problems: those used $R = 0.0821\ \text{L atm K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}$ to convert $K_p\!\leftrightarrow\!K_c$, but an **energy** result in joules needs $R = 8.314\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}$ (the tiny $1\ \text{atm}$ vs $1\ \text{bar}$ standard-state difference is ignored at exam level). $$\ln(8.8) = 2.1748$$ $$\Delta G^\circ = -(8.314\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1})(298\ \text{K})(2.1748) = -5388\ \text{J mol}^{-1} \approx -5.39\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}$$ Because $\Delta G^\circ < 0$, the forward reaction is **spontaneous** in the standard state. Answer ::: $K^\circ = 8.8$ (dimensionless); $\Delta G^\circ \approx -5.39\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}$, spontaneous.

Level 5 — Mastery

(Multi-step; reverse-engineering; degenerate and limiting cases.)

Recall Solution 5.1

WHAT we need: solve for the unknown exponent . WHY logarithms? sits in an exponent; the tool that pulls an exponent down into a multiplier is the logarithm. That is exactly the question " is which power of ?" Step 1 — isolate the power by dividing both sides by : Step 2 — take the natural log of both sides. Using : Step 3 — isolate by dividing by . With : Step 4 — round to an integer. must be a whole number (a difference of integer mole counts); rounds cleanly to . (The tiny excess over comes from the problem's rounded input ; the exact giving is .) Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 5.2

Step 1 — : products , reactants , . Step 2 — the degenerate case: for every value of . Temperature drops out of the conversion entirely. WHY this matters: for reactions, pressure- and concentration-based constants are the same number regardless of . (The value of itself can still change with through thermodynamics — but the equality is temperature-proof.) Answer ::: at both temperatures (and all ), because .

Recall Solution 5.3

Step 1 — strip non-gases: and are liquids → excluded. The only gas is (product, coefficient ). Step 2: . Answer ::: .

Recall Solution 5.4

(a) . . (b) At : . Comment: with , doubling (from to ) doubles , hence doubles the conversion factor — so doubles from to , even if held fixed. This isolates the pure "-conversion" effect from the deeper thermodynamic temperature dependence. Answer ::: (a) ; (b) — the conversion factor scales linearly with when .

Recall Solution 5.5

Step 1 — the factor. , so . Step 2 — evaluate. Step 3 — compare. . So is SMALLER than even though . WHY the shortcut fails here: the shortcut "" secretly assumes (so that raising it to a positive power makes it bigger). Here , and raising a number below to a positive power makes it smaller — so the inequality flips. This is exactly the L1 trap made concrete. On Figure 1 the bars assume ; that picture would look upside-down for . Answer ::: , which is smaller than ; the shortcut does not hold because .


#recall check

Recall Rapid self-quiz (reveal after answering)

Solve for from : what exponent on ? ::: (the negative of ). , ::: (only the two product gases count). When is at all temperatures? ::: when , because for every . Which for ? ::: . How do you pull out of an exponent? ::: take logarithms: . When can still give ? ::: if , so the shortcut needs to hold.


Connections