1.2.12 · D5Newton's Laws & Dynamics
Question bank — Pulley systems — mechanical advantage
This bank hammers the traps that live inside Pulley systems — mechanical advantage. Before starting, lock in the vocabulary below — every trap answer uses these exact symbols.
Visual warm-up — see the strands before you count them
Deriving the movable-pulley constraint (referenced in the traps)
Several traps below hinge on the rule . It is never to be guessed — here is where it comes from, so you can defend it.
True or false — justify
True or false: A single fixed pulley gives you mechanical advantage greater than 1.
False. Only one strand supports the load, so and ; a fixed pulley redirects force (pull down to lift up) but never multiplies it.
True or false: In an ideal system, adding a second fixed pulley in the rope path increases the mechanical advantage.
False. A fixed pulley adds only redirection — it doesn't add a strand supporting the movable block. depends on supporting strands, not total pulley count.
True or false: If a pulley system has , you get four times the energy out compared to what you put in.
False. Energy is conserved: . You get 4× the force, but you pull 4× the distance, so the energy product (force × distance) is unchanged — no extra energy appears.
True or false: In one continuous ideal rope, the tension is the same on both sides of every pulley it crosses.
True. Take a tiny piece of massless rope: Newton's 2nd law says (mass is zero), so the pull on its left must exactly equal the pull on its right — meaning is the same all along. A frictionless pulley only changes direction, never magnitude.
True or false: Making the pulley heavier increases the actual mechanical advantage.
False — it decreases it. A massive pulley demands extra tension just to lift and spin itself, so the real force you save shrinks: drops, and efficiency falls below 1.
True or false: In an Atwood machine with , the tension in the rope equals the weight of one block.
True. With equal masses , so each block is in equilibrium: the tension exactly balances one weight, . The system is balanced, not accelerating.
True or false: The ideal mechanical advantage of a system tells you its efficiency.
False. is set by geometry alone; efficiency compares actual to ideal, , and only drops below 1 for real pulleys with friction/mass. An ideal system has large yet .
True or false: In a movable-pulley setup, the load and your hand always move the same distance.
False. If 2 strands support the load, your hand moves twice as far as the load rises, because both strands must shorten by the lift height , so you reel in (see Figure 3).
True or false: For a movable pulley, the pulley's acceleration equals the sum of the two rope-end accelerations.
False. It equals the average: , derived from constant rope length in Figure 4 (Constraint relations).
Spot the error
A student writes: "Two masses over a fixed pulley, so tension on the heavy side is bigger than on the light side." Find the error.
One ideal rope means one tension: a massless-rope piece has , forcing equal pull on both sides. The net force is bigger on the heavy side (its weight wins), but the string tension is identical everywhere.
A student sets up an Atwood machine and writes and , then concludes . Spot the error.
They forgot to divide by total mass. Adding the equations cancels and gives , so , not .
A student claims: "A movable pulley has , so if I attach a load of , the tension I feel is ." Spot the error.
Backwards. means the two strands split the weight, so your effort tension is halved: , not doubled.
A student counts strands for a block-and-tackle: "There are 5 pulleys, so ." Spot the error.
is not the pulley count. Count only the rope segments supporting the movable block; fixed pulleys add redirection, not strands.
A student says: "The load rises , so I pull of rope through my hand in any pulley system." Spot the error.
Only true when . For supporting strands, all must shorten by , so you pull == metres== of rope (Figure 3 shows the case).
A student writes the constraint for a movable pulley as . Spot the error.
Guessing accelerations are equal is wrong. Constant rope length gives ; differentiating twice yields ==== — the pulley moves at the average of the two ends (Figure 4).
A student states: "Since MA lets me lift more with less force, a pulley system violates conservation of energy in my favour." Spot the error.
No violation — you trade force for distance. Work is force × distance; the extra rope you reel in ( times longer) exactly cancels the force reduction (), so (the equal blue areas in Figure 3).
Why questions
Why is the tension the same everywhere in a single massless rope?
Take any tiny segment: Newton's 2nd law gives , and with this is , so the pull on each side must be equal. A frictionless pulley only redirects that pull, keeping its size fixed.
Why does mechanical advantage equal the number of supporting strands?
Because equal-tension strands share the weight: their upward pulls balance the load, , so each carries . Your effort is one strand's tension , giving .
Why must you pull farther when the mechanical advantage is higher?
Because energy force × distance is conserved. To keep that product fixed while the force drops by factor , the distance must ==rise by factor == — exactly the two equal-area rectangles in Figure 3.
Why do we add the two Atwood equations instead of subtracting?
Adding ==eliminates the unknown tension == instantly — it appears as in one equation and in the other, so they cancel, leaving a single equation for .
Why does a fixed pulley still count as rather than ?
The load hangs from one strand of the rope, which supports its full weight (Figure 1). That single supporting strand gives ; the pulley just changes its direction.
Why does a real pulley have efficiency below 100%?
Some input work goes into overcoming friction and lifting the pulley's own mass, so the useful output is less than the input: , making .
Why is the movable pulley — not the fixed one — the source of force multiplication?
Only the movable pulley has multiple strands leaving it to hold the load (its up-arrows share , Figure 2); a fixed pulley just has the rope pass over it, one strand still carrying the whole load.
Why does the "2" appear in the movable-pulley constraint ?
Because two rope segments run down to the movable pulley (Figure 4). The length ; differentiating twice puts a factor on the pulley's acceleration.
Edge cases
Edge case: What is the mechanical advantage if you pull the effort rope straight down over a fixed pulley to lift a load, and ?
: no multiplication, and you must pull with force equal to the full weight — but at least you can use your body weight conveniently by pulling down.
Edge case: In an Atwood machine, what happens to the acceleration as ?
. With nothing on the other side, is in free fall — the rope goes slack, tension .
Edge case: In an Atwood machine, what happens as ?
and . The system is balanced; any position stays put (neutral equilibrium in the ideal case).
Edge case: What is the of a movable pulley if you pull the free end downward versus upward — does the answer change?
No. counts supporting strands (), a geometric fact independent of the direction you happen to pull the free end.
Edge case: If the rope has significant mass, is the tension still uniform?
No. A massive rope needs a net force to accelerate itself, so and tension varies along it; the "one rope, one tension" rule holds only in the ideal, massless case.
Edge case: A movable pulley is held so the load does not move (). Is there still mechanical advantage?
Yes. is a static/geometric property: even in equilibrium, strands share the weight, so .
Edge case: What is the effort distance if the load is lowered instead of raised by with strands?
You feed out of rope (same magnitude, opposite direction). The distance trade-off is symmetric; energy bookkeeping still balances.
Recall One-line survival summary
Count supporting strands for ; one ideal rope has one tension; higher MA means proportionally longer pull; energy is always conserved. Question :::- If a claim ignores the distance penalty or invents extra tension across an ideal pulley, it is wrong.
Connections
- Parent: Pulley systems — mechanical advantage — the full derivation these traps test.
- Newton's Second Law — why massless rope forces .
- Tension in strings — the one-rope-one-tension rule.
- Work–Energy Theorem — the bookkeeping behind every "no free lunch" answer.
- Constraint relations — the constraint (Figure 4).
- Atwood machine — source of the dynamic edge cases.
- Friction — why real efficiency drops below 1.
- Inclined plane mechanical advantage — the same force-for-distance trade elsewhere.