Apply one test each time: is there a net external torque about this axis?
(a) Conserved. The muscular pull is internal; ice is frictionless so no external twist. L fixed. ✅
(b) NOT conserved. The child's push is an external force applied off-axis → external torque → L grows. ❌
(c) Conserved. Gravity is a central force pointing straight at the Sun, so F∥r; by the cross-product zero-rule τ=r×F=0. L fixed — this is Kepler's 2nd law. ✅
(d) NOT conserved. Friction at the contact acts off-axis and opposes spin → external torque of the opposite sign to L → L decays toward zero. ❌
If the time-derivative of L is zero, then by dtdL=τext,net the net external torque is zero, and L is constant in both magnitude and direction (it is a fixed arrow in space).
Condition: frictionless, internal pull → L conserved about the spin axis (fixed vertical axis, so L=Iω applies). She spins one way throughout, so every term is positive and signs drop out.
I1ω1=I2ω2⇒ω2=38×1.5=4rad/s.
Kinetic energy (from the toolkit) KE=21Iω2. Since Iω is fixed, write KE=21(Iω)ω=21Lω, so KE∝ω:
KE1KE2=ω1ω2=1.54=38≈2.67.
Energy rose — her muscles did work. See Rotational kinetic energy.
Condition: gravity is parallel to the axis (no torque about it); impact is internal → L about the axis conserved. Disc and putty end up turning the same way → all terms positive.
Point-mass addition: mr2=0.4×0.62=0.144kg⋅m2.
Idω0=(Id+mr2)ωf⇒ωf=1.2+0.1441.2×6=1.3447.2≈5.36rad/s.
Gravity is central → F∥r → τ=r×F=0 → L=mvr conserved (at apsides v⊥r, so full vr counts). The orbit circulates one way, so both sides keep the same sign.
v1r1=v2r2⇒v2=5.454×0.6=6km/s.
Nine times farther → one-ninth the speed. Slow and far, fast and close: Kepler's 2nd law in numbers.
The figure below is the whole argument in one picture. Trace it with your finger as you read.
Recall Solution
Torque is τ=r×F, and its size is rFsinθ where θ is the angle between r and F.
Vertical axis (red weight arrow in the figure): the weight F=mg points straight down, parallel to the vertical axis. Any turn about that axis has its r lying flat, and the vertical component of r×F is zero because the force has no sideways push around the axis. Look at how the red arrow runs parallel to the gray axis arrow — parallel means sinθ=0 → zero vertical torque → vertical L conserved (condition 3: component-wise conservation).
Horizontal rim axis: now the same red weight arrow sits a horizontal distance out from that axis (the black r in the figure) and points perpendicular to it. Here θ=90∘, sinθ=1, so r×F=0 → there is a torque → L about the horizontal axis is not protected. Conservation is axis-by-axis, never automatically "about everything".
Condition: the friction that couples them is internal to the two-disc system; no external axial torque → L conserved. Both spin the same way (B starts at rest), so all terms are positive.
IAωA+IBωB=(IA+IB)ωf⇒ωf=62×9+0=3rad/s.KEi=21(2)(9)2=81J. KEf=21(6)(3)2=27J.
Fraction lost =8181−27=8154=32≈0.667. Two-thirds gone to friction heat — yet L is exactly conserved.
The figure below shows the two circles (before/after) and, crucially, the three arrows whose directions decide everything: r, the velocity v, and the string tension T. Compare the direction of T with r.
Recall Solution
Condition (read it off the figure): the red tension arrow T lies exactly along the black position arrow r (both point to the central hole). Parallel arrows → sinθ=0 → τ=r×T=0 → L=mvr conserved.
v1r1=v2r2⇒v2=0.43×0.8=6m/s.
The pull is radial so it exerts no torque, but as the puck spirals inward it moves toward the hole, i.e. along the tension, so the tension does work. Using the work–energy theorem W=ΔKE from the toolkit:
W=KE2−KE1=21(0.5)(62−32)=0.25×27=6.75J.L constant, energy increased by your pulling — the same lesson as the skater. (Notice in the figure that v is drawn perpendicular to r: that perpendicularity is what makes L=mvr with the full v.)
Origin choice: put the axis at the hinge. The hinge exerts a big unknown reaction force during impact, but that force acts at the hinge where r=0, so its torque r×F=0×F=0 — zero torque about the hinge. Gravity acts over the tiny collision time → negligible impulse-torque. Hence Labout the hinge is conserved (the "pick the smart origin" rule from the parent note).
Take the bullet's incoming swing sense as +. Bullet's incoming L=mvr=0.01×400×0.9=3.6kg⋅m2/s (positive).
After embedding, total I=Irod+mr2=1.6+0.01×0.92=1.6081kg⋅m2.
ω=IL=1.60813.6≈2.239rad/s.
Positive ω → the rod swings the same way the bullet was heading, as expected.
Linear momentum:not conserved — the hinge delivers an external horizontal force impulse. (See Conservation of linear momentum for why the hinge breaks it.)
Angular momentum about the hinge:conserved — hinge force has zero moment arm there.
Kinetic energy:not conserved — embedding is inelastic, ≈796J became heat.
This is the whole point of the topic: the three conservation questions have three independent answers, decided by three different conditions.
Inelastic spin collision — which quantity survives? ::: Angular momentum (Li=Lf); kinetic energy is lost.
Radial/central force does what to torque and to energy? ::: Zero torque (so L constant) but it can still do work (energy changes via W=ΔKE).
Why pick the axis at a hinge/pivot during impact? ::: The reaction force there has zero moment arm, so zero torque, so L about that axis is conserved.
Skater/puck speeds up — is energy conserved? ::: No; work is done by muscles/your pull. L is conserved, energy is not.
When is the cross product r×F zero? ::: When r and F are parallel (sinθ=0), i.e. a central force or a force applied at the axis.
How do you add two angular momenta on the same axis? ::: As signed numbers (right-hand rule): same sense adds, opposite sense subtracts.