Path A — along x-axis (y=0):f(x,0)=x2+0x⋅0=0→0.Why this step? Setting y=0 collapses the problem to 1D; the numerator vanishes.
Path B — along the line y=mx:f(x,mx)=x2+m2x2x⋅mx=x2(1+m2)mx2=1+m2m.Why this step? Substitute y=mx and cancel x2 (legal since x=0 on the path). The x's vanish — the value depends only on the slope m.
Verdict:m=0 gives 0; m=1 gives 21. Different paths → different values → limit does not exist.
All straight lines y=mx:f(x,mx)=x2+m4x4x⋅m2x2=x2(1+m4x2)m2x3=1+m4x2m2x→0.Why this step? Factor x2 from the denominator; the surviving factor x in the numerator forces the limit to 0 as x→0. So every line says 0.
Now the curve x=y2:f(y2,y)=(y2)2+y4y2⋅y2=y4+y4y4=2y4y4=21.Why this step? We chose x=y2 to make numerator and denominator the same order (y4). This is the "balanced" path the lines missed.
Verdict: lines give 0, parabola gives 21 → limit does not exist. (This is the steel-man trap made concrete.)
Step 1: Note x2+y2x2≤1 for all (x,y)=(0,0).
Why? The denominator x2+y2≥x2, so the fraction is at most 1.
Step 2: Therefore
x2+y2x2y=∣y∣⋅x2+y2x2≤∣y∣.Why this step? Pull out ∣y∣, then bound the leftover fraction by 1.
Step 3: As (x,y)→(0,0), ∣y∣→0. By the Squeeze Theorem the whole thing →0.
(x,y)→(0,0)limx2+y2x2y=0Why this is airtight: the bound ∣f∣≤∣y∣ holds on the entire disk, so no path can escape it. That's exactly what ε–δ needs.
Every path approaching the point must give the same value (the whole disk, not just two directions).
Can matching finitely many paths prove a 2D limit exists?
No — it can only disprove it (by finding a mismatch). Proof needs ε-δ or Squeeze.
Limit of x2+y2xy at origin?
Does not exist; along y=mx it equals 1+m2m, which varies with m.
Why does x2+y4xy2 trap students?
All straight lines give 0, but the path x=y2 gives 21 → limit DNE.
What does it mean if the polar form keeps a θ as r→0?
The value depends on direction → path-dependent → limit does not exist.
State the 3 conditions for continuity of f at (a,b).
f(a,b) exists; the limit exists; the limit equals f(a,b).
Limit of x2+y2x2y at origin and why?
0; bound ∣f∣≤∣y∣→0 by Squeeze on the whole disk.
A function homogeneous of degree 0 — what's special about its directional limits?
Constant along each ray, so different rays generally give different values → usually no limit.
Recall Feynman: explain to a 12-year-old
Imagine you and friends all walking toward the same lamppost in a foggy field. In 1D you can only come from the left road or the right road. But in a field you can come from any direction — straight, curvy, zig-zag. A "limit existing" means: no matter which path you walk, the height of the ground right at the lamppost looks the same to everybody. If your friend on the curvy path sees the ground at height 0 but you on the straight path see height ½, then there's a weird crack right at the lamppost — the "limit" is broken. To prove it's smooth you must show everyone, on every imaginable path, ends up at the same height — usually by trapping the height between two squeezing walls that both shrink to the same number.
Dekho, 1D limit mein sirf do raaste hote hain — left se aao ya right se. Lekin 2D mein point tak pahunchne ke infinite raaste hote hain: seedhi lines, parabola, curve, spiral, kuch bhi. Limit tabhi exist karti hai jab har ek path same value de. Agar do bhi paths alag-alag answer dein, to limit exist nahi karti — bas yahi pura funda hai (PDD: Paths Disagree → Death).
Classic example: x2+y2xy at origin. y=0 pe limit 0 aata hai, par y=x pe 21. Do paths disagree ho gaye → limit DNE. Aur ek bada trap hai x2+y4xy2 — yahan saari straight lines0 dengi, par jaise hi tum x=y2 wala curve try karoge, 21 aa jaata hai. Isliye yaad rakho: "Lines Lie, Curves Confess" — sirf lines match ho jaane se khush mat ho jao.
Important baat: paths se tum sirf limit ko galat saabit kar sakte ho (mismatch dhoondh ke). Limit exist karti hai ye prove karne ke liye paths kaafi nahi — Squeeze Theorem ya ε-δ bound chahiye. Jaise x2+y2x2y mein hum dikhate hain ∣f∣≤∣y∣→0, aur ye bound poore disk pe valid hai, isliye limit 0 hai. Ek aur tagda trick: polar coordinates. x=rcosθ,y=rsinθ daal do; agar r→0 ke baad bhi θ bacha hua hai, matlab direction pe depend kar raha hai → limit fail. Continuity matlab limit exist kare aur f(a,b) ke barabar ho — agar limit hi path-dependent hai to function kabhi continuous nahi ban sakta.