This page assumes nothing. Every letter that appears in the parent note gets built here, brick by brick, before you are allowed to use it. If you can count and read a graph, you can follow line one.
Before any energy, there are three state variables — numbers that describe what condition the system is in right now, not how it got there.
Figure s01 — the three dials. A gas box (black outline) holds particles (teal dots) each carrying a jiggle arrow (orange) whose length is temperature T. The plum arrows on the right wall are the outward push P; the double arrow beneath is the room V. Why we need this picture: the phrase "at constant P" in Gibbs–Helmholtz only makes sense once you can see P as one independent dial you can freeze while turning the T dial.
Why the topic needs these: Gibbs–Helmholtz is stated "at constant P". That phrase is meaningless unless you know P is a dial we can hold fixed while we change T. The little subscript P in (∂T∂⋅)P literally means "keep P frozen."
At constant pressure, the change ΔH (the symbol Δ, "delta," just means final minus initial, i.e. how much something changed) equals the heat that flows in or out. That is why chemists love H: it is measurable with a thermometer.
Why the topic needs it:H is the prize. Gibbs–Helmholtz exists to extract ΔH. See Enthalpy.
The combination TS has units of energy. Picture it as a "disorder tax": the hotter it is (T large), the more each unit of disorder S costs you in energy. This product TS is the villain we will make disappear.
Why the topic needs it:S is the term we want to cancel. The whole "divide by T" trick exists to make the TS part vanish. See Entropy.
Figure s02 — G is what's left after the tax. Each orange bar is the full heat energy H; the hatched plum cap on top is the disorder tax TS, and it grows taller as T climbs left→right. The teal line marks what survives, G=H−TS. Why we need this picture: it shows in one glance why merely watching G shrink as T rises tells you about the tax, not the heat H — the exact confusion Gibbs–Helmholtz is built to dodge.
Why the topic needs it:G is the quantity we measure (via equilibrium — see below) and the quantity we differentiate. See Gibbs free energy.
Why the topic needs it: the parent note's twin equation (∂(1/T)∂(A/T))V=U is the exact mirror of the G version. Learn one, get the other free. See Helmholtz free energy.
The parent note assertsdG=−SdT+VdP. Let us actually build it, so no step is a magic trick.
Step A — differentiate H=U+PV. Using the product rule on PV:
dH=dU+PdV+VdP.
Substitute dU=TdS−PdV; the −PdV and +PdV cancel:
dH=TdS+VdP.
Step B — differentiate G=H−TS. Again the product rule on TS:
dG=dH−TdS−SdT.
Substitute dH=TdS+VdP; the +TdS and −TdS cancel:
dG=−SdT+VdP
Why this step? Now we have earned the parent's fundamental relation instead of quoting it. Reading off the coefficient of dT at constant P (dP=0) gives the identity the whole derivation hinges on:
(∂T∂G)P=−S.
Why the topic needs it: the derivative is about rates of change, and d is the alphabet of change.
This is the single most-used piece of notation in the parent note, so we build it fully.
Figure s03 — a partial derivative is one directional slope. The teal curve is G as a function of T with P held fixed; the dashed orange line is its tangent (its steepness) at the plum dot. That steepness is(∂T∂G)P=−S, and it is negative because G slopes downward as T rises. Why we need this picture: it converts the abstract symbol ∂G/∂T into something you can literally see — the tilt of a tangent line.
Why the topic needs it: the entire equation is a statement about slopes, e.g. (∂T∂G)P=−S. Without partials there is no Gibbs–Helmholtz.
The parent note differentiates G/T, not G. To do that you need one calculus tool, and we will run it all the way to the punchline.
Substitute f=G and g=T. Since ∂T∂g=∂T∂T=1:
(∂T∂TG)P=T2T(∂T∂G)P−G⋅1=T2T(∂T∂G)P−G.
Now show the numerator is −H. Start from the definition G=H−TS and the slope we earned in §5:
(∂T∂G)P=−S⟹S=−(∂T∂G)P.
Put that S back into G=H−TS:
G=H−T[−(∂T∂G)P]=H+T(∂T∂G)P.
Rearrange for H:
H = G - T\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}\right)_P \tag{$\star$}
Multiply (⋆) by −1: the numerator of our quotient is exactly
T(∂T∂G)P−G=−[G−T∂TG]=−H.
The chain rule step, done explicitly. The chain rule says a slope in one variable converts to a slope in another by multiplying by the conversion factor:
(∂(1/T)∂(G/T))P=(∂T∂(G/T))P⋅∂(1/T)∂T.
We need ∂(1/T)∂T. Let u=1/T, so T=1/u and
∂u∂T=∂u∂(u1)=−u21=−T2.
Substitute both pieces:
(∂(1/T)∂(G/T))P=(−T2H)⋅(−T2)=H.
The two minus signs and the two T2's cancel exactly:
(∂(1/T)∂(G/T))P=H
Equivalently, in differential language d(1/T)=−T21dT, i.e. dT=−T2d(1/T) — the same −T2 factor that just cancelled the −1/T2.
Why the topic needs it: plotting ΔG/T against 1/T gives a straight line whose slope is ΔH. That is the practical payoff.