Intuition What this page is
The parent note taught you the machine : every quantity is number × unit, and every unit is built from the seven base units. This page runs that machine on every kind of input it can meet — clean numbers, awkward fractions, zero, powers, negative exponents, and a couple of exam traps. If you can do all ten below, no dimensional-analysis question can surprise you.
Prerequisites you can revisit: Physical quantities — fundamental and derived , SI Units and Prefixes , Dimensional Analysis , Newton's Second Law .
Before any symbol appears, one reminder in plain words. When we write [ X ] with square brackets , we mean "the units of X " — nothing else. So [ speed ] = m s − 1 is read "the units of speed are metres per second". Whenever units multiply or divide, their exponents add or subtract , exactly like ordinary algebra with letters. That single rule — treat units like letters — is the whole game.
One more tool we will lean on repeatedly. When you switch a quantity to a smaller unit, you need more copies of it, so the number grows. Written out:
Definition The conversion identity
n 1 u 1 = n 2 u 2
A fixed physical quantity can be written as (number 1 ) × (unit 1 ) or as (number 2 ) × (unit 2 ). Because the quantity itself is unchanged, these two products are equal:
n 1 u 1 = n 2 u 2
Here n is the numerical value and u is the unit . Example: a length is 2 m or 200 cm — the number went up by 100 exactly because the unit (cm) is 100× smaller than the metre. Smaller unit ⇒ bigger number; the product stays put. This is the engine behind every conversion on this page.
Every dimensional-analysis question falls into one of these cells. The examples below are tagged with the cell they cover, and together they fill the whole table.
Cell
Case class
What makes it tricky
Example
A
Pure multiply (build a unit)
keep track of all base units
Ex 1 (Newton)
B
Divide → negative exponent
m / m 2 = m − 1
Ex 2 (Pascal)
C
Power of a quantity
exponent multiplies through
Ex 3 (area, volume)
D
Unit conversion (chain of ×1)
which fraction goes on top?
Ex 4 (density)
E
Dimensionless result
everything must cancel
Ex 5 (angle, strain)
F
Zero / degenerate input
does the unit survive when the number is 0?
Ex 6
G
Limiting / very-large value
prefixes and orders of magnitude
Ex 7 (prefix chain)
H
Real-world word problem
translate words → symbols first
Ex 8 (fuel economy)
I
Exam twist — find an unknown exponent
solve for a power by matching units
Ex 9
J
Exam trap — hidden inconsistency
spot the wrong equation by units
Ex 10
Worked example Ex 1 · Base units of the
newton
Statement: Force is defined by Newton's Second Law as F = ma . Express 1 N in base units.
Forecast: before reading on, guess — how many separate base units will appear, and what powers of each?
Write each factor's units. Mass m has unit kg ; acceleration a = time velocity = s m s − 1 = m s − 2 .
Why this step? We can only combine units once we know each piece's units separately.
Multiply, treating units as letters.
[ F ] = [ m ] [ a ] = ( kg ) ( m s − 2 ) = kg m s − 2
Why this step? F = ma multiplies the numbers , so the units multiply too — same arithmetic.
Verify: Three base units appear (kg, m, s) with powers + 1 , + 1 , − 2 . This is the SI definition of the newton, so 1 N = 1 kg m s − 2 . ✓
The bar chart below shows how the exponents of the base units stack up for the newton — a visual "fingerprint" you will reuse for every derived unit on this page. The horizontal axis names the three base units; the vertical axis is the power each is raised to.
Worked example Ex 2 · Base units of the
pascal
Statement: Pressure P = A F , force divided by area. Find its base units.
Forecast: guess the sign of the exponent on the metre — will it be positive or negative?
Units on top: [ F ] = kg m s − 2 (from Ex 1).
Why this step? The numerator of P is a force, so we must first replace "force" by its already-known base units before we can cancel anything.
Units on the bottom: area is length × length, so [ A ] = m 2 .
