Visual walkthrough — Critical constants Tc, Pc, Vc; law of corresponding states
Prerequisites we lean on: the Van der Waals Equation of State, Real Gases and Compressibility Factor Z, Liquefaction of Gases and Andrews Isotherms, and the plain Ideal Gas Equation.
Step 1 — Draw the thing we are studying: a – isotherm
WHAT. Fix the temperature of one mole of gas. Slowly squeeze it: reduce the volume and watch the pressure . Plot (up) against (across). One temperature gives one curve — an isotherm (iso = same, therm = heat).
WHY. Liquefaction is a shape event on this plot. A gas is a smoothly falling curve. A liquid forming shows up as a flat plateau (pressure stops changing while volume shrinks — gas is turning to liquid). So the whole story of "can we make a liquid?" is "does the curve have a flat plateau?".
PICTURE. Below, three curves at three temperatures.

- Bottom (blue) curve, : a wide plateau — gas and liquid coexist here.
- Middle (yellow) curve, : the plateau has shrunk to a single kink point.
- Top (pink) curve, : no flat part at all — pressing only ever gives a dense gas, never a liquid.
The special middle curve, and the special point on it, is what we chase.
Step 2 — Give the curve an equation: van der Waals, solved for
WHAT. We need a formula for that curve. The Van der Waals Equation of State for one mole is Solve for so we have "height as a function of across":
Term by term:
- = gas constant (a fixed number, ), = temperature — together sets the overall "push".
- = the volume the molecules themselves occupy, so = the free space left to move in. Making the denominator (not just ) is what stops the pressure staying finite as we squeeze — see the wall.
- = strength of intermolecular attraction; the term pulls the pressure down because molecules tugging each other inward hit the walls less hard.
WHY split it this way. The two terms fight. shoots up as (a wall). dives down as gets small. When these two fights nearly balance, the curve can go momentarily flat — and that flatness is the plateau. So the plateau is literally a tug-of-war between and .
PICTURE. The two pieces and their sum.

Step 3 — Say "flat" and "straight" in symbols: the two derivative conditions
WHAT. We want the temperature and place where the plateau has shrunk to a single point. That point is where the curve does two things at once:
- Its tangent is horizontal (the leftover of the flat plateau).
- It changes from concave-down to concave-up — an inflection, i.e. it is momentarily straight.
WHY a derivative? A derivative is just the slope of the curve — "how much does height change per step across". A slope of means flat. The second derivative measures how the slope itself is changing — the bending (curvature). Curvature means not bending — momentarily straight. This is exactly the tool we need because we are describing a shape, and derivatives are the language of slope and bend. No other tool reads "flat + straight" off a curve so directly.
PICTURE. Watch the tangent line and the curvature as rises toward .

- : the curve dips and rises — the slope goes negative then positive, so somewhere it's zero, but it's still bending (a real min/max, not straight).
- : the dip flattens out completely — slope zero and no bend. Both conditions true at the same . That is the critical point.
Step 4 — Do the two derivatives
WHAT. Differentiate with respect to , twice, and set each to zero.
First derivative (slope):
Second derivative (curvature):
WHY. Each derivative just applies the power rule to the two terms of Step 2. The signs tell the story: in the push pulls the slope negative and the pull pushes it positive — they cancel at the flat spot. In the two curvatures cancel at the straight spot.
PICTURE. The two conditions as two curves crossing zero.

