This is an axial (thrust) load. The engine pushes at the base and all the mass above resists
being sped up, so the lower structure is pushed on from both ends → compressive.
What it looks like: imagine pressing a soda can down with your thumb — the walls carry a squeeze.
Recall Solution L1.2
(a) sideways gust → bending (the slender body flexes like a broomstick pushed in the middle).
(b) sound → dynamic (acoustics sub-family; pressure waves at frequencies).
(c) explosive bolt → dynamic (shock sub-family; a very short, sharp transient).
(d) steady thrust → axial (a slowly-varying, quasi-static push along the axis).
(i) Force.What: use Faxial=mng. Why: the term g+a (gravity plus
engine acceleration) is bundled into ng, so one number n carries both effects.
F=1500×5×9.81=7.358×104N.(ii) Stress.What:σ=F/A. Why: stress is force shared over the area that
actually carries it.
σ=0.0157.358×104=4.905×106Pa=4.9MPa (compressive).
Recall Solution L2.2
What: use fn=2π1k/m. Why this tool: set the driving force to zero and
the motion is simple harmonic; k/m is the angular frequency, and dividing by 2π
converts "radians per second" into "cycles per second" (Hz).
= \frac{632.46}{2\pi} = 100.6\ \text{Hz}.$$
See [[Modal Analysis & Natural Frequencies]] for how real parts have many such frequencies.
(i)What:I=πR3t for a thin ring. Why: nearly all the metal sits a distance R
from the centre-line, and I=∫y2dA rewards material placed far out. Look at figure s01 —
the wall is a thin band at radius R.
I=π(1.2)3(0.004)=π×1.728×0.004=0.021714m4.(ii)What: the outer fibre (c=R=1.2) feels the most stretch/squeeze. Why c=R:
the further from the neutral axis, the more a fibre is strained when the beam curves (figure s02).
σbend=0.0217146×105×1.2=3.316×107Pa=33.2MPa.
More on I in Beam Bending & Second Moment of Area.
Recall Solution L3.2
(i) Area of the thin ring.What:A=2πRt (circumference × wall). Why: unrolling the
thin tube gives a rectangle of length 2πR and height t.
A=2π(1.2)(0.004)=0.030159m2.(ii) Axial stress.σaxial=0.0301595×105=1.658×107Pa=16.6MPa.(iii) Total.What:add them. Why: at max-Q both loads squeeze the same fibre at the
same instant, so their stresses stack (figure s03).
σtotal=16.6+33.2=49.7MPa (compressive).
This is the worst-case sizing point — see Max-Q and Dynamic Pressure.
(i)Why this formula: at resonance the peak response is 1/(2ζ) times the static one;
low damping = high amplification.
Q=2(0.025)1=20.(ii)What Miles' equation does: it collapses the whole shaking spectrum into one RMS number
by integrating the sharp resonance peak; the π/2 comes from the area under that peak.
gRMS=2π×120×20×0.05=188.50=13.73g.(iii)Why 3σ: random peaks follow a bell curve; 3σ covers 99.7% of them, the
standard design envelope.
3σ=3×13.73=41.2g.
Background: Random Vibration & PSD and Factor of Safety & Margins of Safety.
Recall Solution L4.2
(i) Invert fn=2π1k/m → k=(2πfn)2m.
k1=(2π×90)2×8=(565.49)2×8=2.558×106N/m.(ii)k2=(2π×140)2×8=(879.65)2×8=6.190×106N/m.(iii)Why frequency scales with k:fn∝k, so to multiply fn by
140/90 you multiply k by that ratio squared.
k1k2=(90140)2=2.420.
So the bracket needs about 2.42× stiffer to clear the requirement.
= \frac{9.7120\times10^4}{0.033929} = 2.862\times10^6\ \text{Pa} = 2.86\ \text{MPa}.$$
**(ii) Bending.** $I = \pi R^3 t = \pi (0.9)^3 (0.006) = 0.013741\ \text{m}^4$, $c = R = 0.9$.
$$\sigma_\text{bend} = \frac{Mc}{I} = \frac{4.5\times10^5 \times 0.9}{0.013741}
= 2.948\times10^7\ \text{Pa} = 29.48\ \text{MPa}.$$
**(iii) Total.** Add on the compressive fibre:
$$\sigma_\text{total} = 2.86 + 29.48 = 32.34\ \text{MPa}.$$
**(iv) Margin.** *Why:* FoS inflates the demand; MoS tells you the spare capacity as a fraction.
$$\text{MoS} = \frac{300}{1.5 \times 32.34} - 1 = \frac{300}{48.51} - 1 = 6.184 - 1 = 5.18.$$
$\text{MoS} = +5.18 \ge 0$ → **passes comfortably** (huge margin from bending being the driver).
See [[Factor of Safety & Margins of Safety]].Recall Solution L5.2
(i)Q=1/(2ζ)=1/(2×0.02)=25.(ii)Why multiply: at resonance the response is Q times the static one.
σpeak=25×40=1000MPa.(iii)MoS=1.25×1000500−1=1250500−1=0.4−1=−0.6.MoS=−0.6<0 → FAILS. The "static" number looked safe (40 MPa vs 500 MPa yield),
but resonant amplification multiplied it 25× and blew straight past yield. This is exactly why
dynamic loads are analysed by frequency, not magnitude.
Recall One-line self-test
Why do axial and bending stresses add at max-Q but you never simply take the larger? ::: Because they load the same fibre at the same moment, so their stresses superpose: σtotal=F/A+Mc/I.