Why this step? Area is a derived quantity too; we can't leave it as "area", we need its base units.
Divide → subtract exponents of like units.
[ P ] = m 2 kg m s − 2 = kg m 1 − 2 s − 2 = kg m − 1 s − 2
Why this step? m 1 ÷ m 2 = m 1 − 2 = m − 1 — the metre ends up on the bottom.
Verify: 1 Pa = 1 kg m − 1 s − 2 . Negative exponent means "metre in the denominator", which matches force spread over area. ✓
The figure contrasts the newton's fingerprint with the pascal's: two bars per base unit (a legend tells them apart), and you can watch the metre bar flip from + 1 (up) to − 1 (down) when we divide by area. Axes are labelled just as in the previous figure.
Worked example Ex 3 · Units of
area and volume , and why the power multiplies
Statement: A square of side ℓ has area ℓ 2 ; a cube has volume ℓ 3 . What are the units?
Forecast: if length is m , guess the units of ℓ 2 and ℓ 5 before deriving them.
Area: [ ℓ 2 ] = ( m ) 2 = m 2 . Why? Squaring the quantity squares its unit — the exponent 2 lands on the metre.
Volume: [ ℓ 3 ] = ( m ) 3 = m 3 .
Why this step? Volume is length stacked three times (ℓ × ℓ × ℓ ), so the metre is multiplied by itself three times, giving the power 3 .
General rule: [ ℓ n ] = m n . So [ ℓ 5 ] = m 5 .
Why this step? An exponent outside a bracket multiplies every exponent inside: ( m 1 ) n = m 1 ⋅ n .
Verify: Side 3 m ⇒ area 3 2 = 9 m 2 , volume 3 3 = 27 m 3 . Numbers and units both track the power. ✓
The picture makes the "power multiplies through" idea literal: one length gives a line, two give a square, three give a cube — the exponent counts how many perpendicular copies of the metre you stacked.
Worked example Ex 4 · Convert a
density from g cm − 3 to kg m − 3
Statement: Water has density 1 g cm − 3 . Express it in the SI derived unit kg m − 3 .
Forecast: water in SI is famously 1000 kg m − 3 . Predict why the number jumps by exactly 1000 .
Write the conversion factors, each equal to 1. 1000 g 1 kg = 1 and 1 m 100 cm = 1 .
Why this step? By the identity n 1 u 1 = n 2 u 2 defined above, 1 kg = 1000 g is the same mass, so their ratio is exactly the number 1 . Multiplying by 1 never changes the quantity — it only relabels units.
Handle the cubed length. Because the unit is cm − 3 , the length factor must be cubed: ( 1 m 100 cm ) 3 .
Why this step? The metre appears to the power − 3 , so its conversion applies three times.
Multiply it all out.
1 cm 3 g × 1000 g 1 kg × ( 1 m 100 cm ) 3 = 1000 1 × 10 0 3 m 3 kg = 1 0 3 1 0 6 = 1000 kg m − 3
Why this step? We chain the factors so that grams cancel grams and centimetres cancel centimetres, leaving only the SI units; the leftover numbers (10 0 3 on top, 1000 underneath) then multiply out to the final figure.
Verify: 10 0 3 = 1 0 6 , divided by 1 0 3 gives 1 0 3 = 1000 . Units left: kg m − 3 . ✓ Matches the known value.
Worked example Ex 5 · Show that
angle and strain are dimensionless
Statement: An angle in radians is θ = radius arc length ; strain is ε = original length change in length . Find their units.
Forecast: guess what unit is left after the division.
Angle: [ θ ] = m m = m 1 − 1 = m 0 = 1 .
Why this step? Length ÷ length has the metre to the power 1 − 1 = 0 , and anything to the power 0 is 1 — no unit.
Strain: [ ε ] = m m = 1 , identically.
Verify: Both are pure numbers. This is why the radian is a supplementary/derived unit, not a base one — the mistake the parent note warns about. ✓ (See figure for the arc-over-radius picture.)
