This page is a complete tour of cases . The parent note built the three formulas. Here we make sure you never meet a situation you haven't already seen solved: every sign , every reference choice , the degenerate inputs (zero height, zero stretch, infinite distance), the limiting behaviours, a real-world word problem, and an exam-style twist .
First, the toolbox we are allowed to use (all three earned in the parent):
Every problem this topic can throw is one of these cells. The Example column tells you which worked case below covers it.
Cell
What varies
Trap / edge behaviour
Example
G1
Flat gravity, going up
Δ U > 0
(a)
G2
Flat gravity, going down / below origin
Δ U < 0 , h negative
(a)
G3
Full gravity, moving inward vs outward
U < 0 always, but Δ U sign flips
(b)
G4
Reference choice (h = 0 vs r = ∞ )
same physics, different U values
(c)
G5
Limiting: − GM m / r → m g h as h ≪ R
approximation, not equality
(d)
S1
Spring stretched (x > 0 )
U > 0
(e)
S2
Spring compressed (x < 0 )
U > 0 still, symmetry
(e)
S3
Spring degenerate (x = 0 )
U = 0 , force = 0
(e)
F1
Force from a general U ( x )
sign of − d U / d x , equilibria
(f)
W1
Real-world word problem (energy conservation)
multiple stores add up
(g)
X1
Exam twist (mixed spring + gravity, or graph)
which reference, don't double-count
(h)
Worked example (a) Flat gravity — up
and below the floor · cells G1, G2
A 2 kg box starts on a table at h = 0 . (i) It is lifted to h = + 1.5 m . (ii) From the table it is lowered into a pit to h = − 0.8 m . Find Δ U for each (g = 9.8 ).
Forecast: Guess the signs first. Up should store energy (+ ); dropping below the reference should give negative PE. Do the numbers agree?
Up: Δ U i = m g h = 2 × 9.8 × ( + 1.5 ) = + 29.4 J .
Why this step? Displacement is up, gravity is down → gravity does negative work → we bank positive energy.
Down: Δ U ii = m g h = 2 × 9.8 × ( − 0.8 ) = − 15.68 J .
Why this step? Below the reference h is negative . Nothing special happens to the formula — the sign of h carries the physics. PE below your chosen zero is genuinely negative.
Verify: Units: kg ⋅ ( m/s 2 ) ⋅ m = J . ✓ Case (i) positive, (ii) negative — matches the forecast. A box in a pit would speed up if released upward toward the table, consistent with lower PE at the bottom.
Worked example (b) Full gravity — inward vs outward · cell G3
Earth: GM = 3.986 × 1 0 14 m 3 / s 2 , radius R = 6.371 × 1 0 6 m . A 1000 kg satellite moves from r 1 = 7.0 × 1 0 6 m inward to r 2 = 6.6 × 1 0 6 m . Find Δ U .
Forecast: Both U values are negative (well). Moving inward means falling deeper → Δ U should be negative . Guess the magnitude: order 1 0 9 J ?
U ( r ) = − r GM m , so U 1 = − 7.0 × 1 0 6 3.986 × 1 0 14 × 1000 = − 5.694 × 1 0 10 J .
Why this step? Reference is infinity, so bound satellites have negative U .
U 2 = − 6.6 × 1 0 6 3.986 × 1 0 14 × 1000 = − 6.039 × 1 0 10 J .
Δ U = U 2 − U 1 = − 6.039 × 1 0 10 − ( − 5.694 × 1 0 10 ) = − 3.45 × 1 0 9 J .
Why this step? Deeper in the well = more negative = energy released (Δ U < 0 ), which becomes kinetic energy of the fall.
Verify: Δ U is negative ✓ (moved inward). Magnitude ∼ 3 × 1 0 9 J , matching the forecast. Both U values negative ✓.
Worked example (c) Same physics, two references · cell G4
Show that the change in PE from the surface to h = 100 km is identical whether you use m g h (reference at surface) or − GM m / r (reference at infinity). Use m = 1 kg , g = 9.8 , GM = 3.986 × 1 0 14 , R = 6.371 × 1 0 6 m , h = 1.0 × 1 0 5 m .
Forecast: The values of U differ wildly (one starts at 0, the other at a huge negative). But the difference Δ U must nearly match — only differences are physical.
Flat: Δ U flat = m g h = 1 × 9.8 × 1.0 × 1 0 5 = 9.80 × 1 0 5 J .
Full: Δ U full = − GM m ( R + h 1 − R 1 )
= − 3.986 × 1 0 14 ( 6.471 × 1 0 6 1 − 6.371 × 1 0 6 1 ) = 9.66 × 1 0 5 J .
Why this step? Absolute U depends on reference, but subtracting cancels the constant offset — the physical quantity survives.
Verify: 9.80 × 1 0 5 vs 9.66 × 1 0 5 — agree to ∼ 1.5% . ✓ The small gap is because g weakens slightly with altitude, which the flat formula ignores. This is the reconciliation the parent note promised, made numeric.
Worked example (d) The limiting case, made honest · cell G5
The parent note wrote − GM m / r ≈ m g h for small h . Quantify "small": at what height does the flat formula err by 1% ? Use R = 6.371 × 1 0 6 m .
Forecast: The error grows with h / R . A 1% error should need h around a few percent of R — tens to a hundred km.
Exact factor: full Δ U = m g h ⋅ R + h R (algebra of R 1 − R + h 1 = R ( R + h ) h , times GM m = g R 2 m ).
Why this step? Writing the exact result as (flat) × a correction factor R + h R isolates exactly how wrong the approximation is.
Fractional error = 1 − R + h R = R + h h . Set equal to 0.01 : h = 0.99 0.01 R = 6.44 × 1 0 4 m .
