Worked examples — Arc length formula — derivation
The scenario matrix
Every arc-length problem falls into one of these cells. We work at least one example of each.
| Cell | What makes it special | Where the danger is | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Straight line | slope constant, integrand constant | none — it's the sanity check | Ex 1 |
| B. Engineered curve | collapses to a perfect square | must spot the algebra | Ex 2 |
| C. Sign trap | , expression goes negative | dropping the absolute value | Ex 3 |
| D. Curve given as | integrate in , not | vertical tangents force the switch | Ex 4 |
| E. Degenerate / zero-length | endpoints equal, or | must give , not nonsense | Ex 5 |
| F. Ugly integral | no elementary antiderivative | set up exactly, estimate numerically | Ex 6 |
| G. Word problem (units) | real quantity, real units | carry units, interpret answer | Ex 7 |
| H. Exam twist | parameter/limit hidden inside | patience with the algebra | Ex 8 |
| I. Parametric | no single ; use | must use the form | Ex 9 |
| J. Polar | curve given by radius vs angle | must use the form | Ex 10 |
Cell A — the straight line (sanity check)
The figure below draws exactly this: the yellow line, and the blue horizontal leg with the pink vertical leg forming the right triangle whose hypotenuse is the arc. Because the "curve" is straight, arc and chord coincide — the picture is the whole proof.

Cell B — the engineered curve
Cell C — the sign trap
Cell D — curve given as
Find the length of the curve from to .
Forecast: identical machinery, but integrate in . Why? Because this curve is a function of — for one there's one , but for one there could be two 's. Integrating in would double-count.
- Why this step? Differentiate with respect to : , .
- Why this step? with cross term .
- Why this step? The flips : perfect square again.
- Use the -version of the formula: Why this step? For the parent gives — the roles of and simply swap.
- Why this step? Antiderivative of is ; of is . Then .
Verify: the true endpoints are and with and . So and . Chord . Arc . ✓ Arc beats chord, as it must.
Cell E — the degenerate case
Find the arc length of "from to ."
Forecast: the two endpoints are the same point. A bug that starts and ends where it began walks... how far?
- The interval has width . Why this step? Before touching , notice . There is no interval to integrate over.
- Why this step? — upper and lower limit coincide, so the "signed strip" has zero width.
Verify: length must be (it's a distance) and here it collapses to exactly . A path of no horizontal and no arc extent has length . ✓ The formula degrades gracefully — it never returns garbage for a trivial input.
A robust formula must handle the boring extreme (empty interval) as smoothly as the interesting ones. If your setup ever gives a nonzero length for , you've made a sign or limit error.
Cell F — the honest ugly integral
Set up and estimate the length of (a parabola) from to .
Forecast: not every curve is engineered. The integrand here does not collapse — we'll get a real, non-elementary integral and must estimate it.
- Why this step? Power rule on .
- Why this step? ; this does not factor into a perfect square, so no algebra shortcut exists.
- To make the root friendlier, substitute , so , i.e. . When ; when . The integral becomes , which is the standard form Why this step? The substitution turns into the clean pattern , whose antiderivative is a memorised standard result (proved by trig/hyperbolic substitution). We do the substitution first so the answer matches a formula we can look up rather than re-deriving from scratch.
- Put it together: Why this step? At : ; at both terms vanish. The outer from multiplies through.
Verify: . Chord from to is . ✓ Slightly longer, as a curve must be.
Cell G — the word problem (carry units!)
A cable hangs so that its height (in metres) above the ground is , where runs from to (horizontal position). How much cable is needed?
Forecast: "how much cable" = arc length, not horizontal span. The answer will be in metres and must exceed the horizontal run.
- Why this step? ; .
- Why this step? with cross term (NOT — this is exactly where the perfect-square hope dies).
- Perfect-square test. For a collapse we'd need . But the true , which is not that square. So this curve is NOT engineered. Why this step? Always multiply out the guessed square and compare. Because the cross term is , adding can never flip it to the needed . The shortcut fails; be honest.
