Exercises — Compton scattering — wavelength shift derivation
Below, is the photon scattering angle (measured from its original direction), and is the electron recoil angle. Read the figure like a map before you start: it is the single picture every problem on this page refers back to.

Level 1 — Recognition
Recall Solution
- : the increase in wavelength (always ).
- : Planck's constant. : electron rest mass. : speed of light.
- : the angle the scattered photon makes with its incoming direction.
- .
Recall Solution
The factor controls everything.
- : , so → (photon passes straight through, transfers no momentum).
- : , so → maximum .
Level 2 — Application
Recall Solution
, so .
Recall Solution
, so . Note this is bigger than the shift ( pm) but smaller than the backscatter max ( pm), as it should be.
Recall Solution
Set , so , giving . This is why is the textbook "clean" angle — the shift equals exactly one Compton wavelength.
Level 3 — Analysis
Recall Solution
At , pm for both (the shift is independent of ).
- X-ray: — easily measurable.
- Visible: , so — utterly invisible. Conclusion: the shift is the same absolute size, but only matters relative to the wavelength. Short-wavelength X-rays make the fixed pm a big fraction, so the effect stands out.
Recall Solution
Energy conservation says the electron's kinetic energy equals whatever energy the photon lost. The photon's energy before is and after is (each just the photon energy ). So the energy handed to the electron is
= hc\left(\frac{1}{\lambda} - \frac{1}{\lambda'}\right).$$ Since $\lambda' > \lambda$, the bracket is positive — the photon truly lost energy. First $\lambda' = 50.0 + 2.43 = 52.43$ pm. Then $$KE = 1.240\times10^{6}\left(\frac{1}{50.0} - \frac{1}{52.43}\right) = 1.240\times10^{6}(0.0200000 - 0.0190730)$$ $$= 1.240\times10^{6} \times 9.270\times10^{-4} \approx 1.149\times10^{3}\text{ eV} \approx 1.15\text{ keV}.$$Level 4 — Synthesis
Recall Solution
Convert energy to wavelength: pm. Shift at : pm, so pm. Back to energy: The electron therefore gained keV.
Recall Solution
First, the symbol: == is the magnitude of the recoil electron's momentum vector == — a single positive number (in the same units as ), pointing along the blue arrow at angle below the -axis in Figure s01.
Now build the two momentum equations by decomposing every arrow onto the axes. Momentum is a vector, so the -total and the -total are each conserved separately.
- Before: only the incoming photon moves — momentum purely along , and along (the electron is at rest).
- After: the scattered photon has momentum at angle , so its components are (along ) and (along ). The electron has momentum at angle , so its components are (along ) and (along , i.e. downward).
Setting before after in each direction and isolating the electron's terms:
\qquad \underbrace{p_e\sin\phi = \frac{h}{\lambda'}\sin\theta}_{y\text{-momentum}}.$$ The $y$ equation says the electron's downward kick exactly matches the photon's upward kick — the cancellation we spotted in the figure. Divide the second by the first (the common factor $h$ cancels; work in units of $1/\text{pm}$): $$\tan\phi = \frac{\dfrac{1}{\lambda'}\sin\theta}{\dfrac{1}{\lambda} - \dfrac{1}{\lambda'}\cos\theta}.$$ With $\theta=90^\circ$ ($\sin=1,\ \cos=0$): $$\tan\phi = \frac{1/\lambda'}{1/\lambda} = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda'} = \frac{12.40}{14.83} = 0.8362.$$ $$\phi = \arctan(0.8362) \approx 39.9^\circ.$$ The electron recoils forward-and-sideways, opposite the photon's sideways kick — exactly what conservation of the $y$-momentum demands.Level 5 — Mastery
Recall Solution
The derivation never assumed the recoiling mass was the electron's — it just called it . So the same formula holds with the recoiling mass in place of : To reuse the number we already know, factor the electron's Compton wavelength out. Since
= \frac{\lambda_C}{M/m_e},$$ a heavier mass simply *divides down* the electron shift by the mass ratio $M/m_e$. With $M/m_e = 22032$ and $(1-\cos 180^\circ)=2$: $$\Delta\lambda = \frac{2.43}{22032}\times 2 = 2.206\times10^{-4}\text{ pm} \approx 2.2\times10^{-4}\text{ pm}.$$ This is about $22000$ times smaller than the free-electron shift — experimentally indistinguishable from **zero**. So photons that bounce off tightly-bound electrons appear at the *original* wavelength: this is the ==unshifted peak== that sits alongside the shifted peak in real spectra.Recall Solution
Fractional energy lost by the photon:
= \frac{\lambda'-\lambda}{\lambda'} = \frac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda + \Delta\lambda}.$$ This grows with $\Delta\lambda$, which is largest at $\theta = 180^\circ$ ($\Delta\lambda = 2\lambda_C$). So backscatter gives the maximum energy transfer. For $\lambda = 2.43$ pm $= \lambda_C$: $$\Delta\lambda = 2\lambda_C = 4.86\text{ pm}, \qquad \lambda' = 2.43 + 4.86 = 7.29\text{ pm}.$$ $$\frac{\Delta E}{E} = \frac{4.86}{7.29} = 0.6667 = 66.7\%.$$ Two-thirds of this photon's energy is handed to the electron in a head-on backscatter.Recall Solution
(a) : so — a grazing (undeflected) photon transfers no momentum, keeps its wavelength. ✔ (b) : , so pm exactly. ✔ (c) For all , , so . Since , we get : the scattered wavelength is never shorter than the incoming one. A photon can only lose energy to a resting electron, never gain it — that would violate energy conservation. ✔
Connections
- Photon momentum and energy — every problem uses and .
- Conservation of energy and Conservation of momentum — the twin laws behind L4.
- Relativistic energy-momentum relation — why the recoil electron obeys .
- X-ray production and Bremsstrahlung — where these X-rays come from before they scatter.
- Parent: the full derivation.