Worked example Ex 6 · Does a
zero value still carry a unit?
Statement: A car starts from rest: initial velocity v 0 = 0 . In the equation v = v 0 + a t , does the 0 have units?
Forecast: is "0 m s − 1 " different from a bare "0 "?
Check the equation is unit-consistent. Every term of a valid physics equation must share the same units. Here every term must be m s − 1 .
Why this step? You cannot add quantities of different units — like adding metres to seconds.
Give the zero its unit. So v 0 = 0 m s − 1 , not a dimensionless 0 .
Why this step? The number is zero but the slot still measures a velocity; the unit tags what kind of nothing it is.
Degenerate check — zero area in Ex 2. If area A → 0 in P = F / A , pressure → ∞ : units stay Pa but the value blows up.
Why this step? Zero in a denominator is a genuine limit, not a value — the unit survives, the number does not.
Verify: v = 0 m s − 1 + ( 2 m s − 2 ) ( 3 s ) = 6 m s − 1 . All terms in m s − 1 , and the zero pulled its weight unit-wise. ✓
very large length: light-year to metres via prefixes
Statement: Light travels at c = 3.0 × 1 0 8 m s − 1 . How many metres in one light-year (the distance light covers in 1 year ≈ 3.15 × 1 0 7 s )? Express with a prefix.
Forecast: order-of-magnitude guess — is it closer to 1 0 15 or 1 0 20 metres?
Distance = speed × time. [ d ] = ( m s − 1 ) ( s ) = m — the seconds cancel.
Why this step? s − 1 × s = s 0 = 1 ; only the metre survives, as a distance should.
Multiply the numbers.
d = ( 3.0 × 1 0 8 ) ( 3.15 × 1 0 7 ) = 9.45 × 1 0 15 m
Why this step? Numbers and powers of ten multiply separately: 3.0 × 3.15 = 9.45 handles the mantissas, while 1 0 8 × 1 0 7 = 1 0 15 adds the exponents — the same "add exponents when multiplying" rule we use for units.
Attach a prefix. 1 0 15 = peta (P) , so d ≈ 9.45 Pm .
Why this step? SI Units and Prefixes lets huge numbers ride on a prefix instead of scientific notation.
Verify: 3.0 × 3.15 = 9.45 ; 1 0 8 × 1 0 7 = 1 0 15 . So 9.45 × 1 0 15 m . ✓ Between 1 0 15 and 1 0 16 — the peta scale.
Fuel economy — translate words, then units
Statement: A car uses 6.0 litres of fuel per 100 km . Convert this to the "distance per volume" figure in km L − 1 (kilometres per litre), then to base-SI m m − 3 = m − 2 .
Forecast: "distance per volume" gives units m − 2 — an inverse area. Guess why an inverse area appears.
Translate the words. "6.0 L per 100 km" is 100 km 6.0 L . We want distance per fuel, so invert : 6.0 L 100 km = 16.7 km L − 1 .
Why this step? "distance per volume" puts distance on top; the question flips the given ratio.
To base SI. 1 km = 1 0 3 m , and 1 L (litre) = 1 0 − 3 m 3 .
Why this step? Each of these is again the identity n 1 u 1 = n 2 u 2 in disguise: 1 km and 1 0 3 m are the same distance, 1 L and 1 0 − 3 m 3 the same volume, so substituting them changes nothing physical — it only re-expresses each unit in base SI so the exponents can be combined in the next line.
Combine and cancel exponents.
16.7 L km = 16.7 × 1 0 − 3 m 3 1 0 3 m = 16.7 × 1 0 6 m m − 3 = 1.67 × 1 0 7 m − 2
Why this step? m 3 m = m 1 − 3 = m − 2 . The reciprocal figure — volume per distance, m 3 / m = m 2 — is literally the cross-sectional area of fuel the engine "sweeps up" per metre travelled; distance-per-volume is just its inverse, hence m − 2 .
