This page is the drill floor for the critical-angle idea . The parent note built the one formula we need:
Before we drill, let us list every kind of question this one formula can be dressed up as. If we solve one example per row, nothing on an exam can surprise us.
Every critical-angle problem is really a rearrangement of sin θ c = n 2 / n 1 . There are only three "unknowns" you can be asked for, plus a set of edge cases where the formula behaves strangely. Here is the full map:
#
Case class
What is given
What is asked
Which cell
1
Standard forward
n 1 , n 2 (dense→rare)
θ c
forward, two real media
2
Against air
n 1 , air
θ c
forward, n 2 = 1
3
Inverse
θ c , air
n 1
solve for index
4
Two-media inverse
θ c , one index
other index
solve for index
5
Degenerate: equal indices
n 1 = n 2
θ c
limiting value θ c = 90°
6
Impossible: rarer→denser
n 1 < n 2
θ c ?
no solution case
7
Beyond critical
n 1 , n 2 , θ 1 > θ c
what happens?
sign/regime test
8
Word problem
fibre / underwater
θ c + meaning
real-world
9
Exam twist
prism / 45° geometry
does TIR occur?
compare-to-45°
We now hit every cell .
Worked example Example 1 — Cell 1: standard forward, two real media
Light travels from a dense plastic (n 1 = 1.60 ) into oil (n 2 = 1.40 ). Find θ c .
Forecast: the two indices are close, so the ray barely bends — guess: is θ c closer to 90° or to 30° ?
Check direction: n 1 = 1.60 > n 2 = 1.40 , dense→rare. ✅ TIR is possible.
Why this step? If the light went the other way, no critical angle exists at all (Cell 6). Always verify direction first.
Apply the formula: sin θ c = n 1 n 2 = 1.60 1.40 = 0.875 .
Why this step? This is the definition — set the refracted angle to 90° and solve, as in Snell's Law .
Invert the sine: θ c = sin − 1 ( 0.875 ) = 61.0° .
Why this step? We know the sine of the angle; sin − 1 is the operation that undoes "sine of" and hands back the angle.
Verify: the indices are close (ratio near 1), so θ c should be near 90° — and 61° is indeed steep. Forecast confirmed. Plug back: sin 61.0° = 0.875 = 1.40/1.60 . ✅
Worked example Example 2 — Cell 2: forward against air
A diamond has n 1 = 2.42 . It sits in air (n 2 = 1 ). Find θ c .
Forecast: diamond has a huge index. Big index → will θ c be large or small?
sin θ c = n 1 n 2 = 2.42 1 = 0.4132 .
Why this step? Against air, n 2 = 1 , so the formula collapses to sin θ c = 1/ n 1 .
θ c = sin − 1 ( 0.4132 ) = 24.4° .
Why this step? Undo the sine to read off the angle.
Verify: a tiny critical angle means almost any ray inside gets trapped — this is exactly why cut diamonds sparkle so much (light bounces many times before escaping). Sanity: sin 24.4° = 0.413 . ✅
Worked example Example 3 — Cell 3: inverse, find index from
θ c (against air)
A mystery liquid, measured against air, has θ c = 45.0° . Find its refractive index n .
Forecast: 45° is a "middling" critical angle. Will n come out near 1 (like air) or near 2 (like glass)?
Write the air formula: sin θ c = n 1 .
Why this step? Against air n 2 = 1 , and the denser medium is the liquid, n 1 = n .
Rearrange for n : n = sin θ c 1 = sin 45° 1 = 0.7071 1 .
Why this step? We want n alone, so flip both sides.
n = 1.414 .
Why this step? This is 2 — a clean numeric value.
Verify: n = 1.414 lies between water (1.33 ) and glass (1.5 ), a physically reasonable liquid. Plug back: sin θ c = 1/1.414 = 0.707 = sin 45° . ✅
Worked example Example 4 — Cell 4: two-media inverse
Light goes from glass (n 1 = 1.50 ) into an unknown coating. The critical angle at that boundary is θ c = 60.0° . Find the coating's index n 2 .
Forecast: a coating for TIR must be rarer than glass, so guess: is n 2 above or below 1.50 ?
Start from sin θ c = n 1 n 2 .
Why this step? Both media are real (neither is air), so keep the full two-index form.
Solve for n 2 : n 2 = n 1 sin θ c = 1.50 × sin 60° = 1.50 × 0.8660 .
Why this step? Multiply both sides by n 1 to isolate the unknown index.
n 2 = 1.299 ≈ 1.30 .
Why this step? Arithmetic.
Verify: 1.30 < 1.50 , so the coating is genuinely rarer — TIR is possible, consistent with there being a critical angle. ✅
Worked example Example 5 — Cell 5: degenerate, equal indices
Two media both have n = 1.50 (they are optically identical). What is θ c ?
Forecast: if the media are identical, is there even a boundary that bends light? What angle would "trap" light?
sin θ c = n 1 n 2 = 1.50 1.50 = 1 .
Why this step? Plug in equal indices — the ratio is exactly 1 .
θ c = sin − 1 ( 1 ) = 90° .
Why this step? The only angle whose sine equals 1 is 90° .
