2.4.9 · D4States of Matter (Quantitative)

Exercises — Critical constants Tc, Pc, Vc; law of corresponding states

2,091 words10 min readBack to topic

The three master results you will lean on the whole page:


Level 1 — Recognition

Exercise 1.1

State the two mathematical conditions that pin down the critical point on a isotherm, and say in plain words what each one means geometrically.

Recall Solution

  • First derivative : the isotherm has a horizontal tangent — the curve is momentarily flat, so a tiny change in volume causes no change in pressure. This is the last trace of the "liquefaction plateau."
  • Second derivative : zero curvature — the curve neither smiles nor frowns; it is an inflection point where it switches from concave to convex.

The figure below draws three isotherms from the reduced equation of state, one for each temperature regime, so you can see both conditions being born at once.

Figure — Critical constants Tc, Pc, Vc; law of corresponding states

Reading the figure. The magenta curve () has a genuine flat segment — a whole stretch of constant pressure where liquid and gas coexist (the liquefaction plateau). As temperature rises, that flat segment shrinks. On the violet curve () it has collapsed to the single navy dot at : there the dashed navy line shows the tangent is exactly horizontal (first condition) and the curve stops curving one way and starts curving the other (second condition) — flatness and straightness meet at one point. The orange curve () has no flat part at all: raising pressure just smoothly compresses the fluid, so no liquid can ever separate out. That is why is a hard ceiling for liquefaction.

Exercise 1.2

Write , , in terms of the van der Waals constants , (and ). Then compute the critical compressibility factor these predict.

Recall Solution

Notice every , , cancels — the answer is a pure number, the same for every gas vdW describes.


Level 2 — Application

Exercise 2.1

For CO₂, and . Find the van der Waals constants and .

Recall Solution

Step 1 — get from the pair . Why this combination? We have two experimental numbers, and , and two unknowns, and . If we divide by , the unknown appears in both numerator and denominator and cancels, leaving an equation in alone — so we can solve for directly without ever knowing : (Bonus: this also dodges the poorly-measured .) Step 2 — get from now that is known:

Exercise 2.2

Using the constants from 2.1, predict CO₂'s critical molar volume and verify .

Recall Solution

The near-exact 0.375 confirms our arithmetic reproduces the universal vdW value.

Exercise 2.3

Gas A has , gas B has . At what actual temperatures are they in corresponding states with ?

Recall Solution

Reduced temperature , so : Different real temperatures, but the same fraction of their critical temperatures — so (at equal ) they share the same and the same reduced volume .


Level 3 — Analysis

Exercise 3.1

A real gas is measured to have . Van der Waals predicts . Compute the percentage error of the vdW prediction and state what the mismatch tells you physically.

Recall Solution

vdW over-predicts by about . Physically: the vdW and corrections are too crude near the critical point (attractions actually vary with distance and molecules are soft, not hard spheres). So vdW is only qualitatively right there — better equations like Redlich–Kwong push down toward the observed .

Exercise 3.2

Show that directly, and use it to find for a gas with and (this is N₂).

Recall Solution

From , multiply both sides by : Solve for : (Experimental N₂ — the vdW estimate is the right order and a bit high, exactly as the imperfect warns.)

Exercise 3.3

Two gases are each brought to and . Without knowing which gases they are, what is their common reduced volume ? Justify using the reduced equation of state.

Recall Solution

Plug , into the reduced equation: By definition the critical point is . Check: ✓ So : all gases at their critical point sit at reduced volume 1 — that is precisely what "corresponding states" guarantees. No gas-specific data was needed.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Exercise 4.1

Starting from , derive from scratch using the two critical conditions. (Reproduce the full inflection argument.)

Recall Solution

First derivative (horizontal tangent): Second derivative (zero curvature): Divide (2) by (1) (kills , leaving pure geometry): Cross-multiply: . Hence .

Exercise 4.2

Using and condition (1), derive , then obtain .

Recall Solution

With , we have . Put both into (1): Now solve for by multiplying both sides by : Multiply the numbers () and cancel the powers of (): Now plug and back into the vdW equation for :

Exercise 4.3

Derive the reduced (universal) equation of state by substituting , , into the vdW equation, showing every cancellation.

Recall Solution

Start: . Substitute , , : Factor from the first bracket and from the second: Since : Cancel on both sides: No , , or survives — the equation is identical for every gas.


Level 5 — Mastery

Exercise 5.1

A gas obeys vdW with and (this is O₂). Compute , , , and confirm numerically.

Recall Solution

Check: ✓ (Experimental O₂: K, atm — a genuinely excellent match here.)

Exercise 5.2

Prove that the ratio equals for any vdW gas, purely symbolically, and explain why this is the reciprocal of .

Recall Solution

Every gas-specific quantity cancels, so the value is universal. It is the reciprocal of because and indeed . ✓

Exercise 5.3

The reduced equation gives as a function of only. Using (the reduced form of ), derive an expression for in terms of and alone, and evaluate it at , .

Recall Solution

From the reduced equation solve for : Since and , the reduced form is . Substitute and multiply through by keep the factor of 3 on both terms: The first term came from (the cancels, the stays). At , : So : less than 1, telling us attractions still dominate at this moderately expanded state. The key deliverable is the universal formula , which depends on nothing but reduced variables — the whole point of corresponding states. (See Real Gases and Compressibility Factor Z for the empirical chart version.)