3.2.39 · D4Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics

Exercises — Launch window — phasing with target orbit

2,146 words10 min readBack to topic

Before we start, here is the one picture the whole page hangs on.

Figure — Launch window — phasing with target orbit

Read it like this: the chaser (blue) starts at perigee of the transfer ellipse and always sweeps exactly half a circle () to reach apogee. The target (yellow) is already ahead by the phase angle ; during the same time it drifts a smaller arc and lands right on the apogee point at the same instant the chaser arrives. The rule is just "the target had a head start of exactly the amount it will not cover."


Level 1 — Recognition

(Do you know which formula answers each question?)

L1.1

State, in words, what the number tells you and what its sign means.

Recall Solution

is the angular lead of the target over the chaser at the instant of the departure burn that guarantees rendezvous at the transfer's arrival point.

  • : target must be ahead of the chaser (in the direction of motion).
  • : target must be behind the chaser.
  • : they must be at the same angular position at launch. It is measured at the central body (Earth's centre), in radians.

L1.2

Which single quantity cancels in the phase-angle formula, and which quantities do it not cancel from?

Recall Solution

The gravitational parameter ==== cancels from (the angle is pure geometry — a ratio of radii). It does not cancel from the transfer time nor from the synodic period , because those measure how long things take, and time is set by the strength of gravity.

L1.3

For a Hohmann transfer, how many degrees does the chaser sweep, and why exactly that number?

Recall Solution

Exactly radians. The Hohmann transfer is half an ellipse — perigee to apogee — and perigee and apogee sit on opposite ends of the major axis, i.e. apart across the focus (Earth's centre).


Level 2 — Application

(Plug in numbers cleanly.)

L2.1

Chaser at km, target at km. Find the required phase angle in degrees.

Recall Solution

WHAT: compute the ratio, raise to , subtract from 1, multiply by . WHY positive: the target orbit is only slightly higher, so during transfer it covers just under (), leaving a small positive lead. ✅

L2.2

Compute the Hohmann transfer time for L2.1 (, km).

Recall Solution

, divide by : , square root s, times :

L2.3

Verify directly from for L2.1, and confirm .

Recall Solution

Target mean motion: rad/s. Then . ✅ Matches L2.1 — the closed formula and the direct time computation agree, because cancelled between them.


Level 3 — Analysis

(Interpret signs, limits, and geometry.)

L3.1

Chaser is higher than the target: km (GEO), km (LEO). Find and explain its sign.

Recall Solution

Reduce mod : rad ... but the physically meaningful statement is the raw value. WHY negative and huge: the inner LEO target is fast — during the long transfer it laps around many times (). So is a large negative number: the target must be far "behind" (equivalently, wraps around multiple times).

The honest interpretation: for an inner target you must add integer multiples of to place it in . Take : rad . So at launch the LEO target should sit essentially at the chaser's angular position (a hair ahead). The sign of the un-reduced still correctly encodes "target covers more than ." ✅

L3.2

Take the limit (target and chaser radii nearly equal). What does ? Interpret physically.

Recall Solution

As : , and , so Meaning: if the two orbits are (almost) the same, the transfer takes (almost) exactly half a period, during which the target covers (almost) exactly — the same the chaser covers. So there is nothing to lead: they must start at the same angular position. This is exactly the near-co-orbital ISS case, where phasing is razor-thin — see Rendezvous and Phasing Orbits.

L3.3

Show that if the target radius is much larger than the chaser's (), . Interpret.

Recall Solution

As , , and . So it does not reach — it saturates near . WHY: even for an infinitely far, infinitely slow target, the ratio floors at (perigee is negligible so ). The target still creeps forward a little during the (very long) transfer, so the lead maxes out around , not the full . The GEO example () is on the way to this ceiling.

Figure — Launch window — phasing with target orbit

Level 4 — Synthesis

(Combine phasing, transfer time, and synodic period.)

L4.1

Chaser at km (400 km altitude), target at km. (a) Find both mean motions. (b) Find the synodic period in days. (c) Comment on why single-Hohmann phasing is impractical here.

Recall Solution

(a) . ; ratio ; rad/s. ; ratio ; rad/s. (b) rad/s (chaser is faster, being lower). (c) The two orbits differ by only 20 km, so their differ by . The relative drift is tiny, so the one correct phasing repeats only every ~2 weeks. Waiting that long is unacceptable, so real missions use several phasing orbits to nudge the phase quickly instead. This is the Synodic Period speaking. ✅

L4.2

For the same two orbits in L4.1, find the required phase angle . Is it consistent with the near-co-orbital picture of L3.2?

Recall Solution

Yes — consistent with L3.2: nearly-equal radii give an almost-zero lead. The target need only sit about ahead. Combined with L4.1's 14.5-day synodic period, this shows why the whole window is so restrictive here. ✅

L4.3

A chaser at km must reach a target at km (a GPS-like orbit). Find (a) , (b) transfer time in hours, (c) phase angle in degrees.

Recall Solution

(a) km. (b) . ; ; s; s h. (c) ; ; rad . Interpretation: during the ~3-hour transfer, the GPS target only moves , so it must start ahead. Sits neatly between the LEO () and GEO () parent examples. ✅


Level 5 — Mastery

(Full mission-planning chains and derivations.)

L5.1

Derive the synodic-period formula from first principles, stating each step's WHAT/WHY.

Recall Solution

WHAT: define the relative angle , the target's lead over the chaser. WHY: the phasing geometry is entirely captured by ; a launch window recurs when returns to the same value. Each body's angle grows linearly: (constant mean motion on a circle). So WHAT: the geometry repeats when has advanced by a full : WHY the : whichever body is faster, the magnitude of one relative revolution is . Solving: This ties directly to Mean Motion and Orbital Period — mean motion is exactly the constant slope used here.

L5.2

A full LEO→GEO plan. km, km. Find: (a) ; (b) transfer time (hours); (c) synodic period (hours); (d) if you miss a window, how long until the next.

Recall Solution

(a) ; ; rad . (Matches parent Example 2.) (b) km; . s h. (c) rad/s (from ); rad/s (from ). ; s h. (d) Miss the window ⇒ wait one synodic period h for the same phasing to return (ignoring the separate ground-track/plane condition). ✅ WHY is short here: the two mean motions are very different (LEO fast, GEO slow), so the relative drift is large ⇒ the geometry recycles quickly — the opposite of the ISS case in L4.1.

L5.3

Ceiling proof. Prove that for an outer target (), the required phase angle satisfies .

Recall Solution

Let . Then As ranges over , the quantity decreases monotonically from (at ) down to (as ). So the ratio lives in . Raising to (an increasing function on positive reals) keeps the ordering, giving the bracket value in . Therefore Interpretation: confirms L3.3 — outer targets always need a positive lead, but never more than . The whole outer-transfer world is squeezed into that band, which the figure above illustrates.


Recall One-line self-check on the whole page

Can you state, from memory, the three master formulas and what each ignores or keeps ? (no ) ::: — pure geometry. (keeps ) ::: , . (keeps via ) ::: , .