Step 5 — Divide equation (2) by (1): kill , harvest
WHAT. Divide the second condition by the first. Almost everything cancels:
\;\Rightarrow\; \frac{2}{V-b} = \frac{3}{V}.$$ **Term by term:** on the left $R,T$ cancel and one power of $(V-b)$ survives; on the right $a$ cancels and one power of $V$ survives. The *physics constants vanish* — what's left is **pure geometry** of where the curve straightens. Cross-multiply: $$2V = 3(V-b) \;\Rightarrow\; 2V = 3V - 3b \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{V_c = 3b}.$$ **WHY divide?** Because dividing is the cleanest way to annihilate the messy shared factors ($R$, $T$, $a$) and isolate the *location* $V$. The critical volume is **three times the excluded volume $b$** — not equal to it. (See the [!mistake] in the parent: molecules can't be crushed down to $b$.) **PICTURE.** The critical point sits at $V_c=3b$, comfortably to the right of the "wall" at $V=b$. ![[deepdives/dd-chemistry-2.4.09-d2-s05.png]] --- ## Step 6 — Back-substitute $V_c=3b$ into (1): harvest $T_c$ **WHAT.** Put $V_c=3b$ into condition $(1)$. Then $V_c-b = 3b-b = 2b$: $$\frac{RT_c}{(2b)^2} = \frac{2a}{(3b)^3} \;\Rightarrow\; \frac{RT_c}{4b^2} = \frac{2a}{27b^3}.$$ Multiply both sides by $4b^2$: $$RT_c = \frac{2a}{27b^3}\cdot 4b^2 = \frac{8a}{27b} \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{T_c = \frac{8a}{27Rb}}.$$ **Term by term:** $(2b)^2 = 4b^2$ is the free-space term squared; $(3b)^3=27b^3$ is the full volume cubed. The clean numbers $4, 27, 8$ are just what these powers of $2$ and $3$ produce. **WHY.** With the *place* $V_c$ known, condition $(1)$ turns into a plain equation for the one thing left — the *temperature* $T_c$. Bigger attraction $a$ ⇒ higher $T_c$ (harder-attracting gases liquefy more easily, up to a higher ceiling). Bigger $b$ ⇒ lower $T_c$. **PICTURE.** $T_c$ is the temperature of the one isotherm whose kink is the critical point. ![[deepdives/dd-chemistry-2.4.09-d2-s06.png]] --- ## Step 7 — Plug $V_c, T_c$ into the equation of state: harvest $P_c$ **WHAT.** Read the *height* of the critical point straight off the curve $P = \dfrac{RT}{V-b} - \dfrac{a}{V^2}$ using $V=V_c=3b$, $T=T_c=\tfrac{8a}{27Rb}$: $$P_c = \frac{R\cdot \frac{8a}{27Rb}}{2b} - \frac{a}{(3b)^2} = \frac{8a}{27b\cdot 2b} - \frac{a}{9b^2} = \frac{8a}{54b^2} - \frac{a}{9b^2}.$$ Common denominator $27b^2$: $$P_c = \frac{4a}{27b^2} - \frac{3a}{27b^2} = \boxed{\frac{a}{27b^2}}.$$ **Term by term:** $R$ cancels inside the first fraction (an $R$ up top, an $R$ hidden in $T_c$), $\frac{8a}{54b^2}=\frac{4a}{27b^2}$, and $\frac{a}{9b^2}=\frac{3a}{27b^2}$. The subtraction leaves a single $a$ over $27b^2$. **WHY.** $V_c$ was the *where*, $T_c$ was the *which curve*; $P_c$ is simply the *height* of the point once both are pinned. Nothing new — just evaluation. **PICTURE.** All three constants marked on the one critical isotherm. ![[deepdives/dd-chemistry-2.4.09-d2-s07.png]] --- ## Step 8 — The degenerate check: what happens for $T>T_c$ and $T<T_c$? **WHAT.** We *assumed* a point where slope and curvature both vanish exists. Does it always? No — only exactly at $T=T_c$. - **$T<T_c$:** the isotherm has a real wiggle. $\partial P/\partial V$ is zero at **two** places (a local min and a local max of the van der Waals loop). The physical plateau (from an [[Liquefaction of Gases and Andrews Isotherms|Andrews isotherm]]) replaces this wiggle. Liquefaction is possible. - **$T=T_c$:** the two zeros of the slope **merge** into one — the inflection with horizontal tangent. Exactly our derivation. This merging is *why* we needed *both* derivatives to be zero: a double root. - **$T>T_c$:** $\partial P/\partial V$ is **never** zero — the curve is monotonically falling. No flat spot, no plateau, no liquid. You get a [[Supercritical Fluids|supercritical fluid]] instead. **WHY it matters.** The condition "first *and* second derivative zero" is precisely the algebraic fingerprint of "two turning points colliding into one." That collision *is* the critical point. Below, they haven't collided; above, they never existed. **PICTURE.** The two turning points sliding together as $T\to T_c$, then vanishing above. ![[deepdives/dd-chemistry-2.4.09-d2-s08.png]] > [!mistake] "Any horizontal tangent is the critical point." > **Why it feels right:** the plateau is flat, so flatness seems enough. **Fix:** below $T_c$ there are *two* flat-ish turning points on the vdW loop and neither is the critical point. Only when they **merge** (adding the curvature-zero condition) do you get the true critical point. That's why one derivative isn't enough — you need both. --- ## The one-picture summary ![[deepdives/dd-chemistry-2.4.09-d2-s09.png]] One isotherm at $T_c$, one inflection point, three read-offs: $$V_c = 3b \;\;(\text{where}), \qquad T_c=\frac{8a}{27Rb}\;\;(\text{which curve}), \qquad P_c=\frac{a}{27b^2}\;\;(\text{how high}),$$ all born from the single geometric statement "**flat and straight at the same spot**": $$\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}=0 \quad\text{and}\quad \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial V^2}=0.$$ > [!recall]- Feynman retelling (say it in plain words) > Picture pressing on a gas at a fixed temperature and drawing how the pressure climbs as the volume drops. Cold enough, and the line goes dead flat for a while — that flat stretch is the gas quietly turning into a liquid. Warm it up and that flat stretch gets shorter. At one magic temperature the flat stretch shrinks to a single dot: the curve is flat *and* dead straight there for just an instant. "Flat" is the slope being zero; "straight" is the bending being zero. Slope and bending are exactly what the two derivatives measure, so we set both to zero. Van der Waals gives a formula for the curve, so we differentiate it twice, set both to zero, and divide one equation by the other — all the messy constants ($R$, $T$, $a$) evaporate, leaving a tidy geometric fact: the magic volume is three times the molecules' own size, $V_c=3b$. Feed that back in and out pop the magic temperature and pressure. Hotter than that temperature, the flat dot never forms — no liquid, just a supercritical haze. Colder, and there are two little turning points instead of one; the critical point is the exact instant those two collide. > [!recall]- Quick self-check > Why two derivative conditions, not one? ::: One gives horizontal tangent (flat); the second gives zero curvature (straight/inflection). The critical point needs both, because it's where two turning points merge into a single double point. > Why divide equation (2) by (1)? ::: To cancel $R$, $T$ and $a$ at once, leaving a pure geometric relation that yields $V_c=3b$. > What is $V_c$ in terms of $b$, and why not $V_c=b$? ::: $V_c=3b$; molecules cannot be crushed to their own excluded volume $b$ even at the critical point. --- Related: [[Real Gases and Compressibility Factor Z]] uses these constants to build $Z_c=\tfrac{3}{8}$; [[Supercritical Fluids]] is the $T>T_c$ region of Step 8; [[Intermolecular Forces]] is the physical meaning of $a$.