Exercises — Limits and continuity in 2D — path-dependence issue
This page assumes you have read the parent topic on path-dependence. If any symbol below feels unfamiliar, that note builds it. We also lean on the Squeeze Theorem, Polar Coordinates, and the Epsilon-Delta Definition.
Level 1 — Recognition
(Read off the behaviour; minimal computation.)
L1·Q1
Evaluate along the -axis and the -axis: Do the two axis-limits agree?
Recall Solution
Along -axis set : Along -axis set : WHAT we did: collapsed to 1D twice. WHY: cheapest paths first. They give and . Verdict: two paths disagree limit DNE.
L1·Q2
True or false: for because the numerator has higher degree than the denominator, the limit is .
Recall Solution
True. Numerator degree , denominator degree , so heuristically it behaves like . We confirm with a bound in L3, but as a recognition call the answer is . (This is a forecast, not yet a proof.)
L1·Q3
For , guess the limit at the origin (degree count only).
Recall Solution
Numerator degree , denominator degree : behaves like . Forecast: . (Proved in L2.)
Level 2 — Application
(Run the standard machinery to a clean answer.)
L2·Q1
Prove or disprove:
Recall Solution
Use the same idea as . Since , we have . Then As , . By the Squeeze Theorem the limit is . Forecast confirmed.
L2·Q2
Evaluate
Recall Solution
Polar: . WHY polar: the in the denominator cancels cleanly, exposing an in front. Since for every , we get . The bound is -independent, so the limit is .
L2·Q3
Show that
Recall Solution
Polar: numerator ; denominator . Since , we get . Limit .
Level 3 — Analysis
(Find the path that breaks it, or prove nothing can.)
L3·Q1
Decide with proof whether the limit exists:
Recall Solution
Polar: WHAT this shows: the value is pure — no left. So walking in along direction you land on . Along -axis (): value . Along -axis (): value . Different directions → different values → limit DNE.
L3·Q2
The classic trap. Show does not exist, even though every straight line gives .
Recall Solution
All lines : Every line says . Curve : WHY : it makes numerator and denominator the same order () — the "balanced" path lines cannot see. Lines give , curve gives → limit DNE. See figure: the two paths and their level values.

L3·Q3
Investigate
Recall Solution
All lines : (for ; gives too). Curve (chosen to balance orders — denominator terms both become ): Lines give , curve gives → limit DNE.
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Combine continuity, piecewise values, and multiple tools.)
L4·Q1
Define Is continuous at the origin? Prove it.
Recall Solution
Continuity needs three things: exists (it's ), the limit exists, and they match. From the parent Worked Example 3, , so the limit is . Since , is continuous at the origin. ✔
L4·Q2
Define Is there any value making continuous at the origin?
Recall Solution
Continuity requires the limit to exist first. But has, in polar, value — pure , so along it is and along it is . Limit DNE. Since no single exists, no choice of can make continuous. ✗ Key point: continuity cannot repair a path-dependent limit — the defect is in the surface, not in the assigned value.
L4·Q3
Let for . What value at the origin makes continuous?
Recall Solution
Substitute . As , , and (the standard 1D limit — allowed here because depends on only through , so no direction can matter). Thus the limit is , and is continuous at the origin iff we set .
Level 5 — Mastery
(Full rigour: build the argument from bounds / –.)
L5·Q1
Give a rigorous $\varepsilon$–$\delta$ proof that
Recall Solution
Goal: given , find with Bound: , so Choose . Then forces . This holds on the whole disk of radius , not merely on paths — so it is airtight.
L5·Q2
Construct a function that is along every straight line through the origin but whose limit at the origin is . (Generalise the trap.)
Recall Solution
Take Wait — verify. Lines : Every line gives . ✔ Curve : Along this parabola the value is constantly . ✔ So is on all lines yet reaches on — the limit DNE, and in particular it is not . This is the exact mechanism of the L3·Q2 trap, tuned to hit value . See figure.

L5·Q3
Prove that does not exist, being careful to test the axes AND the diagonal.
Recall Solution
Along -axis (): numerator , denominator , so . Along -axis (): numerator , so . Along the diagonal : then , so WHY the diagonal: the term vanishes exactly on , killing the "spoiler" in the denominator and leaving . Axes give , diagonal gives → limit DNE.
Connections
- Multivariable Calculus — parent chapter
- Squeeze Theorem — proves the "limit exists" problems (L2, L4, L5)
- Polar Coordinates — the test used throughout L2–L3
- Epsilon-Delta Definition — rigour engine for L5·Q1
- Differentiability in 2D — needs the continuity established in L4