Verify: 100/6.0 = 16.67 ; 1 0 3 /1 0 − 3 = 1 0 6 ; 16.67 × 1 0 6 = 1.667 × 1 0 7 m − 2 . ✓
Worked example Ex 9 · The
period of a pendulum — solve for the power
Statement: A pendulum's period T (a time, unit s ) depends on length ℓ (m) and gravity g (m s − 2 ) as T = k ℓ a g b , where k is a dimensionless constant. Find a and b using Dimensional Analysis .
Forecast: guess the sign of b — should stronger gravity make the swing faster or slower?
Write units of both sides. Left: [ T ] = s = m 0 s 1 . Right: [ ℓ a g b ] = ( m ) a ( m s − 2 ) b = m a + b s − 2 b .
Why this step? A valid equation must have identical units on both sides, letter by letter.
Match the exponent of each base unit.
Metre: a + b = 0 .
Second: − 2 b = 1 ⇒ b = − 2 1 .
Why this step? Two unknowns need two equations; each base unit contributes exactly one equation because its exponent must agree on the left and right.
Solve the two linked equations. The "second" equation already gives b = − 2 1 on its own. Substitute that into the "metre" equation a + b = 0 : a = − b = + 2 1 .
Why this step? We solve them in sequence — the second-unit equation has only b , so it pins b first; then the metre equation, now containing only the unknown a , is trivial to finish. This is standard back-substitution for two linked linear equations.
Result: a = + 2 1 , b = − 2 1 , so
T = k ℓ 1/2 g − 1/2 = k g ℓ .
Verify: This matches the true pendulum formula T = 2 π ℓ / g (with k = 2 π , which dimensional analysis cannot supply). b < 0 : bigger g ⇒ smaller T ⇒ faster swing, matching intuition. ✓
Worked example Ex 10 · Which equation is
dimensionally impossible ?
Statement: Two students propose formulas for distance s (unit m):
(i) s = v t + 2 1 a t 2 , and (ii) s = v t 2 + 2 1 a t . Only one can be right — decide by units alone.
Forecast: guess which one fails before checking, just from the powers of t .
Units of each term in (i). v t = ( m s − 1 ) ( s ) = m . a t 2 = ( m s − 2 ) ( s 2 ) = m . Both metres. ✓
Why this step? Adding requires matching units; both terms give metres, consistent with s .
Units of each term in (ii). v t 2 = ( m s − 1 ) ( s 2 ) = m s . a t = ( m s − 2 ) ( s ) = m s − 1 .
Why this step? Neither term is a metre, and they don't even match each other — you cannot add m s to m s − 1 .
Conclude. Equation (ii) is dimensionally impossible; (i) is the correct kinematic equation.
Why this step? A formula is only valid if every added term shares the units of the left-hand side (m ); since (ii)'s terms are neither metres nor even equal to each other, it cannot describe a distance, so we discard it.
Verify: In (i) every term is m ; in (ii) terms are m s and m s − 1 , neither equal to m . Dimensional analysis rejects (ii). ✓ (It can rule formulas out , never confirm dimensionless constants — the 2 1 is invisible to it.)
Recall One-line self-tests
Units of pressure in base SI ::: kg m⁻¹ s⁻²
Why does dividing lengths give a dimensionless angle? ::: m ÷ m = m⁰ = 1, no unit left
In v = v₀ + at with v₀ = 0, what unit does the 0 carry? ::: m s⁻¹ (the slot still measures velocity)
Converting g cm⁻³ to kg m⁻³ multiplies the number by ::: 1000
For T = k ℓᵃ gᵇ, the exponents are ::: a = +½, b = −½
Which fails units: s = vt + ½at² or s = vt² + ½at? ::: the second (vt² + ½at)
Mnemonic The one rule behind all ten
"Units are letters." Multiply → add exponents. Divide → subtract. Power → multiply through. Match both sides → solve unknowns. Cancel to nothing → dimensionless.