Why this step? Solving for the threshold turns "small" into a real number.
Verify: h ≈ 64 km — a few percent of R , matching the forecast. Below Everest (∼ 9 km) the error is under 0.15% , so m g h is excellent for everyday problems. ✓
Worked example (e) Spring — stretch, compress, and natural length · cells S1, S2, S3
A spring k = 200 N/m . Find U for (i) stretched x = + 0.10 m , (ii) compressed x = − 0.10 m , (iii) at natural length x = 0 . See figure.
Forecast: Since U = 2 1 k x 2 squares x , (i) and (ii) should give the same positive number, and (iii) exactly zero.
Stretched: U = 2 1 ( 200 ) ( 0.10 ) 2 = 1.0 J .
Compressed: U = 2 1 ( 200 ) ( − 0.10 ) 2 = 1.0 J .
Why this step? ( − 0.10 ) 2 = ( + 0.10 ) 2 . The parabola U ( x ) is symmetric — pushing in stores the same as pulling out (look at the blue curve, equal heights either side of x = 0 ).
Natural length: U = 2 1 ( 200 ) ( 0 ) 2 = 0 J ; force F = − k x = 0 .
Why this step? This is the degenerate input — the bottom of the well. Zero stored energy and zero force (flat tangent, orange arrow vanishes).
Verify: Symmetry (i)=(ii)=1.0 J ✓, degenerate (iii)=0 ✓. Units: ( N/m ) ⋅ m 2 = N⋅m = J ✓.
Worked example (f) Force from a general potential — finding equilibria · cell F1
A particle has U ( x ) = x 3 − 3 x (joules, x in metres). Find the force F ( x ) , and locate + classify the equilibrium points. See figure.
Forecast: Equilibria are where the landscape is flat (F = 0 ). A cubic U has a hill and a valley, so expect two equilibria — one stable (valley), one unstable (hill).
F = − d x d U = − ( 3 x 2 − 3 ) = 3 − 3 x 2 .
Why this step? Force is minus the slope of U — it points downhill.
Equilibria: F = 0 ⇒ 3 − 3 x 2 = 0 ⇒ x = ± 1 .
Why this step? No force means no slope — a resting configuration.
Classify with the shape of U : at x = − 1 , U = ( − 1 ) − 3 ( − 1 ) = 2 (a peak , unstable); at x = + 1 , U = 1 − 3 = − 2 (a valley , stable).
Why this step? A ball nudged from the peak rolls away (unstable); nudged from the valley it rolls back (stable). Look at the green valley vs red peak in the figure.
Verify: F ( ± 1 ) = 3 − 3 ( 1 ) = 0 ✓. U ( − 1 ) = 2 > U ( + 1 ) = − 2 , so x = + 1 is the lower (stable) point ✓, matching the forecast of one hill + one valley.
Worked example (g) Real-world word problem — three energy stores · cell W1
A 0.5 kg ball sits on a spring (k = 200 N/m ) compressed x = 0.10 m . Released, it flies straight up. Ignoring air, how high above the release point does it rise? (g = 9.8 )
Forecast: All the spring's stored energy becomes gravitational PE at the top (speed = 0 there). Expect a height of a few tens of centimetres.
Spring PE released: U s = 2 1 k x 2 = 2 1 ( 200 ) ( 0.10 ) 2 = 1.0 J .
Why this step? This is the total energy budget for the flight.
Energy conservation : at the highest point all of it is gravitational, m g h = 1.0 .
Why this step? No friction → the recoverable spring PE fully converts. At the peak KE = 0 .
h = m g 1.0 = 0.5 × 9.8 1.0 = 0.204 m .
Verify: h ≈ 0.20 m ✓ (tens of cm, as forecast). Units: J / ( kg ⋅ m/s 2 ) = m ✓. Subtlety: strictly the ball also rises by the compression 0.10 m while still on the spring; here h is measured from the release point, so we count only spring→gravity conversion.
Worked example (h) Exam twist — spring + gravity, no double-counting · cell X1
A 0.5 kg bead on a vertical spring (k = 200 N/m ) is pushed down, compressing it by x = 0.10 m below the natural length, then released. Find its speed at the instant it passes back through the natural-length position.
Forecast: Two PE stores change: spring (releases 2 1 k x 2 ) and gravity (the bead rises by x , which costs m g x ). Net energy → KE. Speed should be a bit less than the pure-spring 2 m/s from example (c) in the parent, because gravity steals some.
Spring energy released: 2 1 k x 2 = 2 1 ( 200 ) ( 0.10 ) 2 = 1.0 J .
Why this step? Spring goes from compressed to natural length → all its PE is freed.
Gravity PE gained (bead rose height x ): m g x = 0.5 × 9.8 × 0.10 = 0.49 J .
Why this step? Rising costs energy; we must subtract it, not add — the classic exam trap of double-counting or wrong sign.
KE at natural length: 2 1 m v 2 = 1.0 − 0.49 = 0.51 J , so v = 0.5 2 ( 0.51 ) = 1.428 m/s .
Verify: v ≈ 1.43 m/s , less than the horizontal-case 2 m/s ✓ (gravity took 0.49 J). Units check: J / kg = m/s ✓.
Recall Quick self-test on the matrix
Which cell has U < 0 yet Δ U can be either sign? ::: G3 — full gravity: U is always negative, but moving inward gives Δ U < 0 , moving outward Δ U > 0 .
Why does compressing a spring store the same energy as stretching it equally? ::: U = 2 1 k x 2 depends on x 2 , so sign of x doesn't matter (cell S2 = S1).
In example (h), why subtract m g x ? ::: The bead rose, so gravitational PE increased — that energy is unavailable to KE (cell X1, avoid double-counting).