- Numerically (Simpson's rule on the integrand), . Why this step? No clean antiderivative → estimate. Units of are metres, integrand is dimensionless (a ratio of lengths), so comes out in metres.
Verify: horizontal run is ; the cable must be longer than , and . ✓ Units: metres, as required for a physical cable.
Cell H — the exam twist
For , find the value of so that the arc length from to equals .
Forecast: we won't be given — we solve for it. The arc length becomes a function of ; set it equal to and invert.
- Why this step? Chain rule on ; the constants were chosen to cancel.
- Why this step? ; add to get . Clean by design.
- Why this step? ; evaluate on .
- Set . Multiply both sides by : , so . Raise both sides to the power : Why this step? We are solving one equation for one unknown . Each move isolates : multiply by to clear the fraction, add , then apply the inverse of "" — namely "" — to undo the fractional power and free . ( because ; squaring gives .)
Verify: with : . ✓ Matches the target exactly.
Cell I — parametric curves
Some curves (a circle, a spiral, a bouncing path) are not one for each . Instead a parameter (think: time) drives both coordinates: , . The bug's position is a movie frame indexed by . See Parametric arc length for the full build.
The same tiny-triangle Pythagoras still holds — — but now both legs are driven by . Divide the triangle by instead of : Notice there is no here — the "" was only ever the -leg after dividing by . When we divide by instead, both legs become honest derivatives.
Find the arc length of for from to .
Forecast: this traces a circle of radius ; a quarter of it should be . Guess before computing.
- Why this step? Differentiate each coordinate with respect to the driver ; , .
- Why this step? Factor out and use — the Pythagorean identity is exactly Pythagoras on the unit circle, which is why the speed here is constant.
- Why this step? is constant; integrating a constant over an interval is height width.
Verify: matches our forecast . Also, radius- full circle has circumference ; a quarter is . ✓

Cell J — polar curves
A polar curve gives the radius (distance from the origin) as a function of the angle . This is natural for spirals and petals. It is really just a parametric curve with as the parameter: . See Polar arc length.
Feeding those into the parametric formula and simplifying (the identity does the cleanup) gives the polar arc-length form: Read it as Pythagoras once more: one leg is the radial stretch , the other is the sideways sweep .
) Find the arc length of the spiral from to .
Forecast: the exponential's derivative equals itself, so both terms under the root will be — expect a clean multiple of .
- Why this step? — the exponential is its own derivative.
- Why this step? Both pieces are ; adding gives . This is why the exponential spiral is a "cleanest possible" polar example.
- (positive, so no absolute-value issue). Why this step? since always; pull the out front.
- Why this step? ; at , ; at , .
Verify: . Endpoints in : at , ; at , so . Chord . ✓ Arc beats chord.
Recall Which cell is this?
Given a problem, first classify it. Say the cell out loud. A cable "how much material" problem is which cell? ::: Cell G — word problem, carry units, answer > horizontal span. with a vertical tangent somewhere is which cell? ::: Cell D — integrate in . appearing (no perfect square) is which cell? ::: Cell F — honest integral; substitute then use . A bracket that goes negative on part of is which cell? ::: Cell C — keep the absolute value, . Curve given as is which cell, and what's the integrand? ::: Cell I — , no . Curve given as is which cell, and what's the integrand? ::: Cell J — .
Before integrating: (1) Is ? (Cell E → answer .) (2) Does square nicely? Actually multiply out the guess (Cells B/C vs F). (3) Is the curve , , or ? (Cells D/I/J → use the matching integrand.) (4) Real-world? (Cell G → units, answer must beat the span.)
Connections
- 4.2.16 Arc length formula — derivation — the single formula every example here exercises.
- Pythagorean theorem — every "arc ≥ chord" sanity check rides on it.
- Mean Value Theorem — the reason the integrand is at all.
- Riemann sums and the definite integral — what the ugly Cell F integral is estimated by.
- Parametric arc length — Cell I: the form.
- Polar arc length — Cell J: the form.
- Surface area of revolution — reuses this exact element.