1.1.2 · D4Measurement, Vectors & Kinematics

Exercises — SI units — seven base units and all derived units

2,755 words13 min readBack to topic

Before we start, three conventions we lean on the whole page:


Level 1 — Recognition

"Can you name the brick and read a table?"

L1.1

Which of these is an SI base unit, and which is derived? .

Recall Solution L1.1

A base unit is one of the seven fundamental bricks; a derived unit is built from them by an equation.

  • base (temperature).
  • base (amount of substance).
  • base (luminous intensity).
  • derived, from , so .
  • derived, from (power = work per time), so .

L1.2

Give the SI unit and its symbol for: length, mass, time, electric current.

Recall Solution L1.2
Quantity Unit name Symbol
Length metre
Mass kilogram
Time second
Electric current ampere

L1.3

The unit of energy is named the joule, with unit symbol . Fill in its base-brick form:

Recall Solution L1.3

From work (work = force along a distance): multiply the newton's bricks by a metre. Here is just the name we give the resulting brick-pattern.


Level 2 — Application

"Take a standard law, substitute base bricks, simplify."

L2.1

Derive the base-unit form of the pascal (pressure) starting from .

Recall Solution L2.1

What: pressure is force spread over an area. Why substitute: the pascal has no independent standard — it is generated by this equation. The in the numerator meets below: .

L2.2

A car of mass speeds up from rest to in . Find the force in newtons, then confirm the answer's unit reduces to base bricks.

Recall Solution L2.2

Step 1 (acceleration): . Step 2 (force): . Unit check: , as required. See Kinematics — velocity and acceleration for the step and Newton's Laws of Motion for .

L2.3

Show the coulomb and volt in base bricks, given and (voltage = work done per unit charge).

Recall Solution L2.3

Charge: . Voltage: energy per charge, so The over gives ; the in the denominator becomes .


Level 3 — Analysis

"Combine several derived units, or work backwards from a unit to an equation."

L3.1

Find the base-unit form of the farad (capacitance). We call the capacitance (reserving upright for the coulomb), and it obeys .

Recall Solution L3.1

What we do: divide charge bricks by voltage bricks. Why: capacitance is "charge stored per volt applied", so its recipe is exactly that ratio . Dividing means subtract exponents and flip the denominator's signs:

=\ \text{A}^2\text{·s}^4\text{·kg}^{-1}\text{·m}^{-2}.$$ This is the base-brick form of the **farad ($\text{F}$)** — it matches the reference table.

L3.2

The ohm is . Use it together with the power law to show that really has the unit of the watt.

Recall Solution L3.2

Step 1 — get the ohm's bricks. Why? We can't check until we know what contributes, and tells us: divide the volt's bricks by an ampere. (The lone below lowers the ampere power by one: .)

Step 2 — multiply by . Why? The power dissipated in a resistor is , so to test its unit we substitute squared and the ohm bricks we just found. Why the amperes vanish: the current appears squared () and the ohm carries , so they add to , leaving exactly the watt.

L3.3

A student measures a quantity with base-unit form . Which named unit is this, and from what equation does it come?

Recall Solution L3.3

We write magnetic flux as (the Greek capital "phi", a common symbol for flux — a measure of how much magnetic field threads through a loop). Reading the bricks against the table, is the weber (Wb), the unit of that flux . It comes from (flux = voltage × time), since , matching exactly.


Level 4 — Synthesis

"Chain multiple laws to build an unfamiliar unit, or check an equation you were handed."

The moves in this level all follow the brick-flow below: base bricks snap into the newton via , then the newton snaps into the joule (× metre) and the watt (÷ second). Keep this picture in mind for L4.3, where we rebuild the watt a second way from and check it lands in the same box.

Figure — SI units — seven base units and all derived units

L4.1

The gravitational constant appears in , where is the separation distance between the two masses (a length, so ). Derive in base bricks, then use it to find the unit of where is a density (mass per volume).

Recall Solution L4.1

Step 1 — isolate . Why? The unit of is hidden until is alone on one side, so we rearrange the law: . Since we have . Substitute base bricks: Step 2 — density. . Step 3 — product . Why multiply? The expression asks for , so we combine bricks by adding exponents: Step 4 — square root. Why? The expression is , and a square root halves every exponent: = a frequency (hertz). Beautiful: is an inverse-time — it sets a natural gravitational timescale.

L4.2

Check whether the equation (escape-speed formula) is dimensionally consistent — i.e. does the right side reduce to a speed ? Here is a mass and the separation distance, .