Verify: θ c = 90° means the "critical" angle is grazing incidence — you can only trap light if it runs exactly flat along the surface, i.e. effectively never . This is correct: with no index difference there is no bending (see Refraction of Light ), so TIR cannot occur. The formula gracefully reports the limiting value 90° . ✅
Worked example Example 6 — Cell 6: the impossible direction (rarer → denser)
Light travels from air (n 1 = 1.00 ) into glass (n 2 = 1.50 ). Someone asks for the critical angle. Find it — or explain why you cannot.
Forecast: the light is going into the denser medium. Does TIR even make sense here?
Blindly apply the formula: sin θ c = n 1 n 2 = 1.00 1.50 = 1.50 .
Why this step? To expose the contradiction, we let the formula speak.
Ask: can sin θ c = 1.50 ? No. Sine of any real angle lives in [ − 1 , 1 ] .
Why this step? sin θ c = 1.5 has no real solution — geometrically, no such angle exists.
Conclude: there is no critical angle going rarer→denser. TIR is impossible in this direction.
Why this step? Refraction into the denser medium always succeeds (the ray bends toward the normal), so the light never gets "trapped."
Verify: this matches the parent note's first condition — TIR needs n 1 > n 2 . Here n 1 < n 2 , so the machinery correctly refuses. ✅
Worked example Example 7 — Cell 7: beyond the critical angle
Inside water (n 1 = 1.33 , air n 2 = 1 ) a ray strikes the surface at θ 1 = 60° . First find θ c , then decide what happens to this ray.
Forecast: is 60° above or below the critical angle for water? What does the ray do?
Critical angle: sin θ c = 1.33 1 = 0.7519 ⇒ θ c = 48.8° .
Why this step? We need the threshold before we can compare.
Compare: θ 1 = 60° > 48.8° = θ c .
Why this step? The regime is decided by whether we are above or below θ c .
Since θ 1 > θ c , Snell would need sin θ 2 = n 2 n 1 sin θ 1 = 1.33 × sin 60° = 1.33 × 0.8660 = 1.152 > 1 .
Why this step? Checking Snell's demand shows it asks the impossible.
No refracted ray exists → total internal reflection : 100% of the light bounces back into the water.
Why this step? Energy must go somewhere; with refraction forbidden, reflection takes all of it.
Verify: sin θ 2 = 1.152 > 1 confirms impossibility, and 60° > 48.8° confirms we're past threshold. Both tests agree. ✅
Worked example Example 8 — Cell 8: real-world word problem (optical fibre)
An optical fibre core has n 1 = 1.50 , surrounded by cladding n 2 = 1.45 . Light bouncing along the core hits the core–cladding wall. Find θ c , and state the range of angles that stay trapped.
Forecast: the two indices are very close. Will the trapping angle be near 90° (a narrow trap) or near 0° ?
Direction check: 1.50 > 1.45 , dense→rare. ✅
Why this step? Fibres deliberately put the denser glass in the core so light can be trapped.
sin θ c = 1.50 1.45 = 0.9667 .
Why this step? Rarer (cladding) over denser (core).
θ c = sin − 1 ( 0.9667 ) = 75.2° .
Why this step? Undo the sine.
Trapped range: any wall-strike with θ 1 between 75.2° and 90° undergoes TIR.
Why this step? All incidence angles above θ c (up to grazing) are totally reflected.
Verify: the close indices give a large θ c near 90° , meaning light must travel nearly parallel to the fibre axis to stay in — exactly why fibres are engineered with tiny index differences and light is launched at shallow angles. ✅
Worked example Example 9 — Cell 9: exam twist (45° prism)
A right-angled glass prism (n = 1.50 , air outside) is used as a mirror: light hits the slanted face at exactly 45° . Does it undergo TIR? (This is the periscope prism trick.)
Forecast: the incidence is fixed at 45° . We must compare it to θ c — will 45° win?
Find θ c for glass–air: sin θ c = 1.50 1 = 0.6667 ⇒ θ c = 41.8° .
Why this step? The threshold is what 45° must beat.
Compare: 45° > 41.8° = θ c .
Why this step? TIR happens precisely when incidence exceeds the critical angle.
Conclusion: yes — the light is totally internally reflected , so the prism acts as a perfect mirror with no silvering needed.
Why this step? Since 45° clears the threshold, all energy reflects.
Verify: 45° − 41.8° = 3.2° of margin — TIR occurs, but only just . If the glass were low-index (n < 1/ sin 45° = 1.414 ), θ c would exceed 45° and the trick would fail. Our n = 1.50 > 1.414 , so we are safely above. ✅
Recall Rapid-fire self-test (cover the answers)
Glass n = 1.5 into air, θ c ? ::: sin − 1 ( 1/1.5 ) ≈ 41.8° .
Diamond n = 2.42 into air, θ c ? ::: sin − 1 ( 1/2.42 ) ≈ 24.4° .
Liquid with θ c = 45° against air, its n ? ::: 1/ sin 45° = 1.414 .
Equal indices n 1 = n 2 , θ c ? ::: 90° (no real trapping).
Air into glass, θ c ? ::: none exists — wrong direction, sin θ c = 1.5 > 1 .
Fibre core 1.50 , cladding 1.45 , θ c ? ::: sin − 1 ( 1.45/1.50 ) ≈ 75.2° .
Mnemonic One sentence to carry it all
"Direction first, formula second, compare to threshold third." Confirm dense→rare, compute sin θ c = n rarer / n denser , then ask whether the actual incidence beats θ c .