Exercises — Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) — LCAO, bonding - antibonding orbitals
Two tools you will use constantly, restated in plain words so nothing is assumed:
Before we start, here is the master picture — the two energy ladders (orbital orders) you will pour electrons into using Aufbau, Pauli and Hund.

Level 1 — Recognition
L1.1
State what the letters LCAO stand for, and in one sentence say what operation it performs on atomic orbitals.
Recall Solution
LCAO = Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals. It builds each molecular orbital by adding (, in phase → bonding) and subtracting (, out of phase → antibonding) the atomic-orbital wavefunctions of the joining atoms. Two atomic orbitals in → two molecular orbitals out. This is the machinery behind σ and π bonds in MO language.
L1.2
For each combination, say whether it forms a σ or a π molecular orbital, or no bond at all: (a) with , (b) with (both perpendicular to the axis), (c) with (both along the axis), (d) with .
Recall Solution
(a) σ — two round clouds overlap head-on, density is symmetric about the axis. (b) π — sideways overlap; the orbital has a nodal plane containing the axis. (c) σ — head-on overlap along the axis. (d) No bond. One orbital is symmetric and the other antisymmetric about the axis, so the positive-lobe overlap exactly cancels the negative-lobe overlap. The overlap integral (defined at the top of the page) works out to : the same-sign overlap on one side is exactly undone by opposite-sign overlap on the other. This is the "same symmetry" condition for atomic orbitals to combine.
Level 2 — Application
L2.1
Write the MO configuration of H₂ (2 electrons total) and compute its bond order.
Recall Solution
Fill the lowest MO first: . (both in bonding), . One single bond. All electrons paired → diamagnetic. Matches reality. ✅
L2.2
Write the MO configuration of He₂ (4 electrons) and compute its bond order. Does it exist?
Recall Solution
. , . The antibonding pair cancels the bonding pair → no net bond → He₂ does not exist as a stable molecule. This is MOT's classic win over VBT.
L2.3
Compute the bond order of the ion He₂⁺ (3 electrons). Does removing one electron help?
Recall Solution
. , . A half bond — small but positive, so He₂⁺ does exist (it is observed spectroscopically). We removed an antibonding electron, so less "push away" survives, and a weak bond appears.
Level 3 — Analysis
L3.1
Using the light ladder, write the full configuration of N₂ (14 electrons), find its bond order, and state its magnetism.
Recall Solution
N₂ has 7 electrons per atom → 14 total. Use the light ladder (N is "nitrogen and below"): Count bonding: . Count antibonding: . A triple bond — that is why N₂ is famously inert and hard to break. Every orbital is doubly filled → no unpaired electrons → diamagnetic.
L3.2
Now do O₂ (16 electrons) with the heavy ladder. Bond order? Number of unpaired electrons? Magnetism?
Recall Solution
O has 8 electrons per atom → 16 total. Use the heavy ladder ( below ): The last two electrons must go one each into the two equal-energy orbitals — that is Hund's rule (spread out before pairing up). Bonding electrons: . Antibonding electrons: . Two orbitals hold a lonely electron → 2 unpaired electrons → paramagnetic. VBT's O=O picture wrongly says diamagnetic; MOT nails it. ✅
L3.3
Rank the bond orders of N₂, O₂, F₂ and hence predict which has the shortest bond. (F₂ = 18 electrons, heavy ladder.)
Recall Solution
N₂: B.O. = 3 (from L3.1). O₂: B.O. = 2 (from L3.2). F₂: add two more electrons to O₂'s config, filling both to . Bonding = 10, antibonding = . So N₂ (3) > O₂ (2) > F₂ (1). Higher bond order → shorter, stronger bond, so N₂ has the shortest bond, F₂ the longest of the three.
Level 4 — Synthesis
L4.1
B₂ (10 electrons) is measured to be paramagnetic. Show, using the correct ladder, that MOT reproduces this — and show that the wrong ladder would not.
Recall Solution
B has 5 electrons per atom → 10 total. B is "nitrogen and below" → light ladder ( below ): After the 8 core/2s electrons, 2 electrons remain. On the light ladder the next level is the degenerate pair , so Hund's rule puts one electron in each → 2 unpaired → paramagnetic. ✅ Matches experiment. Bonding = ; antibonding = ; .
Wrong (heavy) ladder: the next level would be the single , so both electrons pair up there → , 0 unpaired → "diamagnetic." That contradicts reality — which is precisely how we know B₂ needs the flipped ladder.
L4.2
Compare O₂ with its ions O₂⁺ (superoxide's cousin, 15 e⁻) and O₂²⁻ (peroxide, 18 e⁻). For each give the bond order and predict the order of bond lengths.
Recall Solution
Start from O₂'s heavy-ladder valence filling and edit the level.
- O₂ (16 e⁻): → antibonding valence = 2 in . B.O. (from L3.2).
- O₂⁺ (15 e⁻): remove one electron → . Now , . . Removing an antibonding electron strengthens the bond.
- O₂²⁻ (18 e⁻): add two → . Now , . . Bond order: O₂⁺ (2.5) > O₂ (2) > O₂²⁻ (1). Bond length is the reverse: O₂⁺ < O₂ < O₂²⁻ (higher bond order → shorter bond).
Level 5 — Mastery
L5.1
A student claims: "C₂ has a double bond made of two σ bonds, because σ overlap is the strongest." Using MOT, find C₂'s (14... wait, count it) configuration, bond order, and the actual σ/π make-up of its bonds, then correct the student.
Recall Solution
Carbon has 6 electrons per atom → C₂ has 12 electrons. C is "nitrogen and below" → light ladder: After 8 electrons (), 4 electrons remain, and on the light ladder the next level is the degenerate pair — which holds exactly 4. So they fill both π orbitals completely, and stays empty. Bonding = ; antibonding = . Correction: the bond order is 2, so the student is right about "double bond" — but both bonds are π bonds, not σ! C₂'s double bond has no net σ contribution from (the is empty; the σ and σ* cancel). This is a rare, genuinely surprising MOT prediction. All electrons are paired → diamagnetic.
L5.2
Predict the magnetism of N₂⁺ (13 electrons) using the correct ladder, and give its bond order. Explain why its bond order is lower than N₂'s even though we only removed one electron.
Recall Solution
N₂ is diamagnetic with the top filled orbital (light ladder, L3.1). Removing one electron from N₂⁺ takes it from the highest occupied orbital, which is the bonding : Now one orbital () holds a lonely electron → 1 unpaired → paramagnetic. Bonding = ; antibonding = . Why lower than N₂'s 3? Because the electron we pulled out came from a bonding orbital (), so we removed glue → bond order drops from 3 to 2.5. (Contrast L4.2, where removing an antibonding electron raised the bond order.)
Recall One-glance answer table (reveal to self-check the whole page)
| Species | Electrons | Bond order | Unpaired e⁻ | Magnetism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H₂ | 2 | 1 | 0 | diamagnetic |
| He₂ | 4 | 0 | 0 | does not exist |
| He₂⁺ | 3 | 0.5 | 1 | paramagnetic |
| B₂ | 10 | 1 | 2 | paramagnetic |
| C₂ | 12 | 2 | 0 | diamagnetic (both π) |
| N₂ | 14 | 3 | 0 | diamagnetic |
| N₂⁺ | 13 | 2.5 | 1 | paramagnetic |
| O₂ | 16 | 2 | 2 | paramagnetic |
| O₂⁺ | 15 | 2.5 | 1 | paramagnetic |
| O₂²⁻ | 18 | 1 | 0 | diamagnetic |
| F₂ | 18 | 1 | 0 | diamagnetic |