3.2.28 · D4Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics

Exercises — Lambert's problem — connecting two positions in given time

2,257 words10 min readBack to topic

Unless stated otherwise we use canonical units where (distances in some unit, times chosen so gravity is normalized). This keeps the arithmetic clean while the structure stays identical to real SI problems.

Quick reminders of the tools we lean on (all from the parent note):

Figure — Lambert's problem — connecting two positions in given time

The picture above is the "space triangle" we keep returning to: the central body at the focus, the two position vectors as sides, and the red chord as the third side. Every scalar in the kit lives on this triangle.


Level 1 — Recognition

Exercise 1.1 (L1)

For a Lambert problem, which of these three quantities does the transfer time depend on, according to Lambert's theorem? (a) the eccentricity by itself, (b) , (c) the chord , (d) the semi-major axis , (e) the individual shape of the arc.

Recall Solution

Lambert's theorem says the time depends on exactly three scalars: , , and . So the correct set is (b), (c), (d). The eccentricity by itself (a) and the arc's individual shape (e) do not enter — that is the whole miracle: cancels out of the time law.

Exercise 1.2 (L1)

Given , , and transfer angle , compute the chord and the semiperimeter .

Recall Solution

Chord. , so Semiperimeter.


Level 2 — Application

Exercise 2.1 (L2)

Same geometry as 1.2 (, , , so , ). Find the minimum-energy semi-major axis , and evaluate the auxiliary angles at .

Recall Solution

At , the ratio , so For : , so So at the minimum-energy ellipse, exactly — this is the landmark from the parent note.

Exercise 2.2 (L2)

Using from 2.1, compute the minimum-energy time of flight (short way, ).

Recall Solution

Plug into Lambert's law with , :

  • Bracket:

This is the fastest the minimum-energy ellipse flies this arc. Any other feasible transfer uses a larger .


Level 3 — Analysis

Exercise 3.1 (L3)

For the geometry of 2.1, a mission requires (canonical units, short way, ). Since , a valid ellipse with exists. Using one Newton step starting from , estimate the required . (Define ; you may estimate numerically.)

Recall Solution

We need the root of . At : Lambert time , so . Numerical slope. Take a nearby point :

  • .
  • .
  • Bracket ; ; time .
  • .

Wait — the time decreased as grew! This is the non-monotonic behavior warned about in the parent note. On this branch (the one continuing smoothly from with increasing past ), moving up in this range moves the time the "wrong" way. The Newton slope here is Newton step: This pushes below — which is infeasible (). The lesson: near the wrong branch of makes naive Newton diverge. The correct increasing-time branch requires taking (the second branch past ), which we explore next.

Exercise 3.2 (L3)

Explain, using the constraint , why two different values correspond to each , and what physically distinguishes them.

Recall Solution

For a fixed , the number satisfies . The equation has two solutions for in : giving (the "" branch) or (the "" branch).

  • branch: the swept eccentric-anomaly arc is small → shorter time.
  • branch: the arc wraps the far side → longer time.

Physically these are two genuinely different ellipses (focus on opposite sides of the chord relative to the swept region) that both connect with the same . At exactly the two branches merge at . This is why "one time → one orbit" is false, and why a solver must know which branch it wants before iterating.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Exercise 4.1 (L4)

Same , , but now fly the long way, . (i) Show the chord is unchanged. (ii) State how Lambert's equation is modified. (iii) At , compute the long-way minimum-energy time and compare it to the short-way value from 2.2.

Recall Solution

(i) Chord. , identical to , so Same chord, same , same . The chord is symmetric in going around either way — only the arc differs. (ii) Modification. For the long way we flip the sign of : use , so the bracket becomes (iii) Long-way min-energy time. With and (from 2.1):

  • .
  • .
  • Bracket .
  • : .

Comparison: short way gave , long way gives . The long way is slower at the same — sensible, since it sweeps a bigger arc. The sign of is exactly what encodes this difference.

Exercise 4.2 (L4)

A Hohmann Transfer between two coplanar circular orbits is a special Lambert case with . For , , : (i) find the Hohmann transfer ellipse's semi-major axis directly, and (ii) confirm it satisfies the Lambert geometry (, , and that ).

Recall Solution

(i) Hohmann . A Hohmann ellipse touches both circles, so its major axis is : (ii) Geometry at . : This is just — makes sense, the two points are diametrically opposite so the chord is the whole diameter. So : the Hohmann transfer is exactly the minimum-energy Lambert solution for a half-revolution between these radii. This is the beautiful unification — Hohmann is not a separate theory, it's the , corner of Lambert.


Level 5 — Mastery

Exercise 5.1 (L5)

For the short-way geometry (, , ), a rendezvous requires exactly the minimum-energy time. (i) What is ? (ii) How many distinct zero-revolution solutions exist for this , and why? (iii) What does this tell a mission planner about robustness of the launch window here? (Link to Porkchop Plots and Launch Windows.)

Recall Solution

(i) . Since , the only ellipse achieving it is . (ii) Number of solutions. For there are two branches (short-time and long-time ). But at the two branches have merged into one — this is the tangent bottom of the time-vs- curve. So there is exactly one zero-rev short-way solution. (iii) Planner insight. A merged (double) root means the solution is a minimum of the curve: there. Small changes in the required move only slightly, but it's a knife-edge — you cannot fly faster than on any ellipse of this geometry at all. In a porkchop plot this shows up as the boundary of the feasible region: below the minimum-energy contour there is simply no solution. Planners keep comfortably above to keep two branches (hence flexibility) available.

Exercise 5.2 (L5)

A spacecraft must intercept a target with (short way, geometry of 2.1). Determine the required to 3 significant figures, and identify which branch ( or ). Show your bracketing logic. (This is a full targeting micro-problem.)

Recall Solution

Bracket. , so a solution exists with . Because exceeds the minimum time, we want the long-time behavior — the branch, where increasing the arc lengthens the flight. On the branch we use . Trial :

  • .
  • .
  • ; .
  • Bracket ; ; time . Too big.

Trial :

  • .
  • .
  • ; .
  • Bracket ; ; time . Slightly small.

Target lies between (time ) and (time ). Interpolating: Refine at :

  • .
  • .
  • ; .
  • Bracket ; ; time . Very close to .

One more nudge downward gives . To 3 sig figs, on the (long-time) branch.


Related: Kepler's Equation and Time of Flight, Lagrange Coefficients (f and g functions), Universal Variable Formulation.