Before we can prove that total stays frozen, we must know exactly what every scribble in the parent note means. Below, each symbol is built from nothing: plain words → a picture → why the topic needs it. Read top to bottom; every item leans on the one above it. The little "§" sign just means "the numbered section on this page" — e.g. "§8" points you to section 8 below.
Picture: a solid block sitting on a table, tagged with "m".
Why we need it: every energy formula (21mv2, mgh) is scaled by m — double the mass, double the energy at the same speed or height.
Picture: a stopwatch ticking beside the moving block.
Why we need it: velocity and acceleration are both "per second," so every rate of change is measured againstt. A tiny tick of the clock is written dt (a sliver of time, §3).
Picture: a number line; a dot at x, an arrow of length dx nudging it right — see the figure below.
Why we need it: work is force acting over a distance, so we must be able to talk about "a little bit of movement" dx and add up all the little bits.
The figure below fixes these three ideas — position x, a sliver dx, and how a sliver of distance over a sliver of time gives velocity — in one picture. Notice the yellow step dx nudging the blue dot rightward, and the green label reading off v=dx/dt.
Picture: the same dot on the number line, now with a speedometer needle attached.
Why we need it: the whole derivation starts from Newton's law F=mdtdv, so we must be fluent in "rate of change" before line one. The fraction dtdv is not two numbers divided — it is one idea: steepness of the speed-vs-time graph.
Picture: a block with several arrows on it (gravity down, hand pushing right); their sum is one bold Fnet arrow.
Note on notation: whenever a quantity has a direction (force F, displacement d, acceleration a, velocity v) we may put an arrow on it. Along a single straight line we often drop the arrow and keep just a sign (+ or −) to record the direction — that is all the "direction" a 1-D line has.
Why we need it: Newton's second law and work both start from force. We link which kind of force is acting to decide whether energy is conserved.
Picture: the moving block, a glowing halo whose brightness grows with speed.
Why we need it: it is one of the two pillars the whole proof stands on. It converts the abstract "work" (§7) into a concrete change in the motion-pocket K. Full statement and derivation live in Work-energy theorem.
Picture: many thin rectangles under a curve, their areas summed into one shaded region.
Why we need it: work over a real distance, and potential energy, are both sums of infinitely many tiny contributions. Without the integral we could only handle one sliver at a time.
Picture: a block sliding on rough ground, tiny heat-squiggles rising behind it.
Why we need it: the conservation law only holds when such forces do no net work. Naming this "sticky" energy-thief precisely is what lets us state the exact condition for the proof.
Read it top-down: time, mass and rate-of-change build Newton's law; force, displacement and integration build work; work gives the work–energy theorem; force + integration also build potential energy through F=−dU/dx; and the two "change" boxes collide (with friction absent) to give conservation.