Exercises — Lorentz transformation — derivation
Throughout, is the lab frame and slides along the shared -axis at relative speed . The two master equations we lean on: Inverse (swap primes, flip the sign of ):
Level 1 — Recognition
L1.1 — Read off
Compute the Lorentz factor for .
Recall Solution
What: plug into . Why: is the single number that controls how much space and time stretch; every relativity problem starts here. Answer: .
L1.2 — Which term breaks Galileo?
In , name the one term that Newton's is missing, and say in words what it does.
Recall Solution
The extra piece is the term. What it does: it makes the time-shift depend on where the event happens (). Two events at different places but the same lab time get different primed times — this is the seed of Relativity of simultaneity. The overall is the second departure (it multiplies everything).
L1.3 — Sanity of the limit
For a walking person, m/s. Estimate and state what happens to .
Recall Solution
This is unimaginably tiny, so . Meaning: the Lorentz transform collapses back to Galileo, , . The new theory contains the old one — as any correct generalization must.
Level 2 — Application
L2.1 — Transform one event
An event has lab coordinates ls, s. Frame moves at . Find and . (Use ls/s, .)
Recall Solution
What: substitute into both master equations. Why the numbers: s because . Answer: . The event is behind the moving origin () and happens later in .
L2.2 — Time dilation from the transform
A clock sits at rest at in and ticks off s of its own time. How much lab time passes ()?
Recall Solution
What: the clock is at the moving origin, so use the inverse time equation with : Why matters: Time dilation compares the same clock's ticks; that clock is stationary in , so its position never changes there. Answer: s. The lab sees the moving clock tick slowly (more lab time per tick).
L2.3 — Length contraction from the transform
A rod at rest in has proper length ls. The lab measures both ends at the same lab time. Find the lab length ().
Recall Solution
What: measuring length in the lab means noting both ends simultaneously in , so . Use as a difference: Why : if you noted the ends at different times the moving rod would have shifted, corrupting the measurement. Answer: ls (contracted). See Length contraction.
Level 3 — Analysis
L3.1 — Relativity of simultaneity
Two firecrackers explode in simultaneously () at and ls. In (), which explodes first, and by how much?
Recall Solution
What: transform each event's time. Reading it: s is earlier than , so in the far explosion (event 2) happens first, by s. Why: the term punishes larger with a bigger negative time-shift — simultaneity is not absolute. See Relativity of simultaneity. Look at the tilted line of simultaneity in the figure below.

L3.2 — The invariant interval
For the two events in L3.1, compute the spacetime interval in both frames and confirm they match.
Recall Solution
In : , ls. With : In : from L3.1, s. And ls. Answer: both give . Why it's negative: a negative means the events are space-like separated — no signal can connect them, which is exactly why their time-order can flip between frames. See Spacetime interval.
L3.3 — Velocity addition
Inside a ball moves at in the direction. moves at relative to the lab. What is the ball's speed in the lab?
Recall Solution
What: use the relativistic addition rule (the inverse form, adding ): Why not : naive addition would exceed ! The denominator tames it. Answer: , still below .
Level 4 — Synthesis
L4.1 — Muon survival
A muon is created high in the atmosphere and lives in its own rest frame. It travels toward the ground at . How far does it travel in the lab frame before decaying? Compare to the naive (no-relativity) distance .
Recall Solution
What: the muon's lifetime is a proper time (measured on its own clock, ). The lab sees it dilated: Lab distance: Naive distance (ignoring dilation): m. Why the difference: without time dilation the muon "shouldn't" reach the ground; the factor lets it travel farther. This is a real observed effect. Answer: km (vs km naive).
L4.2 — Two-step chain from the raw transform
Event : ls, s in lab. First go to frame at , getting . Then from go to frame at (measured relative to ). Find two ways: (a) chaining, (b) a single boost at the combined velocity from velocity addition. Show they agree.
Recall Solution
Step 1 (): Step 2 (same , applied to primed coords): (b) Combined velocity: Single boost from lab directly: Answer: both routes give . Why: Lorentz boosts along one axis form a group — two in a row equal one bigger boost, whose speed is set by velocity addition (not !).
Level 5 — Mastery
L5.1 — Derive velocity addition from scratch
Starting only from and , derive where and .
Recall Solution
What: velocity is a ratio of differentials, so take differentials of both transforms. Why differentials: by definition, and the 's will cancel in the ratio — that's the elegance. Now divide top and bottom by (so appears): Check: set : . Light stays at .
L5.2 — Prove the interval is invariant
Show algebraically that for the boost (take ).
Recall Solution
What: substitute the transforms and expand. Subtract — the cross terms cancel (that's why the interval survives): Group by and : Final blow: by definition of , leaving This invariance is the geometric heart of the Minkowski diagram and Spacetime interval.
L5.3 — The high-speed limit of a train paradox
A train of proper length m tears through a station at . (a) How long does the station platform measure it? (b) A door at the front and a door at the back of the train are, in the train's frame, opened simultaneously apart... wait — they open simultaneously in the train; how far apart in time does the platform see them open?
Recall Solution
(a) . (b) In the train frame the two doors open at the same time , separated by m. Transform to the platform with the inverse time equation: Plug numbers (, ): Answer: platform measures length m and sees the doors open apart — the front and back events, simultaneous on the train, are not simultaneous on the platform. This is the engine behind every "pole-in-barn" paradox.
Recall One-line summaries to self-test
for ? ::: Term that breaks Galilean simultaneity? ::: Condition for time dilation? ::: same clock, Condition for length contraction? ::: simultaneous in lab, Velocity of inside frame (lab)? ::: Interval is... ::: invariant across all inertial frames