Recall Solution L4.2

Why a check and not a solve? We are not finding a number; we test whether the bricks on both sides match. If they don't, the equation is definitely wrong (see Dimensional Analysis). The is dimensionless and drops. Take the square root: Consistent. (Note: consistency does not prove the factor — dimension checks can't catch pure numbers.)

L4.3

Power delivered by a force pushing an object at velocity is . Show its bricks equal the watt, and confirm it lands in the same box as the route in the figure.

Recall Solution L4.3

Why this route? The figure builds the watt as newton ÷ second (from ). Here we build it a different way — force × velocity — and if physics is consistent the bricks must agree. Substitute (, ) and add exponents because we multiply: Same box as the figure's watt — both routes agree. See Work, Energy and Power.


Level 5 — Mastery

"Invent the recipe for a unit you've never met, and reason about degenerate/limiting cases."

L5.1

The tesla (magnetic flux density) satisfies the magnetic force law , where is charge, speed, the field. Derive in base bricks and confirm it equals .

Recall Solution L5.1

Step 1 — isolate . Why? Same reason as before: the field's unit only reveals itself once is alone, so . Step 2 — build the denominator's bricks, exponent by exponent. Why carefully? Stray powers hide here, so we write every base brick's exponent explicitly before cancelling. With and :

=\text{A}^{1}\,\text{m}^{1}\,\text{s}^{\,1+(-1)} =\text{A}^{1}\,\text{m}^{1}\,\text{s}^{0}=\text{A·m}.$$ (The two second-exponents, $+1$ from $q$ and $-1$ from $v$, add to $\text{s}^0=1$ — this is the exact place a stray $\text{s}$ goes missing if you cancel too early.) **Step 3 — divide, exponent by exponent:** $$[B]=\frac{[F]}{[qv]}=\frac{\text{kg}^{1}\text{·m}^{1}\text{·s}^{-2}}{\text{A}^{1}\text{·m}^{1}} =\text{kg}^{1}\;\text{m}^{\,1-1}\;\text{s}^{-2}\;\text{A}^{\,0-1} =\text{kg·s}^{-2}\text{·A}^{-1}.$$ The metres cancel ($\text{m}^{1-1}=\text{m}^0$); the ampere moves down to $\text{A}^{-1}$. This is the tesla.

L5.2

A quantity obeys , where is the Planck constant (, i.e. ) and is charge (). Find in base bricks and identify the named unit.

Recall Solution L5.2

What we do: divide Planck's bricks by charge's bricks. Why: is defined as the ratio , so its unit-recipe is exactly .

=\text{kg·m}^2\text{·s}^{-1-1}\text{·A}^{-1}=\text{kg·m}^2\text{·s}^{-2}\text{·A}^{-1}.$$ The $\text{s}^{-1}$ over $\text{s}^{+1}$ gives $\text{s}^{-2}$; the ampere in the denominator becomes $\text{A}^{-1}$. Reading the table, that is the **weber (Wb)** — magnetic flux. (Physically, $h/e$ is the scale of the magnetic flux quantum.)

L5.3 (degenerate/limit reasoning)

Consider , i.e. mass times acceleration raised to the zero power. (a) What are its bricks? (b) Explain, using the brick idea, why raising any quantity to the power contributes no bricks — and what the single edge case is. (c) How does this connect to the radian being dimensionless?

Recall Solution L5.3

(a) (a pure number), so . Just a mass. (b) Every exponent tells you how many copies of that brick you multiply in. Power = "zero copies of the brick" = the empty product = the dimensionless . So is dimensionless — it adds nothing to the recipe. Edge case: if the quantity itself is literally zero (like ), then is mathematically undefined. In physics we sidestep this: unit analysis treats as a symbol carrying bricks, never as the number , so is always safe. The trap is only the numerical , not the dimensional one. (c) The radian (from the opening definition) is another dimensionless quantity: . Both and land on the same "no-brick" pattern — a unit check cannot tell them apart, which is exactly why named-but-dimensionless units exist to remind humans what the ratio meant.


Recall One-line ladder summary

Every rung used the same move: write , substitute the seven base bricks, add exponents when multiplying / subtract when dividing, and let dimensionless numbers fall away.

Level ladder recap
L1 name the brick, L2 substitute one law, L3 combine derived units, L4 chain laws & check consistency, L5 invent a new recipe & handle the power-0 edge case.
Why does share units with ?
because is a pure number carrying zero bricks.
Does a passed dimension check prove a formula correct?
No — it is necessary but not sufficient; it cannot see pure numerical factors.
Why write work as and capacitance as on this page?
to keep them distinct from the unit symbols watt and coulomb .
Why is the radian dimensionless?
it is arc length over radius, , so it carries no base bricks.