Move 1 — differentiate.dxdy=3x2 (power rule).
Move 2 — build the integrand.(dxdy)2=9x4, so 1+(y′)2=1+9x4.
Move 3 — assemble the integral between the given limits:
L=∫141+9x4dx.
That is a correct setup. (This one has no nice closed form — recognition problems only test that you can build the integral, not evaluate it.)
Recall Solution
(2x1)2=4x21, so
1+(y′)2=1+4x21=4x24x2+1.Why write it over a common denominator? Because the next step is always ⋅, and roots of fractions split as 2x4x2+1 — cleaner to spot whether the top is a perfect square.
Move 1.dxdy=32⋅23(x−1)1/2=(x−1)1/2. Why so clean? The constants 32 were chosen precisely so the 23 from the power rule cancels.
Move 2.(y′)2=x−1, so 1+(y′)2=1+(x−1)=x. A perfect... well, just x. Even nicer.
Move 3.L=∫15xdx=[32x3/2]15=32(53/2−1)=32(55−1).
Numerically ≈6.79. Sanity check: endpoints are (1,0) and (5,32⋅8)=(5,316)≈(5,5.33); chord =16+28.4≈6.66<6.79. The curve is longer than its chord ✓. See the figure below.
Recall Solution
Why the x=g(y) formula? Because the curve is handed to us as x depending on y, so the natural leg to pull out of the root is dy.
Move 1.dydx=31⋅23y1/2=21y1/2.
Move 2.(dydx)2=4y, so 1+4y=44+y, and ⋅=24+y.
Move 3.L=∫0324+ydy=21⋅32(4+y)3/203=31(73/2−43/2)=31(77−8).
Numerically ≈3.51.
Move 1.dxdy=2x2−2x21. Why term-by-term? Sum rule; 2x1=21x−1 differentiates to −21x−2.
Move 2 — the analysis step. Write the slope as P−Q with P=2x2 and Q=2x21. Square it, watching the cross term:
(P−Q)2=P2−2PQ+Q2=4x4−2⋅2x2⋅2x21+4x41=4x4−21+4x41.
The cross term is −2PQ=−21. Now add the mandatory 1 from the formula:
1+(y′)2=4x4+(−21+1)+4x41=4x4+21+4x41.Why is this now a perfect square? The perfect square (P+Q)2=P2+2PQ+Q2 needs a middle term of +2PQ=+21. We started with −21, and adding 1 lands us exactly on +21 — because −21+1=+21. So the "+1" is precisely the amount that flips the middle term from −2PQ to +2PQ. Hence
1+(y′)2=(2x2+2x21)2=(P+Q)2.
This only works because these curves are engineered so that 2PQ=21 exactly; then the formula's +1 does the sign flip for free.
Move 3 — take the root (positive on [1,2]):L=∫12(2x2+2x21)dx=[6x3−2x1]12=(68−41)−(61−21)=1213+31=1217.
Numerically ≈1.417.
Recall Solution
Move 1.dxdy=cosx−sinx=−tanx. Why? Chain rule: derivative of lnu is u′/u with u=cosx.
Move 2.(y′)2=tan2x, and the Pythagorean identity 1+tan2x=sec2x gives 1+(y′)2=sec2x.
Move 3 — mind the absolute value.sec2x=∣secx∣. On [0,4π], cosx>0 so secx>0 and ∣secx∣=secx. Thus
L=∫0π/4secxdx=[ln∣secx+tanx∣]0π/4=ln(2+1)−ln(1)=ln(1+2).
Numerically ≈0.881.
Why ds appears here. A surface of revolution is swept by a tiny arc piece of length ds travelling in a circle of radius y; each band has area 2πyds. So we reuse the same ds=1+(y′)2dx built in the parent derivation.
Move 1.y=x1/2⇒dxdy=21x−1/2=2x1.
Move 2.1+(y′)2=1+4x1=4x4x+1, so ds=2x4x+1dx.
Move 3 — assemble the surface integral with radius y=x:
S=∫012πyds=∫012πx⋅2x4x+1dx=π∫014x+1dx.
The x from radius and the x in the denominator cancel — a single clean square root remains. (Evaluating: π⋅41⋅32(4x+1)3/201=6π(55−1)≈5.33.)
Recall Solution
Why a new-looking formula, same idea. Over a tiny dt, the point moves dx=dtdxdt across and dy=dtdydt up. Pythagoras on that infinitesimal triangle: ds=dx2+dy2=(dtdx)2+(dtdy)2dt. Identical to the parent, just parameterised by t.
Move 1.dtdx=2t,dtdy=3t2.
Move 2.(dtdx)2+(dtdy)2=4t2+9t4=t2(4+9t2), so ds=t4+9t2dt (with t≥0 on [0,1], so t2=t, not ∣t∣ trouble).
Move 3. Substitute u=4+9t2, du=18tdt:
L=∫01t4+9t2dt=181∫413udu=181⋅32u3/2413=271(1313−8).
Numerically ≈1.44.
Why that polar ds. In polar coordinates a tiny step has a radial part dr and a sideways arc part rdθ (arc = radius × angle). These two are perpendicular, so Pythagoras gives ds=(dr)2+(rdθ)2=(dθdr)2+r2dθ — same Pythagorean skeleton. See the figure below.
Move 1.dθdr=−sinθ.
Move 2.r2+(dθdr)2=(1+cosθ)2+sin2θ=1+2cosθ+cos2θ+sin2θ=2+2cosθ.
Use the half-angle identity 1+cosθ=2cos22θ, so 2+2cosθ=4cos22θ and
2+2cosθ=2cos2θ.Move 3 — check the sign. On θ∈[0,π], 2θ∈[0,2π], where cos2θ≥0, so the bars drop safely:
L=∫0π2cos2θdθ=2⋅1/2sin(θ/2)0π=4sin2θ0π=4(sin2π−0)=4.
The full cardioid (0 to 2π) would be twice this, 8, by symmetry.
Recall Solution
Move 1 — differentiate. With y=2(a+1)1xa+1+2(a−1)1x−(a−1):
dxdy=2(a+1)a+1xa+2(a−1)−(a−1)x−a=21xa−21x−a.Why the constants matter: the denominators 2(a±1) are chosen so the exponent factors (a±1) cancel, leaving the clean 21x±a.
Move 2 — square, watch the cross term. With P=21xa, Q=21x−a:
(y′)2=(P−Q)2=P2−2PQ+Q2,2PQ=2⋅21xa⋅21x−a=21.
So (y′)2=41x2a−21+41x−2a. Add 1: the middle term −21 becomes −21+1=+21=+2PQ:
1+(y′)2=41x2a+21+41x−2a=(P+Q)2=(21xa+21x−a)2.Conclusion.1+(y′)2=21xa+21x−a (positive for x>0). This is why textbook arc-length curves always split into "power plus reciprocal power": the mandatory +1 turns the difference-of-squares cross term −21 into the sum-of-squares +21. That's the fingerprint you now recognise instantly.
Recall Master checklist (open only after trying all)
Did I differentiate first, then square? (L1 trap)
Is the curve given as y(x), x(y), (x(t),y(t)), or r(θ)? Pick the matching ds. (L2/L4 traps)
After (stuff)2, is stuff≥0 on the whole interval? If not, split the integral where the sign changes, or carry ∣stuff∣. (L3/L5 traps)
Sanity: is my answer ≥ the straight chord between endpoints? Length can never be shorter than a straight line.