4.4.2 · D4 · HinglishMultivariable Calculus

ExercisesLimits and continuity in 2D — path-dependence issue

1,936 words9 min read↑ Read in English

4.4.2 · D4 · Maths › Multivariable Calculus › Limits and continuity in 2D — path-dependence issue

Is page ko padhne se pehle assume kiya gaya hai ki aapne parent topic on path-dependence padh li hai. Agar neeche koi bhi symbol unfamiliar lage, toh woh note use build karta hai. Hum Squeeze Theorem, Polar Coordinates, aur Epsilon-Delta Definition ka bhi sahara lete hain.


Level 1 — Recognition

(Behaviour seedha padh lo; minimal computation.)

L1·Q1

-axis aur -axis ke along evaluate karo: Kya dono axis-limits agree karte hain?

Recall Solution

-axis ke along rakh do: -axis ke along rakh do: Humne kya kiya: do baar 1D mein collapse kiya. Kyun: sabse saste paths pehle. Yeh aur dete hain. Verdict: do paths disagree karte hain limit DNE.

L1·Q2

Sach ya jhooth: is limit ke liye kyunki numerator ki degree denominator se zyada hai, limit hai.

Recall Solution

Sach. Numerator degree , denominator degree , toh heuristically yeh jaisa behave karta hai. Hum L3 mein ek bound se confirm karenge, lekin recognition call ke taur par answer hai. (Yeh ek forecast hai, abhi proof nahi.)

L1·Q3

ke liye origin par limit guess karo (sirf degree count se).

Recall Solution

Numerator degree , denominator degree : jaisa behave karta hai. Forecast: . (L2 mein prove hoga.)


Level 2 — Application

(Standard machinery chalao aur clean answer lao.)

L2·Q1

Prove ya disprove karo:

Recall Solution

Wohi idea use karo jaise . Kyunki hai, isliye hai. Tab Jab , toh . Squeeze Theorem se limit hai. Forecast confirm hua.

L2·Q2

Evaluate karo

Recall Solution

Polar: . Polar kyun: denominator mein cleanly cancel ho jaata hai, aur aage expose ho jaata hai. Kyunki har ke liye hai, hume milta hai . Bound -independent hai, toh limit hai.

L2·Q3

Dikhao ki

Recall Solution

Polar: numerator ; denominator . Kyunki hai, hume milta hai . Limit .


Level 3 — Analysis

(Woh path dhundho jo todi deta hai, ya prove karo ki kuch nahi toda sakta.)

L3·Q1

Proof ke saath decide karo ki limit exist karti hai ya nahi:

Recall Solution

Polar: Yeh kya dikhata hai: value pure hai — koi nahi bacha. Toh direction ke along andar jaane par aap par pahunchte ho. -axis ke along (): value . -axis ke along (): value . Alag directions → alag values → limit DNE.

L3·Q2

Classic trap. Dikhao ki exist nahi karta, jabki har straight line deti hai.

Recall Solution

Sabhi lines : Har line kehti hai. Curve : kyun: yeh numerator aur denominator ko same order () banata hai — woh "balanced" path jo lines nahi dekh sakti. Lines deti hain, curve deta hai → limit DNE. Figure dekho: do paths aur unki level values.

Figure — Limits and continuity in 2D — path-dependence issue

L3·Q3

Investigate karo

Recall Solution

Sabhi lines : ( ke liye; bhi deta hai). Curve (orders balance karne ke liye choose kiya — denominator ke dono terms ban jaate hain): Lines deti hain, curve pe milta hai → limit DNE.


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Continuity, piecewise values, aur multiple tools combine karo.)

L4·Q1

Define karo Kya origin par continuous hai? Prove karo.

Recall Solution

Continuity ke liye teen cheezein chahiye: exist kare (yeh hai), limit exist kare, aur dono match karein. Parent Worked Example 3 se, , toh limit hai. Kyunki , origin par continuous hai.

L4·Q2

Define karo Kya koi aisi value hai jo ko origin par continuous banaye?

Recall Solution

Continuity ke liye pehle limit ka exist karna zaroori hai. Lekin ka polar mein value hai — pure , toh ke along yeh hai aur ke along hai. Limit DNE. Kyunki koi single exist nahi karta, koi bhi ko continuous nahi bana sakta. ✗ Key point: continuity ek path-dependent limit ko repair nahi kar sakti — defect surface mein hai, assigned value mein nahi.

L4·Q3

Maano jab . Origin par kaun si value ko continuous banayegi?

Recall Solution

substitute karo. Jab , toh , aur (standard 1D limit — yahan allowed hai kyunki sirf ke through par depend karta hai, toh koi bhi direction matter nahi kar sakta). Isliye limit hai, aur origin par continuous hai tabhi jab set karein.


Level 5 — Mastery

(Full rigour: bounds / se argument banao.)

L5·Q1

Ek rigorous $\varepsilon$–$\delta$ proof do ki

Recall Solution

Goal: given , ek dhundho jisme Bound: , toh choose karo. Tab force karta hai . Yeh poori disk of radius par hold karta hai, sirf paths par nahi — toh yeh airtight hai.

L5·Q2

Ek aisi function construct karo jo origin se hone wali har straight line ke along ho lekin origin par jiska limit ho. ( trap ko generalise karo.)

Recall Solution

Lo Ruko — verify karo. Lines : Har line deti hai. ✔ Curve : Is parabola ke along value constantly hai. ✔ Toh sabhi lines par hai phir bhi par tak pahunchta hai — limit DNE hai, aur khaas taur par yeh nahi hai. Yeh L3·Q2 trap ka exact mechanism hai, value hit karne ke liye tune kiya gaya. Figure dekho.

Figure — Limits and continuity in 2D — path-dependence issue

L5·Q3

Prove karo ki exist nahi karta, axes AND diagonal dono test karte hue dhyan se.

Recall Solution

-axis ke along (): numerator , denominator , toh . -axis ke along (): numerator , toh . Diagonal ke along: tab , toh Diagonal kyun: term exactly par zero ho jaata hai, denominator ka "spoiler" khatam ho jaata hai aur bach jaata hai. Axes dete hain, diagonal deta hai → limit DNE.


Connections

  • Multivariable Calculus — parent chapter
  • Squeeze Theorem — "limit exists" wale problems prove karta hai (L2, L4, L5)
  • Polar Coordinates test jo L2–L3 mein use hua
  • Epsilon-Delta Definition — L5·Q1 ke liye rigour engine
  • Differentiability in 2D — L4 mein establish ki gayi continuity chahiye